Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Austin Parker

dblp:72/5830 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 56% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data models and query languages · 56% Query processing and optimization · 22% Data integration and cleaning · 22%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 54% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 46%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game tree search
0.232010
When is it better not to look ahead? · Artif. Intell. 2010
Overconfidence or Paranoia? Search in Imperfect-Information Games · AAAI 2006
Game-Tree Search with Combinatorially Large Belief States · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief revision
0.222010
An AGM-style belief revision mechanism for probabilistic spatio-temporal logics · Artif. Intell. 2010
An AGM-Based Belief Revision Mechanism for Probabilistic Spatio-Temporal Logics · AAAI 2008
Data models and query languages › uncertain data management
probabilistic spatial databases
0.222009
SPOT Databases: Efficient Consistency Checking and Optimistic Selection in Probabilistic Spatial Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
A Logical Formulation of Probabilistic Spatial Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
spatio-temporal reasoning
0.122010
An AGM-Based Belief Revision Mechanism for Probabilistic Spatio-Temporal Logics · AAAI 2008
An AGM-style belief revision mechanism for probabilistic spatio-temporal logics · Artif. Intell. 2010
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
inconsistency detection
0.112009
SPOT Databases: Efficient Consistency Checking and Optimistic Selection in Probabilistic Spatial Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
Query processing and optimization › query execution › relational operators
selection operator
0.112009
SPOT Databases: Efficient Consistency Checking and Optimistic Selection in Probabilistic Spatial Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2009
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game playing
computer go
0.112007
Probabilistic Go Theories · IJCAI 2007
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game playing
0.112007
Probabilistic Go Theories · IJCAI 2007
Logic in computer science › semantics
declarative semantics
0.112007
A Logical Formulation of Probabilistic Spatial Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2007
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
imperfect information games
0.112006
Overconfidence or Paranoia? Search in Imperfect-Information Games · AAAI 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
belief state search
0.112005
Game-Tree Search with Combinatorially Large Belief States · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic
0.012010
An AGM-style belief revision mechanism for probabilistic spatio-temporal logics · Artif. Intell. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 0.2game theory · 0.1AGM-style revision · 0.1search space pruning · 0.1indexing · 0.1probabilistic logic · 0.1AGM postulates · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Approximate Achievability in Event Databases
Austin Parker, Gerardo I. Simari, Amy Sliva, V. S. Subrahmanian
ECSQARU1
2011 Annotated probabilistic temporal logic
abstract
The semantics of most logics of time and probability is given via a probability distribution over threads , where a thread is a structure specifying what will be true at different points in time (in the future). When assessing the probabilities of statements such as “Event a will occur within 5 units of time of event b ,” there are many different semantics possible, even when assessing the truth of this statement within a single thread. We introduce the syntax of annotated probabilistic temporal (APT) logic programs and axiomatically introduce the key notion of a frequency function (for the first time) to capture different types of intrathread reasoning, and then provide a semantics for intrathread and interthread reasoning in APT logic programs parameterized by such frequency functions. We develop a comprehensive set of complexity results for consistency checking and entailment in APT logic programs, together with sound and complete algorithms to check consistency and entailment. The basic algorithms use linear programming, but we then show how to substantially and correctly reduce the sizes of these linear programs to yield better computational properties. We describe a real world application we are developing using APT logic programs.
Paulo Shakarian, Austin Parker, Gerardo I. Simari, V. S. Subrahmanian
ACM Trans. Comput. Log.2
2010 An AGM-style belief revision mechanism for probabilistic spatio-temporal logics
John Grant, Francesco Parisi, Austin Parker, V. S. Subrahmanian
Artif. Intell.3
2010 When is it better not to look ahead?
Dana S. Nau, Mitja Lustrek, Austin Parker, Ivan Bratko, Matjaz Gams
Artif. Intell.3
2009 SPOT Databases: Efficient Consistency Checking and Optimistic Selection in Probabilistic Spatial Databases
abstract
Spatial probabilistic temporal (SPOT) databases are a paradigm for reasoning with probabilistic statements about where a vehicle may be now or in the future. They express statements of the form "Object O is in spatial region R at some time t with some probability in the interval [L,U]." Past work on SPOT databases has developed selection operators based on selecting SPOT atoms that are entailed by the SPOT database-we call this "cautious" selection. In this paper, we study several problems. First, we note that the runtime of consistency checking and cautious selection algorithms in past work is influenced greatly by the granularity of the underlying Cartesian space. In this paper, we first introduce the notion of "optimistic" selection, where we are interested in returning all SPOT atoms in a database that are consistent with respect to a query, rather than having an entailment relationship. We then develop an approach to scaling SPOT databases that has three main contributions: 1) We develop methods to eliminate variables from the linear programs used in past work, thus greatly reducing the size of the linear programs used-the resulting advances apply to consistency checking, optimistic selection, and cautious selection. 2) We develop a host of theorems to show how we can prune the search space when we are interested in optimistic selection. 3) We use the above contributions to build an efficient index to execute optimistic selection queries over SPOT databases. Our approach is superior to past work in two major respects: First, it makes fewer assumptions than all past works on this topic except that in. Second, our experiments, which are based on real-world data about ship movements, show that our algorithms are much more efficient than those in.
Austin Parker, Guillaume Infantes, John Grant, V. S. Subrahmanian
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2008 An AGM-Based Belief Revision Mechanism for Probabilistic Spatio-Temporal Logics
Austin Parker, Guillaume Infantes, V. S. Subrahmanian, John Grant
AAAI1
2007 Probabilistic Go Theories
Austin Parker, Fusun Yaman, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
IJCAI1
2007 A Logical Formulation of Probabilistic Spatial Databases
abstract
There are numerous applications where there: is uncertainty over space and time. Examples of such uncertainty arise in vehicle tracking systems where we are not always sure where a vehicle is now (or may be in the future), and cell and satellite phone applications where we are not sure exactly where a phone may be, and so on. In this paper, we propose the concept of a Spatial Probabilistic Temporal (SPOT) database that contains statements of the form "Object O is in spatial region R at some time / with some probability in the interval [L, U]." We define the syntax and a declarative semantics for SPOT databases based on a mix of logic and linear programming, as well as query algebra. We show alternative implementations of some of these query algebra operators when the SPOT database has a disjoint/less property. Though the declarative semantics of SPOT databases is rooted in linear programming, we have found very efficient algorithms that do not use linear programming methods. We report on experiments we have conducted that show that the system scales to large numbers of SPOT atoms, as well as to fairly fine temporal and spatial granularity.
Austin Parker, V. S. Subrahmanian, John Grant
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2006 Overconfidence or Paranoia? Search in Imperfect-Information Games
Austin Parker, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
AAAI1
2005 Game-Tree Search with Combinatorially Large Belief States
Austin Parker, Dana S. Nau, V. S. Subrahmanian
IJCAI1