Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amr F. Fahmy

dblp:73/6339 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing
parallel programming languages
0.011993
Common runtime support for high-performance parallel languages · SC 1993
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming runtimes
0.011993
Common runtime support for high-performance parallel languages · SC 1993
Compilers and program optimization
parallel language compilation
0.011993
Common runtime support for high-performance parallel languages · SC 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

runtime system · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Efficient Learning of Real Time One-Counter Automata
Amr F. Fahmy, Robert S. Roos
ALT1
1994 Supporting multiple evolving compilers
Thomas E. Cheatham, Amr F. Fahmy, Dan C. Stefanescu
SEKE2
1994 Teaching a hierarchical model of computation with animation software in the first course
abstract
In a world saturated with computers, it is important that the popnlace have some understanding of what thesedevices am, how they work, what they can do, and what they cannot do.People will not intelligently
Alan W. Biermann, Amr F. Fahmy, Curry I. Guinn, David M. Pennock, Dietolf Ramm, Peter Wu
SIGCSE2
1994 On the errors that learning machines will make
abstract
Associated with each learning system there is a class of learnable behaviors. If the target behavior to be acquired is in the learnable class, it will be learned perfectly. If it is outside that class, the machine will only be able to acquire a behavior that approximates the target and it will always make errors. It is desirable for a learning machine to have a large learnable class to maximize the chances of acquiring the unknown behavior and to minimize the expected error when only an approximation is possible. However, it is also desirable to have a small learnable class so that learning can be achieved rapidly. Thus the design of learning machines involves selecting a position on the spectrum: minimum error and slow learning time versus larger error and faster learning time. A computational method is given for finding where a given learning machine is on this spectrum. Machines that have fast learning times, relatively small learnable classes, and thus relatively large expected errors are called realization sparse in this article. These machines do little better than a random coin flipping algorithm in many situations. It is shown that many common learning systems are of this type including signature tables, linear system models, and conjunctive normal form expression based systems. These studies lead to the concept of an “optimum” machine which spreads its learnable behaviors across the behavior space in a manner to minimize the expected error. an approximation to such optimum machines is presented and its behavior is compared to the more traditional learning machines. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Alan W. Biermann, Kermit C. Gilbert, Amr F. Fahmy, B. Koster
Int. J. Intell. Syst.3
1993 Common runtime support for high-performance parallel languages
abstract
No abstract available.
Geoffrey C. Fox, Sanjay Ranka, Michael L. Scott, Allen D. Malony, James C. Browne, Marina C. Chen, Alok N. Choudhary, Thomas E. Cheatham, Janice E. Cuny, Rudolf Eigenmann, Amr F. Fahmy, Ian T. Foster, Dennis Gannon, Tomasz Haupt, Carl Kesselman, Charles Koelbel, Wei Li 0015, Monica S. Lam, Thomas J. LeBlanc, Jim Openshaw, David A. Padua, Constantine D. Polychronopoulos, Joel H. Saltz, Alan Sussman, Gil Weigand, Katherine A. Yelick
SC11
1993 Synthesis of Real Time Acceptors
Amr F. Fahmy, Alan W. Biermann
J. Symb. Comput.1