Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dhanya Devarajan

dblp:74/5389 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless sensing and localization · 62% Internet of things and sensor networks · 38%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed inference
0.112008
Calibrating Distributed Camera Networks · Proc. IEEE 2008
Internet of things and sensor networks › camera sensor networks › camera networks
distributed camera network
0.012008
Calibrating Distributed Camera Networks · Proc. IEEE 2008
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.012008
Calibrating Distributed Camera Networks · Proc. IEEE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision graph estimation · 0.2nonlinear optimization · 0.2belief propagation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Calibrating Distributed Camera Networks
abstract
Recent developments in wireless sensor networks have made feasible distributed camera networks, in which cameras and processing nodes may be spread over a wide geographical area, with no centralized processor and limited ability to communicate a large amount of information over long distances. This paper overviews distributed algorithms for the calibration of such camera networks- that is, the automatic estimation of each camera's position, orientation, and focal length. In particular, we discuss a decentralized method for obtaining the vision graph for a distributed camera network, in which each edge of the graph represents two cameras that image a sufficiently large part of the same environment. We next describe a distributed algorithm in which each camera performs a local, robust nonlinear optimization over the camera parameters and scene points of its vision graph neighbors in order to obtain an initial calibration estimate. We then show how a distributed inference algorithm based on belief propagation can refine the initial estimate to be both accurate and globally consistent.
Dhanya Devarajan, Zhaolin Cheng, Richard J. Radke
Proc. IEEE1
2006 Distributed metric calibration of ad hoc camera networks
abstract
We discuss how to automatically obtain the metric calibration of an ad hoc network of cameras with no centralized processor. We model the set of uncalibrated cameras as nodes in a communication network, and propose a distributed algorithm in which each camera performs a local, robust bundle adjustment over the camera parameters and scene points of its neighbors in an overlay “vision graph.” We analyze the performance of the algorithm on both simulated and real data, and show that the distributed algorithm results in a fairer allocation of messages per node while achieving comparable calibration accuracy to centralized bundle adjustment.
Dhanya Devarajan, Richard J. Radke, Haeyong Chung
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks1