Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sandeep Phadke
dblp:74/5987
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Towards a taxonomy of software connectors · ICSE 2000 |
Requirements engineering and software design › component-based software
software component interconnection |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Towards a taxonomy of software connectors · ICSE 2000 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
software connectors |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Towards a taxonomy of software connectors · ICSE 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taxonomy construction · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Towards a taxonomy of software connectorsabstractSoftware systems of today are frequently composed from prefabricated, heterogeneous components that provide complex functionality and engage in complex interactions. Existing research on component-based development has mostly focused on component structure, interfaces, and functionality. Recently, software architecture has emerged as an area that also places significant importance on component interactions, embodied in the notion of software connectors. However, the current level of understanding and support for connectors has been insufficient. This has resulted in their inconsistent treatment and a notable lack of understanding of what the fundamental building blocks of software interaction are and how they can be composed into more complex interactions. This paper attempts to address this problem. It presents a comprehensive classification framework and taxonomy of software connectors. The taxonomy is obtained through an extensive analysis of existing component interactions. The taxonomy is used both to understand existing software connectors and to suggest new, unprecedented connectors. We demonstrate the use of the taxonomy on the architecture of a large, existing system. Nikunj R. Mehta, Nenad Medvidovic, Sandeep Phadke |
ICSE | 3 |