Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathan Silberman
dblp:75/10432
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-8498-5796ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
11 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Generative modeling · 14% Learning theory · 13% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017 Domain Separation Networks · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
annotator modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations · ECCV (10) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations · ECCV (10) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
image-to-image translation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › visual domain adaptation
pixel-level domain adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
food recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › object segmentation
food segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › perceptual grouping
contour completion |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions · ECCV (3) 2014 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Instance Segmentation of Indoor Scenes Using a Coverage Loss · ECCV (1) 2014 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions · ECCV (3) 2014 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
indoor scene segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images · ECCV (5) 2012 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › exponential family
maximum entropy models |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
domain-invariant representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Domain Separation Networks · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Instance Segmentation of Indoor Scenes Using a Coverage Loss · ECCV (1) 2014 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions · ECCV (3) 2014 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
RGB-D scene understanding |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images · ECCV (5) 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
support estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images · ECCV (5) 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inter-annotator agreement · 0.4discrepancy ratio · 0.4regularization · 0.4confusion matrix estimation · 0.4decision boundary crossing · 0.3GAN · 0.3pixel-space transformation · 0.3generative adversarial network · 0.3private-shared component analysis · 0.2domain separation · 0.2multi-label classification · 0.2convolutional neural network · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Discrepancy Ratio: Evaluating Model Performance When Even Experts Disagree on the Truth
Igor Lovchinsky, Alon Daks, Israel Malkin, Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Tomer Gafner, Ben Sternlieb, Patrick Maher, Nathan Silberman |
ICLR | 11 |
| 2019 | Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator ConfusionabstractThe predictive performance of supervised learning algorithms depends on the quality of labels. In a typical label collection process, multiple annotators provide subjective noisy estimates of the ``truth" under the influence of their varying skill-levels and biases. Blindly treating these noisy labels as the ground truth limits the accuracy of learning algorithms in the presence of strong disagreement. This problem is critical for applications in domains such as medical imaging where both the annotation cost and inter-observer variability are high. In this work, we present a method for simultaneously learning the individual annotator model and the underlying true label distribution, using only noisy observations. Each annotator is modeled by a confusion matrix that is jointly estimated along with the classifier predictions. We propose to add a regularization term to the loss function that encourages convergence to the true annotator confusion matrix. We provide a theoretical argument as to how the regularization is essential to our approach both for the case of single annotator and multiple annotators. Despite the simplicity of the idea, experiments on image classification tasks with both simulated and real labels show that our method either outperforms or performs on par with the state-of-the-art methods and is capable of estimating the skills of annotators even with a single label available per image. Ryutaro Tanno, Ardavan Saeedi, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Daniel C. Alexander, Nathan Silberman |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2019 | The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs
Zbigniew Wojna, Vittorio Ferrari, Sergio Guadarrama, Nathan Silberman, Liang-Chieh Chen, Alireza Fathi, Jasper R. R. Uijlings |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 4 |
| 2018 | ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations
Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, Liam Nakagawa, Nathan Silberman |
ECCV (10) | 4 |
| 2017 | The Devil is in the Decoder
Zbigniew Wojna, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Sergio Guadarrama, Nathan Silberman, Liang-Chieh Chen, Alireza Fathi, Vittorio Ferrari |
BMVC | 4 |
| 2017 | Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial NetworksabstractCollecting well-annotated image datasets to train modern machine learning algorithms is prohibitively expensive for many tasks. One appealing alternative is rendering synthetic data where ground-truth annotations are generated automatically. Unfortunately, models trained purely on rendered images fail to generalize to real images. To address this shortcoming, prior work introduced unsupervised domain adaptation algorithms that have tried to either map representations between the two domains, or learn to extract features that are domain-invariant. In this work, we approach the problem in a new light by learning in an unsupervised manner a transformation in the pixel space from one domain to the other. Our generative adversarial network (GAN)-based method adapts source-domain images to appear as if drawn from the target domain. Our approach not only produces plausible samples, but also outperforms the state-of-the-art on a number of unsupervised domain adaptation scenarios by large margins. Finally, we demonstrate that the adaptation process generalizes to object classes unseen during training. Konstantinos Bousmalis, Nathan Silberman, David Dohan, Dumitru Erhan, Dilip Krishnan |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2016 | Domain Separation NetworksabstractThe cost of large scale data collection and annotation often makes the application of machine learning algorithms to new tasks or datasets prohibitively expensive. One approach circumventing this cost is training models on synthetic data where annotations are provided automatically. Despite their appeal, such models often fail to generalize from synthetic to real images, necessitating domain adaptation algorithms to manipulate these models before they can be successfully applied. Existing approaches focus either on mapping representations from one domain to the other, or on learning to extract features that are invariant to the domain from which they were extracted. However, by focusing only on creating a mapping or shared representation between the two domains, they ignore the individual characteristics of each domain. We hypothesize that explicitly modeling what is unique to each domain can improve a model's ability to extract domain-invariant features. Inspired by work on private-shared component analysis, we explicitly learn to extract image representations that are partitioned into two subspaces: one component which is private to each domain and one which is shared across domains. Our model is trained to not only perform the task we care about in the source domain, but also to use the partitioned representation to reconstruct the images from both domains. Our novel architecture results in a model that outperforms the state-of-the-art on a range of unsupervised domain adaptation scenarios and additionally produces visualizations of the private and shared representations enabling interpretation of the domain adaptation process. Konstantinos Bousmalis, George Trigeorgis, Nathan Silberman, Dilip Krishnan, Dumitru Erhan |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2015 | Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food DiaryabstractWe present a system which can recognize the contents of your meal from a single image, and then predict its nutritional contents, such as calories. The simplest version assumes that the user is eating at a restaurant for which we know the menu. In this case, we can collect images offline to train a multi-label classifier. At run time, we apply the classifier (running on your phone) to predict which foods are present in your meal, and we lookup the corresponding nutritional facts. We apply this method to a new dataset of images from 23 different restaurants, using a CNN-based classifier, significantly outperforming previous work. The more challenging setting works outside of restaurants. In this case, we need to estimate the size of the foods, as well as their labels. This requires solving segmentation and depth / volume estimation from a single image. We present CNN-based approaches to these problems, with promising preliminary results. Austin Myers, Nicholas Johnston, Vivek Rathod, Anoop Korattikara Balan, Alexander N. Gorban, Nathan Silberman, Sergio Guadarrama, George Papandreou, Jonathan Huang, Kevin Murphy 0002 |
ICCV | 6 |
| 2014 | Instance Segmentation of Indoor Scenes Using a Coverage Loss
Nathan Silberman, David A. Sontag, Rob Fergus |
ECCV (1) | 1 |
| 2014 | A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions
Nathan Silberman, Lior Shapira, Ran Gal, Pushmeet Kohli |
ECCV (3) | 1 |
| 2012 | Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images
Nathan Silberman, Derek Hoiem, Pushmeet Kohli, Rob Fergus |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2009 | Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy ModelsabstractTraining conditional maximum entropy models on massive data requires significant time and computational resources. In this paper, we investigate three common distributed training strategies: distributed gradient, majority voting ensembles, and parameter mixtures. We analyze the worst-case runtime and resource costs of each and present a theoretical foundation for the convergence of parameters under parameter mixtures, the most efficient strategy. We present large-scale experiments comparing the different strategies and demonstrate that parameter mixtures over independent models use fewer resources and achieve comparable loss as compared to standard approaches. Gideon Mann, Ryan T. McDonald, Mehryar Mohri, Nathan Silberman, Dan Walker |
NIPS | 4 |