Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan Silberman

dblp:75/10432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-8498-5796ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Generative modeling · 14% Learning theory · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.722019
The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019
Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
0.522017
Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017
Domain Separation Networks · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
annotator modeling
0.412019
Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion · CVPR 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.412019
The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels
0.412019
Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion · CVPR 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.412019
The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation
0.312018
ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations · ECCV (10) 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312018
ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations · ECCV (10) 2018
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
image-to-image translation
0.312017
Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › visual domain adaptation
pixel-level domain adaptation
0.312017
Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
food recognition
0.212015
Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › object segmentation
food segmentation
0.212015
Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › perceptual grouping
contour completion
0.212014
A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions · ECCV (3) 2014
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation
0.212014
Instance Segmentation of Indoor Scenes Using a Coverage Loss · ECCV (1) 2014
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
surface reconstruction
0.212014
A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions · ECCV (3) 2014
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
indoor scene segmentation
0.112012
Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images · ECCV (5) 2012
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.112009
Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › exponential family
maximum entropy models
0.112009
Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging
0.112009
Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
domain-invariant representation
0.112016
Domain Separation Networks · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory
loss function
0.112014
Instance Segmentation of Indoor Scenes Using a Coverage Loss · ECCV (1) 2014
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction
0.112014
A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions · ECCV (3) 2014
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
RGB-D scene understanding
0.012012
Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images · ECCV (5) 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
support estimation
0.012012
Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images · ECCV (5) 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inter-annotator agreement · 0.4discrepancy ratio · 0.4regularization · 0.4confusion matrix estimation · 0.4decision boundary crossing · 0.3GAN · 0.3pixel-space transformation · 0.3generative adversarial network · 0.3private-shared component analysis · 0.2domain separation · 0.2multi-label classification · 0.2convolutional neural network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Discrepancy Ratio: Evaluating Model Performance When Even Experts Disagree on the Truth
Igor Lovchinsky, Alon Daks, Israel Malkin, Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Tomer Gafner, Ben Sternlieb, Patrick Maher, Nathan Silberman
ICLR11
2019 Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion
abstract
The predictive performance of supervised learning algorithms depends on the quality of labels. In a typical label collection process, multiple annotators provide subjective noisy estimates of the ``truth" under the influence of their varying skill-levels and biases. Blindly treating these noisy labels as the ground truth limits the accuracy of learning algorithms in the presence of strong disagreement. This problem is critical for applications in domains such as medical imaging where both the annotation cost and inter-observer variability are high. In this work, we present a method for simultaneously learning the individual annotator model and the underlying true label distribution, using only noisy observations. Each annotator is modeled by a confusion matrix that is jointly estimated along with the classifier predictions. We propose to add a regularization term to the loss function that encourages convergence to the true annotator confusion matrix. We provide a theoretical argument as to how the regularization is essential to our approach both for the case of single annotator and multiple annotators. Despite the simplicity of the idea, experiments on image classification tasks with both simulated and real labels show that our method either outperforms or performs on par with the state-of-the-art methods and is capable of estimating the skills of annotators even with a single label available per image.
Ryutaro Tanno, Ardavan Saeedi, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Daniel C. Alexander, Nathan Silberman
CVPR5
2019 The Devil is in the Decoder: Classification, Regression and GANs
Zbigniew Wojna, Vittorio Ferrari, Sergio Guadarrama, Nathan Silberman, Liang-Chieh Chen, Alireza Fathi, Jasper R. R. Uijlings
Int. J. Comput. Vis.4
2018 ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations
Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, Liam Nakagawa, Nathan Silberman
ECCV (10)4
2017 The Devil is in the Decoder
Zbigniew Wojna, Jasper R. R. Uijlings, Sergio Guadarrama, Nathan Silberman, Liang-Chieh Chen, Alireza Fathi, Vittorio Ferrari
BMVC4
2017 Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networks
abstract
Collecting well-annotated image datasets to train modern machine learning algorithms is prohibitively expensive for many tasks. One appealing alternative is rendering synthetic data where ground-truth annotations are generated automatically. Unfortunately, models trained purely on rendered images fail to generalize to real images. To address this shortcoming, prior work introduced unsupervised domain adaptation algorithms that have tried to either map representations between the two domains, or learn to extract features that are domain-invariant. In this work, we approach the problem in a new light by learning in an unsupervised manner a transformation in the pixel space from one domain to the other. Our generative adversarial network (GAN)-based method adapts source-domain images to appear as if drawn from the target domain. Our approach not only produces plausible samples, but also outperforms the state-of-the-art on a number of unsupervised domain adaptation scenarios by large margins. Finally, we demonstrate that the adaptation process generalizes to object classes unseen during training.
Konstantinos Bousmalis, Nathan Silberman, David Dohan, Dumitru Erhan, Dilip Krishnan
CVPR2
2016 Domain Separation Networks
abstract
The cost of large scale data collection and annotation often makes the application of machine learning algorithms to new tasks or datasets prohibitively expensive. One approach circumventing this cost is training models on synthetic data where annotations are provided automatically. Despite their appeal, such models often fail to generalize from synthetic to real images, necessitating domain adaptation algorithms to manipulate these models before they can be successfully applied. Existing approaches focus either on mapping representations from one domain to the other, or on learning to extract features that are invariant to the domain from which they were extracted. However, by focusing only on creating a mapping or shared representation between the two domains, they ignore the individual characteristics of each domain. We hypothesize that explicitly modeling what is unique to each domain can improve a model's ability to extract domain-invariant features. Inspired by work on private-shared component analysis, we explicitly learn to extract image representations that are partitioned into two subspaces: one component which is private to each domain and one which is shared across domains. Our model is trained to not only perform the task we care about in the source domain, but also to use the partitioned representation to reconstruct the images from both domains. Our novel architecture results in a model that outperforms the state-of-the-art on a range of unsupervised domain adaptation scenarios and additionally produces visualizations of the private and shared representations enabling interpretation of the domain adaptation process.
Konstantinos Bousmalis, George Trigeorgis, Nathan Silberman, Dilip Krishnan, Dumitru Erhan
NIPS3
2015 Im2Calories: Towards an Automated Mobile Vision Food Diary
abstract
We present a system which can recognize the contents of your meal from a single image, and then predict its nutritional contents, such as calories. The simplest version assumes that the user is eating at a restaurant for which we know the menu. In this case, we can collect images offline to train a multi-label classifier. At run time, we apply the classifier (running on your phone) to predict which foods are present in your meal, and we lookup the corresponding nutritional facts. We apply this method to a new dataset of images from 23 different restaurants, using a CNN-based classifier, significantly outperforming previous work. The more challenging setting works outside of restaurants. In this case, we need to estimate the size of the foods, as well as their labels. This requires solving segmentation and depth / volume estimation from a single image. We present CNN-based approaches to these problems, with promising preliminary results.
Austin Myers, Nicholas Johnston, Vivek Rathod, Anoop Korattikara Balan, Alexander N. Gorban, Nathan Silberman, Sergio Guadarrama, George Papandreou, Jonathan Huang, Kevin Murphy 0002
ICCV6
2014 Instance Segmentation of Indoor Scenes Using a Coverage Loss
Nathan Silberman, David A. Sontag, Rob Fergus
ECCV (1)1
2014 A Contour Completion Model for Augmenting Surface Reconstructions
Nathan Silberman, Lior Shapira, Ran Gal, Pushmeet Kohli
ECCV (3)1
2012 Indoor Segmentation and Support Inference from RGBD Images
Nathan Silberman, Derek Hoiem, Pushmeet Kohli, Rob Fergus
ECCV (5)1
2009 Efficient Large-Scale Distributed Training of Conditional Maximum Entropy Models
abstract
Training conditional maximum entropy models on massive data requires significant time and computational resources. In this paper, we investigate three common distributed training strategies: distributed gradient, majority voting ensembles, and parameter mixtures. We analyze the worst-case runtime and resource costs of each and present a theoretical foundation for the convergence of parameters under parameter mixtures, the most efficient strategy. We present large-scale experiments comparing the different strategies and demonstrate that parameter mixtures over independent models use fewer resources and achieve comparable loss as compared to standard approaches.
Gideon Mann, Ryan T. McDonald, Mehryar Mohri, Nathan Silberman, Dan Walker
NIPS4