Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Bluethmann

dblp:75/3621 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 71% Robot manipulation · 29%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Human-robot interaction · 55% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 45%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.112006
Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.122006
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
teleoperation
0.122003
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Kinesthetic and Visual Force Display for Telerobotics · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012003
Robonaut task learning through teleoperation · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
shared control
0.012003
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Human-robot interaction
learning from demonstration
0.012003
Robonaut task learning through teleoperation · ICRA 2003
Human-robot interaction
robot learning
0.012003
Robonaut task learning through teleoperation · ICRA 2003
Haptics and multimodal interaction
tactile sensing
0.012003
Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system · ICRA 2003
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic feedback
force feedback
0.012002
Kinesthetic and Visual Force Display for Telerobotics · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
reach-to-grasp
0.012006
Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2006
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
virtual reality teleoperation
0.012003
Robonaut task learning through teleoperation · ICRA 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual object tracking · 0.1time-series segmentation · 0.1teleoperation · 0.1episode averaging · 0.1compliance control · 0.1stereo display · 0.1force reflection · 0.1verbs and adverbs algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Superpositioning of behaviors learned through teleoperation
abstract
This paper reports that the superposition of a small set of behaviors, learned via teleoperation, can lead to robust completion of an articulated reach-and-grasp task. The results support the hypothesis that a robot can learn to interact purposefully with its environment through a developmental acquisition of sensory-motor coordination. Teleoperation can bootstrap the process by enabling the robot to observe its own sensory responses to actions that lead to specific outcomes within an environment. It is shown that a reach-and-grasp task, learned by an articulated robot through a small number of teleoperated trials, can be performed autonomously with success in the face of significant variations in the environment and perturbations of the goal. In particular, teleoperation of the robot to reach and grasp an object at nine different locations in its workspace enabled robust autonomous performance of the task anywhere within the workspace. Superpositioning was performed using the Verbs and Adverbs algorithm that was developed originally for the graphical animation of articulated characters. The work was performed on Robonaut, the NASA space-capable humanoid at Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX.
Christina L. Campbell, Richard Alan Peters II, Bobby Bodenheimer, William Bluethmann, Eric Huber, Robert O. Ambrose
IEEE Trans. Robotics4
2003 Evolution of the NASA/DARPA robonaut control system
abstract
The NASA/DARPA Robonaut system is evolving from a purely teleoperator controlled anthropomorphic robot towards a humanoid system with multiple control pathways. Robonaut is a human scale robot designed to approach the dexterity of a space suited astronaut. Under teleoperator control, Robonaut has been able to perform many high payoff tasks indicating that it could significantly reduce the maintenance workload for human's working in space. Throughout its development, Robonaut has been augmented to include new sensors and software resulting in increased skills that allow for more shared control with the teleoperator, and ever increasing levels of autonomy. These skills range from simple compliance control, and short term memory, to, most recently, reflexive grasping and haptic object identification using a custom tactile glove, and real-time visual object tracking.
Myron A. Diftler, Robert Platt 0001, C. J. Culbert, Robert O. Ambrose, William Bluethmann
ICRA5
2003 Robonaut task learning through teleoperation
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of automatic skill acquisition by a robot. It reports that six trials of a reach-grasp-release-retract skill are sufficient for learning a canonical description of the task under the following circumstances: The robot is Robonaut, NASA's space-capable, dexterous humanoid. Robonaut was teleoperated by a person using full immersion Virtual Reality technology that transforms the operator's arm and hand motions into those of the robot. The operator's sole source of real-time feedback was visual. During the six trials all of the Robot's sensory inputs and motor control parameters were recorded as time-series. Later the time-series from each trial was partitioned into the same number of episodes as a function of changes in the motor parameter sequence. The episodes were time normalized and averaged across trials The resultant motor parameter sequence and sensor signals were used to control the robot without the teleoperator. The robot was able to perform the task autonomously with robot starting positions and object locations both similar to, and different from the original trials.
Richard Alan Peters II, Christina L. Campbell, William Bluethmann, Eric Huber
ICRA3
2002 Kinesthetic and Visual Force Display for Telerobotics
abstract
Effectively controlling a robot remotely, teleoperation, offers benefits in improving human safety, reducing workload, providing location accessibility, and achieving convenient operation. In previous work, teleoperator task performance has been shown to improve with the addition of force feedback. Here we report on a system providing a human operator with a six-axis kinesthetic and visual force display, its implementation and experimental evaluation. A system design containing both a six-axis force reflective hand controller and a stereo video head-mounted display with 3D force display overlay is presented. The system was utilized to evaluate the effects of force display augmentation and substitution by controlling a dexterous anthropomorphic robot called "Robonaut" in the performance of a typical space teleoperation drill task. The human test subject performance under four different force feedback scenarios, no force display, visual force display, kinesthetic force display and bisensory force display, is measured. Experimental results indicate a noticeably lower cumulative force, torque, and variance, lower peak force/torque, yet unchanged task completion times under the presence of visual or kinesthetic force display.
Lorraine E. P. Williams, R. Bowen Loftin, Hal A. Aldridge, Ernst L. Leiss, William Bluethmann
ICRA5