Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James J. Pomykalski

dblp:75/5606 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge-based systems
0.011995
Reliability Estimation During Prototyping of Knowledge-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1995
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › model reliability
reliability estimation
0.011995
Reliability Estimation During Prototyping of Knowledge-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partitioning · 0.0general systems theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Reliability Estimation During Prototyping of Knowledge-Based Systems
abstract
Many knowledge based systems are designed and built with little attention paid to the reliability of the output. In this paper, we present an approach, using partitioning of both the knowledge base and the input space, that allows for the measurement of the reliability during any program increment in a rapid prototyping development cycle. Before presenting the approach, we formalize the problem using concepts from general systems theory and then describe our three objectives: 1) measurement of the reliability of the knowledge-based system at the current program increment, 2) prediction of the reliability of the future system, and 3) support for design decisions. Finally, we apply our approach to a design-aiding knowledge-based system for the selection of materials under various climatic conditions. The design-aiding knowledge-based system is used by U.S. Army personnel in the development of equipment to be used by the U.S. Army in various regions of the world. We find that the current system, containing 40 rules, has a reliability of approximately 0.85. However, more importantly, we have discovered the rules that led to many of the failures.>
Donald E. Brown, James J. Pomykalski
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2