Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kris Mork

dblp:75/972 · also Peter Mork · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
26ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 15 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 12 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
7 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 69% Data models and query languages · 10% Knowledge graphs · 5%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
schema matching
0.232010
Exploring schema similarity at multiple resolutions · SIGMOD Conference 2010
Interactive Schema Translation with Instance-Level Mappings · VLDB 2005
Adapting a Generic Match Algorithm to Align Ontologies of Human Anatomy · ICDE 2004
Data integration and cleaning
schema similarity
0.112010
Exploring schema similarity at multiple resolutions · SIGMOD Conference 2010
Data integration and cleaning › data integration system
multidatabase query
0.112009
Galaxy: Encouraging Data Sharing among Sources with Schema Variants · ICDE 2009
Data models and query languages
schema management
0.112009
Galaxy: Encouraging Data Sharing among Sources with Schema Variants · ICDE 2009
Data integration and cleaning
schema mapping
0.122004
Piazza: data management infrastructure for semantic web applications · WWW 2003
The Piazza Peer Data Management System · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2004
Data integration and cleaning
schema translation
0.112005
Interactive Schema Translation with Instance-Level Mappings · VLDB 2005
Knowledge graphs › ontology
ontology matching
0.012004
Adapting a Generic Match Algorithm to Align Ontologies of Human Anatomy · ICDE 2004
Distributed and cloud data management
peer-to-peer data management
0.012004
The Piazza Peer Data Management System · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2004
Database theory
query answering
0.012004
The Piazza Peer Data Management System · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2004
Data integration and cleaning › information mediation
schema mediation
0.012004
The Piazza Peer Data Management System · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2004
Graph data management › graph data model
RDF data model
0.012003
Piazza: data management infrastructure for semantic web applications · WWW 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology-based data integration
0.012003
Piazza: data management infrastructure for semantic web applications · WWW 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

schema versioning · 0.1query answering · 0.1mapping chaining · 0.1structural matching · 0.0lexical matching · 0.0hierarchical matching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 OpenII: an open source information integration toolkit
abstract
OpenII (openintegration.org) is a collaborative effort to create a suite of open-source tools for information integration (II). The project is leveraging the latest developments in II research to create a platform on which integration tools can be built and further research conducted. In addition to a scalable, extensible platform, OpenII includes industrial-strength components developed by MITRE, Google, UC-Irvine, and UC-Berkeley that interoperate through a common repository in order to solve II problems. Components of the toolkit have been successfully applied to several large-scale US government II challenges.
Leonard J. Seligman, Kris Mork, Alon Y. Halevy, Kenneth P. Smith, Michael J. Carey 0001, Kuang Chen, Chris Wolf, Jayant Madhavan, Akshay Kannan, Douglas Burdick
SIGMOD Conference2
2010 Exploring schema similarity at multiple resolutions
abstract
Large, dynamic, and ad-hoc organizations must frequently initiate data integration and sharing efforts with insufficient awareness of how organizational data sources are related. Decision makers need to reason about data model interactions much as they do about data instance interactions in OLAP: at multiple levels of granularity. We demonstrate an integrated environment for exploring schema similarity across multiple resolutions. Users visualize and interact with clusters of related schemas using a tool named Affinity. Within any cluster, users may drill-down to examine the extent and content of schema overlap. Further drill down enables users to explore fine-grained element-level correspondences between between two selected schemas.
Kenneth P. Smith, Craig Bonaceto, Chris Wolf, Beth Yost, Michael Morse, Kris Mork, Douglas Burdick
SIGMOD Conference6
2010 Cloud computing: A new business paradigm for biomedical information sharing
Arnon Rosenthal, Kris Mork, Maya Hao Li, Jean Stanford, David Koester, Patti Reynolds
J. Biomed. Informatics2
2009 The Role of Schema Matching in Large Enterprises
Kenneth P. Smith, Michael Morse, Kris Mork, Maya Hao Li, Arnon Rosenthal, M. David Allen, Leonard J. Seligman
CIDR3
2009 Galaxy: Encouraging Data Sharing among Sources with Schema Variants
abstract
This demonstration presents Galaxy, a schema manager that facilitates easy and correct data sharing among autonomous but related, evolving data sources. Galaxy reduces heterogeneity by helping database developers identify, reuse, customize, and advertise related schema components. The central idea is that as schemata are customized, Galaxy maintains a derivation graph, and exploits it for data exchange, discovery, and multi-database query over the "galaxy" of related data sources. Using a set of schemata from the biomedical domain, we demonstrate how Galaxy facilitates schema and data sharing.
Kris Mork, Leonard J. Seligman, Arnon Rosenthal, Michael Morse, Chris Wolf, Jeffrey Hoyt, Kenneth P. Smith
ICDE1
2008 Facilitating discovery on the private web using dataset digests
abstract
Whereas strategies for discovering content on the surface web are commonplace, similar strategies for the private web are nonexistent. In this paper we first establish a formal framework for advertising the existence of private web resources that subsumes many existing summarization strategies based on succinct statistical summaries (which we call digests). We then investigate the tradeoff between the data owners' desires to minimize disclosure and the searchers' desires to minimize query error, demonstrating that our techniques are superior to k-anonymity. Finally, we show that our techniques for summarization do, in fact, make it possible to discover private web data resources.
Kris Mork, Kenneth P. Smith, Barbara T. Blaustein, Chris Wolf, Keri Sarver
iiWAS1
2007 Teaching a Schema Translator to Produce O/R Views
Kris Mork, Philip A. Bernstein, Sergey Melnik 0001
ER1
2007 Comparing two approaches for aligning representations of anatomy
Songmao Zhang, Kris Mork, Olivier Bodenreider, Philip A. Bernstein
Artif. Intell. Medicine2
2007 Data integration and genomic medicine
abstract
Genomic medicine aims to revolutionize health care by applying our growing understanding of the molecular basis of disease. Research in this arena is data intensive, which means data sets are large and highly heterogeneous. To create knowledge from data, researchers must integrate these large and diverse data sets. This presents daunting informatic challenges such as representation of data that is suitable for computational inference (knowledge representation), and linking heterogeneous data sets (data integration). Fortunately, many of these challenges can be classified as data integration problems, and technologies exist in the area of data integration that may be applied to these challenges. In this paper, we discuss the opportunities of genomic medicine as well as identify the informatics challenges in this domain. We also review concepts and methodologies in the field of data integration. These data integration concepts and methodologies are then aligned with informatics challenges in genomic medicine and presented as potential solutions. We conclude this paper with challenges still not addressed in genomic medicine and gaps that remain in data integration research to facilitate genomic medicine.
Brenton Louie, Kris Mork, Fernando Martín-Sánchez, Alon Y. Halevy, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
J. Biomed. Informatics2
2005 Integration of Data for Gene Annotation Using the BioMediator System
Brenton Louie, Kris Mork, Ron Shaker, Natali Kolker, Eugene Kolker, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
AMIA2
2005 BioMediator Data Integration: Beyond Genomics to Neuroscience Data
Kelan Wang, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, Ron Shaker, Kris Mork, James F. Brinkley
AMIA4
2005 Knowledge transformations between frame systems and RDB systems
abstract
For decades, researchers in knowledge representation (KR) have argued for and against various choices in KR formalisms, such as Rules, Frames, Semantic nets, and Formal logic. In this paper, we present a set of transformations that can be used to move knowledge across two fundamentally different KR formalisms: Frame-based systems and Relational database systems (RDBs). We also describe partial implementations of these transformations for a specific pair of such systems: Protégé and the Postgres RDB system.
John H. Gennari, Kris Mork
K-CAP2
2005 Interactive Schema Translation with Instance-Level Mappings
Philip A. Bernstein, Sergey Melnik 0001, Kris Mork
VLDB3
2004 Adapting a Generic Match Algorithm to Align Ontologies of Human Anatomy
abstract
The difficulty inherent in schema matching has led to the development of several generic match algorithms. We describe how we adapted general approaches to the specific task of aligning two ontologies of human anatomy, the Foundational Model of Anatomy and the GALEN Common Reference Model. Our approach consists of three phases: lexical, structural and hierarchical, which leverage different aspects of the ontologies as they are represented in a generic meta-model. Lexical matching identifies concepts with similar names. Structural matching identifies concepts whose neighbors are similar. Finally, hierarchical matching identifies concepts with similar descendants. We conclude by reporting on the lessons we learned.
Kris Mork, Philip A. Bernstein
ICDE1
2004 The Piazza Peer Data Management System
abstract
Intuitively, data management and data integration tools are well-suited for exchanging information in a semantically meaningful way. Unfortunately, they suffer from two significant problems: They typically require a comprehensive schema design before they can be used to store or share information and they are difficult to extend because schema evolution is heavyweight and may break backward compatibility. As a result, many small-scale data sharing tasks are more easily facilitated by nondatabase-oriented tools that have little support for semantics. The goal of the peer data management system (PDMS) is to address this need: We propose the use of a decentralized, easily extensible data management architecture in which any user can contribute new data, schema information, or even mappings between other peers' schemes. PDMSs represent a natural step beyond data integration systems, replacing their single logical schema with an interlinked collection of semantic mappings between peers' individual schemas. This paper describes-several aspects of the Piazza PDMS, including the schema mediation formalism, query answering and optimization algorithms, and the relevance of PDMSs to the semantic Web.
Alon Y. Halevy, Zachary G. Ives, Jayant Madhavan, Kris Mork, Dan Suciu, Igor Tatarinov
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.4
2004 Piazza: mediation and integration infrastructure for Semantic Web data
Zachary G. Ives, Alon Y. Halevy, Kris Mork, Igor Tatarinov
J. Web Semant.3
2003 Expression Array Annotation Using the BioMediator Biological Data Integration System and the BioConductor Analytic Platform
Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, Kris Mork, Anthony J. Rossini, Ron Shaker, Loren Donelson
AMIA3
2003 Piazza: data management infrastructure for semantic web applications
abstract
The Semantic Web envisions a World Wide Web in which data is described with rich semantics and applications can pose complex queries. To this point, researchers have defined new languages for specifying meanings for concepts and developed techniques for reasoning about them, using RDF as the data model. To flourish, the Semantic Web needs to be able to accommodate the huge amounts of existing data and the applications operating on them. To achieve this, we are faced with two problems. First, most of the world's data is available not in RDF but in XML; XML and the applications consuming it rely not only on the domain structure of the data, but also on its document structure. Hence, to provide interoperability between such sources, we must map between both their domain structures and their document structures. Second, data management practitioners often prefer to exchange data through local point-to-point data translations, rather than mapping to common mediated schemas or ontologies.This paper describes the Piazza system, which addresses these challenges. Piazza offers a language for mediating between data sources on the Semantic Web, which maps both the domain structure and document structure. Piazza also enables interoperation of XML data with RDF data that is accompanied by rich OWL ontologies. Mappings in Piazza are provided at a local scale between small sets of nodes, and our query answering algorithm is able to chain sets mappings together to obtain relevant data from across the Piazza network. We also describe an implemented scenario in Piazza and the lessons we learned from it.
Alon Y. Halevy, Zachary G. Ives, Kris Mork, Igor Tatarinov
WWW3
2003 OQAFMA Querying Agent for the Foundational Model of Anatomy: a prototype for providing flexible and efficient access to large semantic networks
Kris Mork, James F. Brinkley, Cornelius Rosse
J. Biomed. Informatics1
2002 A Declarative Query Interface for Large Semantic Networks
Kris Mork, Dan Suciu, James F. Brinkley, Cornelius Rosse
AMIA1
2002 PQL: a declarative query language over dynamic biological schemata
Kris Mork, Ron Shaker, Alon Y. Halevy, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
AMIA1
2002 A rule driven bi-directional translation system for remapping queries and result sets between a mediated schema and heterogeneous data sources
Ron Shaker, Kris Mork, Matt Barclay, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
AMIA2
2001 A model for data integration systems of biomedical data applied to online genetic databases
Kris Mork, Alon Y. Halevy, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
AMIA1
2001 Modification of GEM to Accommodate Changes in a Classification Scheme
Richard Phillips, Elmer V. Bernstam, Kris Mork, Bryant Thomas Karras
AMIA3
2000 Guideline classification to assist modeling, authoring, implementation and retrieval
Elmer V. Bernstam, Nachman Ash, Mor Peleg, Samson W. Tu, Aziz A. Boxwala, Kris Mork, Edward H. Shortliffe, Robert A. Greenes
AMIA6
2000 GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format
Mor Peleg, Aziz A. Boxwala, Omolola Ogunyemi, Qing T. Zeng, Samson W. Tu, Ronilda C. Lacson, Elmer V. Bernstam, Nachman Ash, Kris Mork, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Edward H. Shortliffe, Robert A. Greenes
AMIA9