Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jerry Bautista

dblp:76/1066 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 50% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › multi-chip architecture
3d stacking
0.112008
Tera-scale computing and interconnect challenges · DAC 2008
Memory systems
memory interconnect
0.112008
Tera-scale computing and interconnect challenges · DAC 2008
Memory systems › memory architecture
memory latency and bandwidth
0.012008
Tera-scale computing and interconnect challenges · DAC 2008
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multicore design
0.012008
Tera-scale computing and interconnect challenges · DAC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

3D stacking of CPU and memory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Tera-scale computing and interconnect challenges
abstract
Future CPU directions are increasingly emphasizing parallel compute platforms which are critically dependent upon upon greater core to core communication as well as generally stressing the overall memory and storage interconnect hierarchy to a much greater degree than extrapolations of past platform needs. Performance is critically dependent upon memory bandwidth and latency but must be moderated with power and cost considerations. 3D stacking of CPU's and memory (i.e. a last level cache) is a potential solution that provides the necessary bandwidth within a reasonable power envelope.
Jerry Bautista
DAC1
2008 More Moore: foolish, feasible, or fundamentally different?
abstract
Moore’s law has been a foundation of modern electronics, sustained primarily by scaling. But can this continue despite the serious problems of litho, variability, device physics, and cost? This panel looks at several possibilities. Perhaps Moore’s law will muddle through, as it has so far, with a combination of tools, process, and design. But even if technically possible, Moore’s law is in practice driven by economics, and economics might turn against further scaling. Also, we’ve all seen how performance of single cores has topped out, despite scaling. Might this be a fundamental problem with planar technologies, prompting the need to go 3-D to get further performance increases? Or might CMOS itself give way to other technologies, allowing Moore’s law yet another respite? Compare and contrast for yourself these four very different visions of the future of your job, your industry, and your personal gadgets.
Robert C. Aitken, Jerry Bautista, Wojciech Maly, Jan M. Rabaey
ICCAD2