Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan-Peter von Hunnius

dblp:76/1664 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
knowledge management
0.012003
Effective Experience Repositories for Software Engineering · ICSE 2003
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Effective Experience Repositories for Software Engineering
abstract
Software development and acquisition require knowledge and experience in many areas of software engineering. Experience helps people to make decisions under uncertainty, and to find better compromises. Experience-based process improvement considers experience as a prerequisite for competent behavior in software development. There is usually a repository to store experiences and to make it available for reuse. At DaimlerChrysler, we have been building those repositories for more than five years. We learned to concentrate on certain properties that seem to be key success factors for experience repositories. During our experience-based work in business units, five key quality aspects have been identified that determine the chances for success of an experience repository. The quality criteria can be used to analyze a given repository; or they can be applied to guide the construction of more effective experience repositories.
Kurt Schneider, Jan-Peter von Hunnius
ICSE2