Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dung-Tsa Chen

dblp:76/2454 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study
0.622018
AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non-hierarchical additive model set · Bioinform. 2018
SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › gene-gene interaction
SNP interaction analysis
0.622018
AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non-hierarchical additive model set · Bioinform. 2018
SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.122005
Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2005
Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › differential expression analysis
differentially expressed gene identification
0.122005
Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates · Bioinform. 2005
Gene selection for oligonucleotide array: an approach using PM probe level data · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
prostate cancer
0.112017
SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.122005
Gene selection for oligonucleotide array: an approach using PM probe level data · Bioinform. 2004
Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.112005
Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray experimental design
0.112005
Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
probe-level analysis
0.112005
Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics
sample size determination
0.112005
Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing › probe-level analysis
probe signal normalization
0.012004
Gene selection for oligonucleotide array: an approach using PM probe level data · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-hierarchical model · 0.6parallel computing · 0.3additive mode · 0.3inheritance mode coding · 0.3probe rank · 0.1percentile comparison · 0.1monte carlo simulation · 0.1binomial model · 0.1beta-binomial model · 0.1filtering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 PATH-SURVEYOR: pathway level survival enquiry for immuno-oncology and drug repurposing
abstract
Pathway-level survival analysis offers the opportunity to examine molecular pathways and immune signatures that influence patient outcomes. However, available survival analysis algorithms are limited in pathway-level function and lack a streamlined analytical process. Here we present a comprehensive pathway-level survival analysis suite, PATH-SURVEYOR, which includes a Shiny user interface with extensive features for systematic exploration of pathways and covariates in a Cox proportional-hazard model. Moreover, our framework offers an integrative strategy for performing Hazard Ratio ranked Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and pathway clustering. As an example, we applied our tool in a combined cohort of melanoma patients treated with checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and identified several immune populations and biomarkers predictive of ICI efficacy. We also analyzed gene expression data of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and performed an inverse association of drug targets with the patient's clinical endpoint. Our analysis derived several drug targets in high-risk KMT2A-fusion-positive patients, which were then validated in AML cell lines in the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity database. Altogether, the tool offers a comprehensive suite for pathway-level survival analysis and a user interface for exploring drug targets, molecular features, and immune populations at different resolutions.
Alyssa N. Obermayer, Darwin Chang, Gabrielle Nobles, Mingxiang Teng, Aik Choon Tan, Y. Ann Chen, Steven Eschrich, Paulo C. Rodriguez, G. Daniel Grass, Soheil Meschinchi, Ahmad Tarhini, Dung-Tsa Chen, Timothy I. Shaw
BMC Bioinform.13
2018 AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non-hierarchical additive model set
abstract
Motivation: The use of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interactions to predict complex diseases is getting more attention during the past decade, but related statistical methods are still immature. We previously proposed the SNP Interaction Pattern Identifier (SIPI) approach to evaluate 45 SNP interaction patterns/patterns. SIPI is statistically powerful but suffers from a large computation burden. For large-scale studies, it is necessary to use a powerful and computation-efficient method. The objective of this study is to develop an evidence-based mini-version of SIPI as the screening tool or solitary use and to evaluate the impact of inheritance mode and model structure on detecting SNP-SNP interactions. Results: We tested two candidate approaches: the 'Five-Full' and 'AA9int' method. The Five-Full approach is composed of the five full interaction models considering three inheritance modes (additive, dominant and recessive). The AA9int approach is composed of nine interaction models by considering non-hierarchical model structure and the additive mode. Our simulation results show that AA9int has similar statistical power compared to SIPI and is superior to the Five-Full approach, and the impact of the non-hierarchical model structure is greater than that of the inheritance mode in detecting SNP-SNP interactions. In summary, it is recommended that AA9int is a powerful tool to be used either alone or as the screening stage of a two-stage approach (AA9int+SIPI) for detecting SNP-SNP interactions in large-scale studies. Availability and implementation: The 'AA9int' and 'parAA9int' functions (standard and parallel computing version) are added in the SIPI R package, which is freely available at https://linhuiyi.github.io/LinHY_Software/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hui-Yi Lin, Po-Yu Huang, Dung-Tsa Chen, Heng-Yuan Tung, Thomas A. Sellers, Julio M. Pow-Sang, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G. Giles, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A. Haiman, Johanna Schleutker, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Ruth C. Travis, Freddie Hamdy, David E. Neal, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L. Stanford, William J. Blot, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Christiane Maier, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Radka Kaneva, Jyotsna Batra, Manuel R. Teixeira, Hardev Pandha, Yong-Jie Lu, Jong Y. Park
Bioinform.3
2017 SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns
abstract
Motivation: Testing SNP-SNP interactions is considered as a key for overcoming bottlenecks of genetic association studies. However, related statistical methods for testing SNP-SNP interactions are underdeveloped. Results: We propose the SNP Interaction Pattern Identifier (SIPI), which tests 45 biologically meaningful interaction patterns for a binary outcome. SIPI takes non-hierarchical models, inheritance modes and mode coding direction into consideration. The simulation results show that SIPI has higher power than MDR (Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction), AA_Full, Geno_Full (full interaction model with additive or genotypic mode) and SNPassoc in detecting interactions. Applying SIPI to the prostate cancer PRACTICAL consortium data with approximately 21 000 patients, the four SNP pairs in EGFR-EGFR , EGFR-MMP16 and EGFR-CSF1 were found to be associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness with the exact or similar pattern in the discovery and validation sets. A similar match for external validation of SNP-SNP interaction studies is suggested. We demonstrated that SIPI not only searches for more meaningful interaction patterns but can also overcome the unstable nature of interaction patterns. Availability and Implementation: The SIPI software is freely available at http://publichealth.lsuhsc.edu/LinSoftware/ . Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hui-Yi Lin, Dung-Tsa Chen, Po-Yu Huang, Yung-Hsin Liu, Augusto Ochoa, Jovanny Zabaleta, Donald Mercante, Zhide Fang, Thomas A. Sellers, Julio M. Pow-Sang, Chia-Ho Cheng, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G. Giles, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A. Haiman, Johanna Schleutker, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Ruth C. Travis, Freddie Hamdy, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L. Stanford, William J. Blot, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Christiane Maier, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Radka Kaneva, Jyotsna Batra, Manuel R. Teixeira, Hardev Pandha, Yong-Jie Lu, Jong Y. Park
Bioinform.2
2005 Probe rank approaches for gene selection in oligonucleotide arrays with a small number of replicates
abstract
MOTIVATION: One major area of interest in analyzing oligonucleotide gene array data is identifying differentially expressed genes. A challenge to biostatisticians is to develop an approach to summarizing probe-level information that adequately reflects the true expression level while accounting for probe variation, chip variation and interaction effects. Various statistical tools, such as MAS and RMA, have been developed to address this issue. In these approaches, the probe level expression data are summarized into gene level data, which are then used for downstream statistical analysis. Since probe variation is often larger than chip variation and there is also a potential interaction effect between probe affinity and treatment effect, strategies such as a gene level analysis, may not be optimal. In this study, we propose a procedure to analyze probe level data for selecting differentially expressed genes under two treatment conditions (groups) with a small number of replicates. The probe level discrepancy between two groups can be measured by a difference of the percentiles of probe perfect-match (PM) ranks or of probe PM weighted ranks. The difference is then compared with a pre-specified threshold to determine differentially expressed genes. The probe level approach takes into account non-homogenous treatment effects and reduces possible cross-hybridization effects across a set of probes. RESULTS: The proposed approach is compared with MAS and RMA using two benchmark gene array datasets. Positive predictivity and sensitivity are used for evaluation. Results show the proposed approach has higher positive predictivity and higher sensitivity. AVAILABILITY: Available on request from the authors. CONTACT: [email protected].
Dung-Tsa Chen, James J. Chen, Seng-jaw Soong
Bioinform.1
2005 Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarray experiments often involve hundreds or thousands of genes. In a typical experiment, only a fraction of genes are expected to be differentially expressed; in addition, the measured intensities among different genes may be correlated. Depending on the experimental objectives, sample size calculations can be based on one of the three specified measures: sensitivity, true discovery and accuracy rates. The sample size problem is formulated as: the number of arrays needed in order to achieve the desired fraction of the specified measure at the desired family-wise power at the given type I error and (standardized) effect size. RESULTS: We present a general approach for estimating sample size under independent and equally correlated models using binomial and beta-binomial models, respectively. The sample sizes needed for a two-sample z-test are computed; the computed theoretical numbers agree well with the Monte Carlo simulation results. But, under more general correlation structures, the beta-binomial model can underestimate the needed samples by about 1-5 arrays. CONTACT: [email protected].
Chen-An Tsai, Sue-Jane Wang, Dung-Tsa Chen, James J. Chen
Bioinform.3
2004 Gene selection for oligonucleotide array: an approach using PM probe level data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Analysis of oligonucleotide array data, especially to select genes of interest, is a highly challenging task because of the large volume of information and various experimental factors. Moreover, interaction effect (i.e. expression changes depend on probe effects) complicates the analysis because current methods often use an additive model to analyze data. We propose an approach to address these issues with the aim of producing a more reliable selection of differentially expressed genes. The approach uses the rank for normalization, employs the percentile-range to measure expression variation, and applies various filters to monitor expression changes. RESULTS: We compare our approach with MAS and Dchip models. A data set from an angiogenesis study is used for illustration. Results show that our approach performs better than other methods either in identification of the positive control gene or in PCR confirmatory tests. In addition, the invariant set of genes in our approach provides an efficient way for normalization.
Dung-Tsa Chen, Sue-Hwa Lin, Seng-jaw Soong
Bioinform.1
1998 A Stochastic Model for Scheduling Programs to Maximize Outcome
abstract
This paper investigates the relationship of hospital profits from CT scanning and its schedule administration for scheduled patients. A stochastic model is constructed to describe the dynamics of patient arrival and the scanner's service. Hospital profits are calculated from the service charges, subtracting the possible loss due to withdrawal of discouraged patients. Hospital expenses for hardware and personnel are fixed, and hence are not taken into consideration.
Yao-Yang Shieh, Glenn H. Roberson, Wenyaw Chan, Dung-Tsa Chen
CBMS4