Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew F. Siegel
dblp:76/2698
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0002-2144-2591ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › subnetwork detection
active subnetwork detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks · ISMB 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
molecular network analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks · ISMB 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
gene expression data integration |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks · ISMB 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulated annealing · 0.0monte carlo method · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A Third Approach to Gene Prediction Suggests Thousands of Additional Human Transcribed RegionsabstractThe identification and characterization of the complete ensemble of genes is a main goal of deciphering the digital information stored in the human genome. Many algorithms for computational gene prediction have been described, ultimately derived from two basic concepts: (1) modeling gene structure and (2) recognizing sequence similarity. Successful hybrid methods combining these two concepts have also been developed. We present a third orthogonal approach to gene prediction, based on detecting the genomic signatures of transcription, accumulated over evolutionary time. We discuss four algorithms based on this third concept: Greens and CHOWDER, which quantify mutational strand biases caused by transcription-coupled DNA repair, and ROAST and PASTA, which are based on strand-specific selection against polyadenylation signals. We combined these algorithms into an integrated method called FEAST, which we used to predict the location and orientation of thousands of putative transcription units not overlapping known genes. Many of the newly predicted transcriptional units do not appear to code for proteins. The new algorithms are particularly apt at detecting genes with long introns and lacking sequence conservation. They therefore complement existing gene prediction methods and will help identify functional transcripts within many apparent "genomic deserts." Gwênlyn Glusman, Shizhen Qin, M. Raafat El-Gewely, Andrew F. Siegel, Jared C. Roach, Leroy E. Hood, Arian F. A. Smit |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2002 | Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networksabstractAbstract Motivation: In model organisms such as yeast, large databases of protein–protein and protein-DNA interactions have become an extremely important resource for the study of protein function, evolution, and gene regulatory dynamics. In this paper we demonstrate that by integrating these interactions with widely-available mRNA expression data, it is possible to generate concrete hypotheses for the underlying mechanisms governing the observed changes in gene expression. To perform this integration systematically and at large scale, we introduce an approach for screening a molecular interaction network to identify active subnetworks, i.e., connected regions of the network that show significant changes in expression over particular subsets of conditions. The method we present here combines a rigorous statistical measure for scoring subnetworks with a search algorithm for identifying subnetworks with high score. Results: We evaluated our procedure on a small network of 332 genes and 362 interactions and a large network of 4160 genes containing all 7462 protein–protein and protein-DNA interactions in the yeast public databases. In the case of the small network, we identified five significant subnetworks that covered 41 out of 77 (53%) of all significant changes in expression. Both network analyses returned several top-scoring subnetworks with good correspondence to known regulatory mechanisms in the literature. These results demonstrate how large-scale genomic approaches may be used to uncover signalling and regulatory pathways in a systematic, integrative fashion. Availability: The methods presented in this paper are implemented in the Cytoscape software package which is available to the academic community at http://www.cytoscape.org. Contact: [email protected] Keywords: molecular interactions; gene expression; data integration; simulated annealing; Monte carlo methods. *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Trey Ideker, Owen Ozier, Benno Schwikowski, Andrew F. Siegel |
ISMB | 4 |