Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adi Robertson

dblp:76/9306 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal communication
self-disclosure
0.112011
A tale of two languages: strategic self-disclosure via language selection on facebook · CSCW 2011
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social network sites
0.112011
A tale of two languages: strategic self-disclosure via language selection on facebook · CSCW 2011
Usable security
privacy control
0.012011
A tale of two languages: strategic self-disclosure via language selection on facebook · CSCW 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantitative analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A tale of two languages: strategic self-disclosure via language selection on facebook
abstract
In this paper, we analyze the way in which international Facebook users who had recently moved to the United States used different languages to selectively self-disclose to their old (native-language) and new (English-speaking) social circles. We found significantly more intimate self-disclosure, covering a broader range of cognitive and emotional topics, in native-language status updates compared to updates in English. Self-disclosure was also more positive in English. These patterns support our hypotheses that users exploit language barriers to serve different self-presentational goals for different social circles and generate implications for SNS privacy control.
Dai Tang, Tina Chou, Naomi Drucker, Adi Robertson, William C. Smith, Jeffrey T. Hancock
CSCW4