Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Takahisa Toda
dblp:76/9729
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9004-6146ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Approximation-guided Fairness Testing through Discriminatory Space Analysis · ASE 2024 Toward Individual Fairness Testing with Data Validity · ASE 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › individual fairness
individual fairness testing |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Approximation-guided Fairness Testing through Discriminatory Space Analysis · ASE 2024 Toward Individual Fairness Testing with Data Validity · ASE 2024 |
Software testing › machine learning testing
fairness testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Approximation-guided Fairness Testing through Discriminatory Space Analysis · ASE 2024 |
Software testing
machine learning testing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Toward Individual Fairness Testing with Data Validity · ASE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
path sampling · 1.5fairness testing · 1.5decision tree approximation · 1.5data validity analysis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Toward Individual Fairness Testing with Data ValidityabstractIndividual fairness testing (Ift) is a framework to find discriminatory instances within a given classifier. In this paper, we show our idea of a Ift framework, that integrates the notion of data validity, termed "Individual Fairness Testing with Data Validity (Ift-v)". We develop a solid foundation of Ift-v and demonstrate the feasibility of Ift-v. Our preliminary evaluation with Ift-v reveals the possibility that many of discriminatory instances detected by state-of-the-art Ift algorithms are considered invalid. These findings prompt a re-think of the current Ift framework, suggesting a transition from solely focusing on the discovery of discriminatory instances to the consideration of valid ones. Takashi Kitamura 0001, Sousuke Amasaki, Jun Inoue 0001, Yoshinao Isobe, Takahisa Toda |
ASE | 5 |
| 2024 | Approximation-guided Fairness Testing through Discriminatory Space AnalysisabstractAs machine learning (ML) systems are increasingly used in various fields, including tasks with high social impact, concerns about their fairness are growing. To address these concerns, individual fairness testing (IFT) has been introduced to identify individual discriminatory instances (IDIs) that indicate the violation of individual fairness in a given ML classifier. In this paper, we propose a black-box testing algorithm for IFT, named Aft (short for Approximation-guided Fairness Testing). Aft constructs approximate models based on decision trees, and generates test cases by sampling paths of the decision trees. Our evaluation by experiments confirms that Aft outperforms the state-of-the-art black-box IFT algorithm ExpGA both in efficiency (by 3.42 times) and diversity of IDIs identified by algorithms (by 1.16 times). Zhenjiang Zhao 0002, Takahisa Toda, Takashi Kitamura 0001 |
ASE | 2 |
| 2024 | Diversity-aware fairness testing of machine learning classifiers through hashing-based sampling
Zhenjiang Zhao 0002, Takahisa Toda, Takashi Kitamura 0001 |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 2 |
| 2023 | ZDD-Based Algorithmic Framework for Solving Shortest Reconfiguration Problems
Takehiro Ito, Jun Kawahara, Yu Nakahata, Takehide Soh, Akira Suzuki 0001, Junichi Teruyama, Takahisa Toda |
CPAIOR | 7 |
| 2023 | Solving Reconfiguration Problems of First-Order Expressible Properties of Graph Vertices with Boolean SatisfiabilityabstractThis paper presents a unified framework for capturing a variety of graph reconfiguration problems in terms of firstorder expressible properties and proposes a Boolean encoding for formulas in the first-order logic of graphs based on the exploitation of fundamental properties of graphs. We show that a variety of graph reconfiguration problems captured in our framework can be computed in a unified way by combining our encoding and Boolean satisfiability solver in a bounded model checking approach but allowing us to use quantifiers and predicates on vertices to express reconfiguration properties. Takahisa Toda, Takehiro Ito, Jun Kawahara, Takehide Soh, Akira Suzuki 0001, Junichi Teruyama |
ICTAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Applying Combinatorial Testing to Verification-Based Fairness Testing
Takashi Kitamura 0001, Zhenjiang Zhao 0002, Takahisa Toda |
SSBSE | 3 |
| 2022 | Efficient Fairness Testing Through Hash-Based Sampling
Zhenjiang Zhao 0002, Takahisa Toda, Takashi Kitamura 0001 |
SSBSE | 2 |
| 2018 | Extended Min-Hash Focusing on Intersection Cardinality
Hisashi Koga, Taiki Itabashi, Gibran Fuentes-Pineda, Takahisa Toda |
IDEAL (1) | 5 |
| 2016 | Effective construction of compression-based feature space
Hisashi Koga, Yuji Nakajima, Takahisa Toda |
ISITA | 3 |
| 2013 | Fast Compression of Large-Scale Hypergraphs for Solving Combinatorial Problems
Takahisa Toda |
Discovery Science | 1 |
| 2013 | Hypergraph Transversal Computation with Binary Decision Diagrams
Takahisa Toda |
SEA | 1 |