Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yutaka Nakagawa

dblp:77/1616 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 56% Empirical software engineering · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.011989
An Error Complexity Model for Software Reliability Measurement · ICSE 1989
Software testing
software reliability
0.011989
An Error Complexity Model for Software Reliability Measurement · ICSE 1989
Software testing › software reliability
reliability assessment
0.011989
An Error Complexity Model for Software Reliability Measurement · ICSE 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical evaluation · 0.0error complexity modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 An Error Complexity Model for Software Reliability Measurement
abstract
Many simple software errors are found in earlier software test phases.The ratio of complex errors to simple errors gradually increases with continual testing.This paper describes a software reliability model called the Error Complexity Model.In this model, errors are classified by error complexity which is a measure of error detectability.The number of remaining software errors is estimated from the ratio of complex to simple errors and the number of discovered errors.New criteria for error complexity classification are proposed.The model is evaluated and compared with existing models using actual error data.
Yutaka Nakagawa, Shuetsu Hanata
ICSE1