Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kun Qian 0016
dblp:77/2062-16
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8255-2527ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 45% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 13% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Learning and educational technologies · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
2.0 | 4 | 2023 | KRLS: Improving End-to-End Response Generation in Task Oriented Dialog with Reinforced Keywords Learning · EMNLP 2023 A Student-Teacher Architecture for Dialog Domain Adaptation Under the Meta-Learning Setting · AAAI 2021 End-to-End Trainable Non-Collaborative Dialog System · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
dialogue response generation |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | KRLS: Improving End-to-End Response Generation in Task Oriented Dialog with Reinforced Keywords Learning · EMNLP 2023 End-to-End Trainable Non-Collaborative Dialog System · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | A Student-Teacher Architecture for Dialog Domain Adaptation Under the Meta-Learning Setting · AAAI 2021 Domain Adaptive Dialog Generation via Meta Learning · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
data provenance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bridging the Data Provenance Gap Across Text, Speech, and Video · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
dataset auditing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bridging the Data Provenance Gap Across Text, Speech, and Video · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse coherence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DECOR: Improving Coherence in L2 English Writing with a Novel Benchmark for Incoherence Detection, Reasoning, and Rewriting · EMNLP 2024 |
Learning and educational technologies › writing support
automated writing evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DECOR: Improving Coherence in L2 English Writing with a Novel Benchmark for Incoherence Detection, Reasoning, and Rewriting · EMNLP 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance
consent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | KRLS: Improving End-to-End Response Generation in Task Oriented Dialog with Reinforced Keywords Learning · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue
non-collaborative dialogue |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | End-to-End Trainable Non-Collaborative Dialog System · AAAI 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Domain Adaptive Dialog Generation via Meta Learning · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Domain Adaptive Dialog Generation via Meta Learning · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
user simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | How to Build User Simulators to Train RL-based Dialog Systems · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
longitudinal audit · 2.4robots.txt analysis · 1.5incoherence reasoning · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5manual analysis · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.7next-word sampling · 0.7keyword reward · 0.7meta-learning · 0.5adversarial training · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bridging the Data Provenance Gap Across Text, Speech, and VideoabstractProgress in AI is driven largely by the scale and quality of training data. Despite this, there is a deficit of empirical analysis examining the attributes of well-established datasets beyond text. In this work we conduct the largest and first-of-its-kind longitudinal audit across modalities --- popular text, speech, and video datasets --- from their detailed sourcing trends and use restrictions to their geographical and linguistic representation. Our manual analysis covers nearly 4000 public datasets between 1990-2024, spanning 608 languages, 798 sources, 659 organizations, and 67 countries. We find that multimodal machine learning applications have overwhelmingly turned to web-crawled, synthetic, and social media platforms, such as YouTube, for their training sets, eclipsing all other sources since 2019. Secondly, tracing the chain of dataset derivations we find that while less than 33% of datasets are restrictively licensed, over 80% of the source content in widely-used text, speech, and video datasets, carry non-commercial restrictions. Finally, counter to the rising number of languages and geographies represented in public AI training datasets, our audit demonstrates measures of relative geographical and multilingual representation have failed to significantly improve their coverage since 2013. We believe the breadth of our audit enables us to empirically examine trends in data sourcing, restrictions, and Western-centricity at an ecosystem-level, and that visibility into these questions are essential to progress in responsible AI. As a contribution to ongoing improvements in dataset transparency and responsible use, we release our entire multimodal audit, allowing practitioners to trace data provenance across text, speech, and video. Shayne Longpre, Nikhil Singh 0003, Manuel Cherep, Kushagra Tiwary, Joanna Materzynska, William Brannon, Robert Mahari, Naana Obeng-Marnu, Manan Dey, Mohammed Hamdy, Nayan Saxena, Ahmad Mustafa Anis, Emad A. Alghamdi, Vu Minh Chien, Da Yin, Kun Qian 0016, Minnie Liang, An Dinh, Shrestha Mohanty |
ICLR | 16 |
| 2024 | DECOR: Improving Coherence in L2 English Writing with a Novel Benchmark for Incoherence Detection, Reasoning, and RewritingabstractCoherence in writing, an aspect that secondlanguage (L2) English learners often struggle with, is crucial in assessing L2 English writing.Existing automated writing evaluation systems primarily use basic surface linguistic features to detect coherence in writing.However, little effort has been made to correct the detected incoherence, which could significantly benefit L2 language learners seeking to improve their writing.To bridge this gap, we introduce DECOR, a novel benchmark that includes expert annotations for detecting incoherence in L2 English writing, identifying the underlying reasons, and rewriting the incoherent sentences.To our knowledge, DECOR is the first coherence assessment dataset specifically designed for improving L2 English writing, featuring pairs of original incoherent sentences alongside their expert-rewritten counterparts.Additionally, we fine-tuned models to automatically detect and rewrite incoherence in student essays.We find that incorporating specific reasons for incoherence during fine-tuning consistently improves the quality of the rewrites, achieving a result that is favored in both automatic and human evaluations.1 Xuanming Zhang, Anthony Diaz, Zixun Chen, Qingyang Wu, Kun Qian 0016, Erik Voss, Zhou Yu 0005 |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2024 | Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data CommonsabstractGeneral-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems are built on massive swathes of public web data, assembled into corpora such as C4, RefinedWeb, and Dolma. To our knowledge, we conduct the first, large-scale, longitudinal audit of the consent protocols for the web domains underlying AI training corpora. Our audit of 14,000 web domains provides an expansive view of crawlable web data and how codified data use preferences are changing over time. We observe a proliferation of AI-specific clauses to limit use, acute differences in restrictions on AI developers, as well as general inconsistencies between websites' expressed intentions in their Terms of Service and their robots.txt. We diagnose these as symptoms of ineffective web protocols, not designed to cope with the widespread re-purposing of the internet for AI. Our longitudinal analyses show that in a single year (2023-2024) there has been a rapid crescendo of data restrictions from web sources, rendering ~5\%+ of all tokens in C4, or 28%+ of the most actively maintained, critical sources in C4, fully restricted from use. For Terms of Service crawling restrictions, a full 45% of C4 is now restricted. If respected or enforced, these restrictions are rapidly biasing the diversity, freshness, and scaling laws for general-purpose AI systems. We hope to illustrate the emerging crises in data consent, for both developers and creators. The foreclosure of much of the open web will impact not only commercial AI, but also non-commercial AI and academic research. Shayne Longpre, Robert Mahari, Ariel Lee, Campbell Lund, Hamidah Oderinwale, William Brannon, Nayan Saxena, Naana Obeng-Marnu, Tobin South, Cole Hunter, Kevin Klyman, Christopher Klamm, Hailey Schoelkopf, Nikhil Singh 0003, Manuel Cherep, Ahmad Anis, An Dinh, Caroline Shamiso Chitongo, Da Yin, Damien Sileo, Deividas Mataciunas, Diganta Misra, Emad A. Alghamdi, Enrico Shippole, Jianguo Zhang 0005, Joanna Materzynska, Kun Qian 0016, Kushagra Tiwary, Lester James V. Miranda, Manan Dey, Minnie Liang, Mohammed Hamdy, Niklas Muennighoff, Seonghyeon Ye, Seungone Kim, Shrestha Mohanty, Vivek Sharma 0001, Minh Chien Vu, Caiming Xiong, Stella Biderman, Daphne Ippolito, Sara Hooker, Jad Kabbara, Alex Pentland |
NeurIPS | 27 |
| 2023 | KRLS: Improving End-to-End Response Generation in Task Oriented Dialog with Reinforced Keywords LearningabstractIn task-oriented dialogs (TOD), reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms train a model to directly optimize response for task-related metrics.However, RL needs to perform exploration, which can be time-consuming due to the slow auto-regressive sequence generation process.We investigate an approach to create a more efficient RL-based algorithm to improve TOD performance in an offline setting.First, we use a faster generation procedure that samples from independent next-word distributions after training the language model (LM) with supervised learning.We then introduce a finegrained reward function to help the model focus on learning key information in a dialog, by measuring the importance and semantic closeness of each generated token.Experiments on the MultiWoZ dataset show our new training algorithm, Keywords Reinforcement Learning with Next-word Sampling (KRLS), achieves state-of-the-art performance on the end-to-end response generation task, with a 15% training time reduction compared to a standard RL algorithm using auto-regressive generation 1 . Xiao Yu 0011, Qingyang Wu, Kun Qian 0016, Zhou Yu 0005 |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2023 | Enhancing Performance on Seen and Unseen Dialogue Scenarios using Retrieval-Augmented End-to-End Task-Oriented SystemabstractJianguo Zhang, Stephen Roller, Kun Qian, Zhiwei Liu, Rui Meng, Shelby Heinecke, Huan Wang, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong. Proceedings of the 24th Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 2023. Jianguo Zhang 0005, Stephen Roller, Kun Qian 0016, Zhiwei Liu 0001, Shelby Heinecke, Huan Wang 0016, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong |
SIGDIAL | 3 |
| 2022 | Database Search Results Disambiguation for Task-Oriented Dialog SystemsabstractKun Qian, Satwik Kottur, Ahmad Beirami, Shahin Shayandeh, Paul Crook, Alborz Geramifard, Zhou Yu, Chinnadhurai Sankar. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Kun Qian 0016, Satwik Kottur, Ahmad Beirami, Shahin Shayandeh, Paul A. Crook, Alborz Geramifard, Zhou Yu 0005, Chinnadhurai Sankar |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2021 | A Student-Teacher Architecture for Dialog Domain Adaptation Under the Meta-Learning SettingabstractNumerous new dialog domains are being created every day while collecting data for these domains is extremely costly since it involves human interactions. Therefore, it is essential to develop algorithms that can adapt to different domains efficiently when building data-driven dialog models. Most recent research on domain adaption focuses on giving the model a better initialization, rather than optimizing the adaptation process. We propose an efficient domain adaptive task-oriented dialog system model, which incorporates a meta-teacher model to emphasize the different impacts between generated tokens with respect to the context. We first train our base dialog model and meta-teacher model adversarially in a meta-learning setting on rich-resource domains. The meta-teacher learns to quantify the importance of tokens under different contexts across different domains. During adaptation, the meta-teacher guides the dialog model to focus on important tokens in order to achieve better adaptation efficiency. We evaluate our model on two multi-domain datasets, MultiWOZ and Google Schema-Guided Dialogue, and achieve state-of-the-art performance. Kun Qian 0016, Zhou Yu 0005 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Annotation Inconsistency and Entity Bias in MultiWOZabstractMultiWOZ (Budzianowski et al., 2018) is one of the most popular multi-domain taskoriented dialog datasets, containing 10K+ annotated dialogs covering eight domains.It has been widely accepted as a benchmark for various dialog tasks, e.g., dialog state tracking (DST), natural language generation (NLG) and end-to-end (E2E) dialog modeling.In this work, we identify an overlooked issue with dialog state annotation inconsistencies in the dataset, where a slot type is tagged inconsistently across similar dialogs leading to confusion for DST modeling.We propose an automated correction for this issue, which is present in 70% of the dialogs.Additionally, we notice that there is significant entity bias in the dataset (e.g., "cambridge" appears in 50% of the destination cities in the train domain).The entity bias can potentially lead to named entity memorization in generative models, which may go unnoticed as the test set suffers from a similar entity bias as well.We release a new test set with all entities replaced with unseen entities.Finally, we benchmark joint goal accuracy (JGA) of the state-of-theart DST baselines on these modified versions of the data.Our experiments show that the annotation inconsistency corrections lead to 7-10% improvement in JGA.On the other hand, we observe a 29% drop in JGA when models are evaluated on the new test set with unseen entities.* The work of KQ and ZY was done as a research intern and a visiting research scientist at Facebook AI. Kun Qian 0016, Ahmad Beirami, Zhouhan Lin, Ankita De, Alborz Geramifard, Zhou Yu 0005, Chinnadhurai Sankar |
SIGDIAL | 1 |
| 2020 | End-to-End Trainable Non-Collaborative Dialog SystemabstractEnd-to-end task-oriented dialog models have achieved promising performance on collaborative tasks where users willingly coordinate with the system to complete a given task. While in non-collaborative settings, for example, negotiation and persuasion, users and systems do not share a common goal. As a result, compared to collaborate tasks, people use social content to build rapport and trust in these non-collaborative settings in order to advance their goals. To handle social content, we introduce a hierarchical intent annotation scheme, which can be generalized to different non-collaborative dialog tasks. Building upon TransferTransfo (Wolf et al. 2019), we propose an end-to-end neural network model to generate diverse coherent responses. Our model utilizes intent and semantic slots as the intermediate sentence representation to guide the generation process. In addition, we design a filter to select appropriate responses based on whether these intermediate representations fit the designed task and conversation constraints. Our non-collaborative dialog model guides users to complete the task while simultaneously keeps them engaged. We test our approach on our newly proposed AntiScam dataset and an existing PersuasionForGood dataset. Both automatic and human evaluations suggest that our model outperforms multiple baselines in these two non-collaborative tasks. Yu Li 0013, Kun Qian 0016, Weiyan Shi 0001, Zhou Yu 0005 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Domain Adaptive Dialog Generation via Meta LearningabstractDomain adaptation is an essential task in dialog system building because there are so many new dialog tasks created for different needs every day.Collecting and annotating training data for these new tasks is costly since it involves real user interactions.We propose a domain adaptive dialog generation method based on meta-learning (DAML).DAML is an end-to-end trainable dialog system model that learns from multiple rich-resource tasks and then adapts to new domains with minimal training samples.We train a dialog system model using multiple rich-resource singledomain dialog data by applying the modelagnostic meta-learning algorithm to dialog domain.The model is capable of learning a competitive dialog system on a new domain with only a few training examples in an efficient manner.The two-step gradient updates in DAML enable the model to learn general features across multiple tasks.We evaluate our method on a simulated dialog dataset and achieve state-of-the-art performance, which is generalizable to new tasks. Kun Qian 0016, Zhou Yu 0005 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | How to Build User Simulators to Train RL-based Dialog SystemsabstractWeiyan Shi, Kun Qian, Xuewei Wang, Zhou Yu. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Weiyan Shi 0001, Kun Qian 0016, Zhou Yu 0005 |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |