Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan F. Veneman

dblp:77/4563 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0002-6408-6558ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot manipulation · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
exoskeleton control
0.112007
LOPES: a lower extremity powered exoskeleton · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Robot manipulation › wearable robotics › exoskeleton
lower-limb exoskeleton
0.112007
LOPES: a lower extremity powered exoskeleton · ICRA 2007
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology › rehabilitation robotics
gait rehabilitation
0.112007
LOPES: a lower extremity powered exoskeleton · ICRA 2007
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
rehabilitation robotics
0.112007
LOPES: a lower extremity powered exoskeleton · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

powered exoskeleton · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 LOPES: a lower extremity powered exoskeleton
abstract
Due to aging of the population, growing numbers of people are affected by impairments of their motor system, caused by disorders like stroke. Treatment of stroke patients is very intensive in the amount of training per patient per day. The treatment duration per patient combined with the total number of people suffering from a stroke makes rehabilitation therapy extremely costly. This makes devices that could reduce the costs of therapy attractive to rehabilitation centres. Currently there are robotic rehabilitation devices under development for both the upper and lower extremities. Our group focuses mainly on the recovery of gait after stroke. The LOPES robot is designed for use in training on a treadmill to accommodate for limited space of rehabilitation centres and easy access for the therapist to the patient. As a 'robotic therapist' it is meant to make rehabilitation more effective for patients and less demanding for therapists.
Ralf Ekkelenkamp, Jan F. Veneman, Herman van der Kooij
ICRA2