Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roman Sásik

dblp:78/1381 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-9266-8993ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
gene interaction network
0.412019
On entropy and information in gene interaction networks · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
gene set enrichment analysis
0.412019
On entropy and information in gene interaction networks · Bioinform. 2019
Information theory › information measures › shannon information measures
entropy and mutual information
0.112019
On entropy and information in gene interaction networks · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.022002
Extracting transcriptional events from temporal gene expression patterns during Dictyostelium development · Bioinform. 2002
Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays: a multiplicative noise model · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012002
Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays: a multiplicative noise model · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
temporal gene expression analysis
0.012002
Extracting transcriptional events from temporal gene expression patterns during Dictyostelium development · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
developmental biology
0.012002
Extracting transcriptional events from temporal gene expression patterns during Dictyostelium development · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing › probe-level analysis
probe signal normalization
0.012002
Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays: a multiplicative noise model · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutual information · 0.8interaction information · 0.8harmonic oscillator model · 0.8entropy · 0.8statistical modeling · 0.0outlier elimination · 0.0kinetic model of gene expression · 0.0clustering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 On entropy and information in gene interaction networks
abstract
MOTIVATION: Modern biological experiments often produce candidate lists of genes presumably related to the studied phenotype. One can ask if the gene list as a whole makes sense in the context of existing knowledge: Are the genes in the list reasonably related to each other or do they look like a random assembly? There are also situations when one wants to know if two or more gene sets are closely related. Gene enrichment tests based on counting the number of genes two sets have in common are adequate if we presume that two genes are related only when they are in fact identical. If by related we mean well connected in the interaction network space, we need a new measure of relatedness for gene sets. RESULTS: We derive entropy, interaction information and mutual information for gene sets on interaction networks, starting from a simple phenomenological model of a living cell. Formally, the model describes a set of interacting linear harmonic oscillators in thermal equilibrium. Because the energy function is a quadratic form of the degrees of freedom, entropy and all other derived information quantities can be calculated exactly. We apply these concepts to estimate the probability that genes from several independent genome-wide association studies are not mutually informative; to estimate the probability that two disjoint canonical metabolic pathways are not mutually informative; and to infer relationships among human diseases based on their gene signatures. We show that the present approach is able to predict observationally validated relationships not detectable by gene enrichment methods. The converse is also true; the two methods are therefore complementary. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The functions defined in this paper are available in an R package, gsia, available for download at https://github.com/ucsd-ccbb/gsia.
Z. S. Wallace, Sara Brin Rosenthal, Kathleen M. Fisch, Trey Ideker, Roman Sásik
Bioinform.5
2002 Statistical analysis of high-density oligonucleotide arrays: a multiplicative noise model
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-density oligonucleotide arrays (GeneChip, Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) have become a standard research tool in many areas of biomedical research. They quantitatively monitor the expression of thousands of genes simultaneously by measuring fluorescence from gene-specific targets or probes. The relationship between signal intensities and transcript abundance as well as normalization issues have been the focus of much recent attention (Hill et al., 2001; Chudin et al., 2002; Naef et al., 2002a). It is desirable that a researcher has the best possible analytical tools to make the most of the information that this powerful technology has to offer. At present there are three analytical methods available: the newly released Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0 (AMS) software that accompanies the GeneChip product, the method of Li and Wong (LW; Li and Wong, 2001), and the method of Naef et al. (FN; Naef et al., 2001). The AMS method is tailored for analysis of a single microarray, and can therefore be used with any experimental design. The LW method on the other hand depends on a large number of microarrays in an experiment and cannot be used for an isolated microarray, and the FN method is particular to paired microarrays, such as resulting from an experiment in which each 'treatment' sample has a corresponding 'control' sample. Our focus is on analysis of experiments in which there is a series of samples. In this case only the AMS, LW, and the method described in this paper can be used. The present method is model-based, like the LW method, but assumes multiplicative not additive noise, and employs elimination of statistically significant outliers for improved results. Unlike LW and AMS, we do not assume probe-specific background (measured by the so-called mismatch probes). Rather, we assume uniform background, whose level is estimated using both the mismatch and perfect match probe intensities. RESULTS: We present a new method for GeneChip analysis, based on a statistical model with multiplicative noise. We demonstrated that this method yields results superior to those obtained by the Affymetrix Microarray Suite 5.0 software and to those obtained by the model-based method of Li and Wong (Li and Wong, 2001). The present method eliminates the hard-to-interpret negative expression indices, and the binary 'presence' calls (present or absent) are replaced by the statistical significance (p-value) of gene expression. We have found that thresholding the p-values at the (0.1)(16)-level produces about the same number of 'present' calls as the AMS software. By testing our method on a pair of replicate GeneChips (hybridized with the same cRNA), we found that 95.6% of data points lie within the 1.25-fold interval. In other words, our method had a 4.4% type I error rate at the 1.25-fold level. The error rate of the LW method was 15%, and that of the AMS method was 29%. There were no points outside the 2-fold interval with the present method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of another experiment with multiple replicates shows that this reduction of variance is not accompanied by a corresponding reduction of signal. On the contrary, the signal-to-noise ratio (as measured by the distribution of F-statistics) of the present method is on average 3.4-times better than that of AMS, and 1.4-times better than that of Li and Wong.
Roman Sásik, Ézéquiel Calvo, Jacques Corbeil
Bioinform.1
2002 Extracting transcriptional events from temporal gene expression patterns during Dictyostelium development
abstract
MOTIVATION: The DNA microarray technology can generate a large amount of data describing the time-course of gene expression. These data, when properly interpreted, can yield a great deal of information concerning differential gene expression during development. Much current effort in bioinformatics has been devoted to the analysis of gene expression data, usually via some 'clustering analysis' on the raw data in some abstract high dimensional space. Here, we describe a method where we first 'process' the raw time-course data using a simple biologically based kinetic model of gene expression. This allows us to reduce the vast data to a few vital attributes characterizing each expression profile, e.g. the times of the onset and cessation of the expression of the developmentally regulated genes. These vital attributes can then be trivially clustered by visual inspection to reveal biologically significant effects. RESULTS: We have applied this approach to microarray expression data from samples isolated every 2 h throughout the 24 h developmental program of Dictyostelium discoideum. mRNA accumulation patterns for 50 developmental genes were found to fit the kinetic model with a p-value of 0.05 or better. Transcription of these genes appears to be initiated in bursts at well-defined periods during development, in a manner suggestive of a dependent sequence. This approach can be applied to analyses of other temporal gene expression patterns, including those of the cell cycle.
Roman Sásik, N. Iranfar, Terence Hwa, W. F. Loomis
Bioinform.1