Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaeyong Song 0001
dblp:78/8128-1
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-0712-2425ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 65% Health and well-being technologies · 35% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › adaptive robot behavior
adaptive assistance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Polymorphic Control Framework for Automated and Individualized Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation technology
rehabilitation robotics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Polymorphic Control Framework for Automated and Individualized Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Human-Robot Attachment System for Exoskeletons: Design and Performance Analysis · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping, dexterous and mobile manipulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Human-Robot Attachment System for Exoskeletons: Design and Performance Analysis · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › wearable robotics › exoskeleton
upper-limb exoskeleton |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Human-Robot Attachment System for Exoskeletons: Design and Performance Analysis · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
force control · 1.3case study · 1.3modular control architecture · 0.8invariant state design · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Polymorphic Control Framework for Automated and Individualized Robot-Assisted RehabilitationabstractRobots were introduced in the field of upper limb neurorehabilitation to relieve the therapist from physical labor, and to provide high-intensity therapy to the patient. A variety of control methods were developed that incorporate patients' physiological and biomechanical states to adapt the provided assistance automatically. Higher level states, such as selected type of assistance, chosen task characteristics, defined session goals, and given patient impairments, are often neglected or modeled into tight requirements, low-dimensional study designs, and narrow inclusion criteria so that presented solutions cannot be transferred to other tasks, robotic devices or target groups. In this work, we present the design of a modular high-level control framework based on invariant states covering all decision layers in therapy. We verified the functionality of our framework on the assistance and task layer by outlaying the invariant states based on the characteristics of 20 examined state-of-the-art controllers. Then, we integrated four controllers on each layer and designed two algorithms that automatically selected suitable controllers. The framework was deployed on an arm rehabilitation robot and tested on one participant acting as a patient. We observed plausible system reactions to external changes by a second operator representing a therapist. We believe that this work will boost the development of novel controllers and selection algorithms in cooperative decision-making on layers other than assistance, and eases transferability and integration of existing solutions on lower layers into arbitrary robotic systems. Michael Sommerhalder, Yves Zimmermann, Jaeyong Song 0001, Robert Riener, Peter Wolf 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |
| 2023 | Human-Robot Attachment System for Exoskeletons: Design and Performance AnalysisabstractExoskeleton robots found application in neurorehabilitation, telemanipulation, and power augmentation. The human–robot attachment system of an exoskeleton should transmit all the interaction forces while keeping the anatomical and robotic joint axes aligned. Existing attachment concepts were bounding the performance of modern exoskeletons due to insufficient stiffness for high-performance force control, time-consuming adaption processes, and/or bulkiness. Therefore, we developed an augmented attachment system for a recent fully actuated nine-degree-of-freedom upper limb exoskeleton. The proposed system was compared to a conventional solution in a case study with four participants. The proposed attachment system lowered the relative motion between the human and the robot under static loads for all defined landmarks by 45% on average. The occurrence of undesired contacts in the trials was mitigated by 74%, thus improving conditions for closed-loop force control. Furthermore, the proposed system adapted better to the user's anatomy facilitating more accurate alignment and less obstruction. On average, self-attachment took$\mathbf {43(8.3)}$$\mathrm{s}$to don(doff). Thereby, the alignment of anatomic landmarks had typically less than 15 mm offset to a thorough expert alignment, making self-attachment eligible. The augmented attachment system and the insights gained by the case study are expected to enable improvement of the physical human–robot interaction of exoskeletons. Yves Zimmermann, Jaeyong Song 0001, Cédric Deguelle, Julia Läderach, Lingfei Zhou, Marco Hutter 0001, Robert Riener, Peter Wolf 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 2 |