Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zi Wang 0004
dblp:78/8711-4
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Reinforcement learning · 23% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 3 | 2018 | Regret bounds for meta Bayesian optimization with an unknown Gaussian process prior · NeurIPS 2018 Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learning · ICML 2017 Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimization · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Learning sparse relational transition models · ICLR (Poster) 2019 Focused model-learning and planning for non-Gaussian continuous state-action systems · ICRA 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
relational reasoning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning sparse relational transition models · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Regret bounds for meta Bayesian optimization with an unknown Gaussian process prior · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
high-dimensional bayesian optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learning · ICML 2017 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
pushing manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Focused model-learning and planning for non-Gaussian continuous state-action systems · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret bound analysis · 0.6entropy search · 0.6sparse learning · 0.4relational representation · 0.4probability of improvement · 0.3empirical bayes · 0.3GP-UCB · 0.3structural kernel learning · 0.3gibbs sampling · 0.3determinantal point process · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Learning sparse relational transition models
Victoria Xia, Zi Wang 0004, Kelsey R. Allen, Tom Silver, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional SpacesabstractBayesian optimization (BO) has become an effective approach for black-box function optimization problems when function evaluations are expensive and the optimum can be achieved within a relatively small number of queries. However, many cases, such as the ones with high-dimensional inputs, may require a much larger number of observations for optimization. Despite an abundance of observations thanks to parallel experiments, current BO techniques have been limited to merely a few thousand observations. In this paper, we propose ensemble Bayesian optimization (EBO) to address three current challenges in BO simultaneously: (1) large-scale observations; (2) high dimensional input spaces; and (3) selections of batch queries that balance quality and diversity. The key idea of EBO is to operate on an ensemble of additive Gaussian process models, each of which possesses a randomized strategy to divide and conquer. We show unprecedented, previously impossible results of scaling up BO to tens of thousands of observations within minutes of computation. Zi Wang 0004, Clement Gehring, Pushmeet Kohli, Stefanie Jegelka |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | Active Model Learning and Diverse Action Sampling for Task and Motion PlanningabstractThe objective of this work is to augment the basic abilities of a robot by learning to use new sensorimotor primitives to enable the solution of complex long-horizon problems. Solving long-horizon problems in complex domains requires flexible generative planning that can combine primitive abilities in novel combinations to solve problems as they arise in the world. In order to plan to combine primitive actions, we must have models of the preconditions and effects of those actions: under what circumstances will executing this primitive achieve some particular effect in the world? We use, and develop novel improvements on, state-of-the-art methods for active learning and sampling. We use Gaussian process methods for learning the conditions of operator effectiveness from small numbers of expensive training examples collected by experimentation on a robot. We develop adaptive sampling methods for generating diverse elements of continuous sets (such as robot configurations and object poses) during planning for solving a new task, so that planning is as efficient as possible. We demonstrate these methods in an integrated system, combining newly learned models with an efficient continuous-space robot task and motion planner to learn to solve long horizon problems more efficiently than was previously possible. Zi Wang 0004, Caelan Reed Garrett, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez |
IROS | 1 |
| 2018 | Regret bounds for meta Bayesian optimization with an unknown Gaussian process priorabstractBayesian optimization usually assumes that a Bayesian prior is given. However, the strong theoretical guarantees in Bayesian optimization are often regrettably compromised in practice because of unknown parameters in the prior. In this paper, we adopt a variant of empirical Bayes and show that, by estimating the Gaussian process prior from offline data sampled from the same prior and constructing unbiased estimators of the posterior, variants of both GP-UCB and \emph{probability of improvement} achieve a near-zero regret bound, which decreases to a constant proportional to the observational noise as the number of offline data and the number of online evaluations increase. Empirically, we have verified our approach on challenging simulated robotic problems featuring task and motion planning. Zi Wang 0004, Leslie Pack Kaelbling |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian OptimizationabstractEntropy Search (ES) and Predictive Entropy Search (PES) are popular and empirically successful Bayesian Optimization techniques. Both rely on a compelling information-theoretic motivation, and maximize the information gained about the $\arg\max$ of the unknown function; yet, both are plagued by the expensive computation for estimating entropies. We propose a new criterion, Max-value Entropy Search (MES), that instead uses the information about the maximum function value. We show relations of MES to other Bayesian optimization methods, and establish a regret bound. We observe that MES maintains or improves the good empirical performance of ES/PES, while tremendously lightening the computational burden. In particular, MES is much more robust to the number of samples used for computing the entropy, and hence more efficient for higher dimensional problems. Zi Wang 0004, Stefanie Jegelka |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel LearningabstractOptimization of high-dimensional black-box functions is an extremely challenging problem. While Bayesian optimization has emerged as a popular approach for optimizing black-box functions, its applicability has been limited to low-dimensional problems due to its computational and statistical challenges arising from high-dimensional settings. In this paper, we propose to tackle these challenges by (1) assuming a latent additive structure in the function and inferring it properly for more efficient and effective BO, and (2) performing multiple evaluations in parallel to reduce the number of iterations required by the method. Our novel approach learns the latent structure with Gibbs sampling and constructs batched queries using determinantal point processes. Experimental validations on both synthetic and real-world functions demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the existing state-of-the-art approaches. Zi Wang 0004, Chengtao Li, Stefanie Jegelka, Pushmeet Kohli |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Focused model-learning and planning for non-Gaussian continuous state-action systemsabstractWe introduce a framework for model learning and planning in stochastic domains with continuous state and action spaces and non-Gaussian transition models. It is efficient because (1) local models are estimated only when the planner requires them; (2) the planner focuses on the most relevant states to the current planning problem; and (3) the planner focuses on the most informative and/or high-value actions. Our theoretical analysis shows the validity and asymptotic optimality of the proposed approach. Empirically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm on a simulated multi-modal pushing problem. Zi Wang 0004, Stefanie Jegelka, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2016 | Optimization as Estimation with Gaussian Processes in Bandit SettingsabstractRecently, there has been rising interest in Bayesian optimization – the optimization of an unknown function with assumptions usually expressed by a Gaussian Process (GP) prior. We study an optimization strategy that directly uses an estimate of the argmax of the function. This strategy offers both practical and theoretical advantages: no tradeoff parameter needs to be selected, and, moreover, we establish close connections to the popular GP-UCB and GP-PI strategies. Our approach can be understood as automatically and adaptively trading off exploration and exploitation in GP-UCB and GP-PI. We illustrate the effects of this adaptive tuning via bounds on the regret as well as an extensive empirical evaluation on robotics and vision tasks, demonstrating the robustness of this strategy for a range of performance criteria. Zi Wang 0004, Bolei Zhou, Stefanie Jegelka |
AISTATS | 1 |