Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fei Xia 0005

dblp:79/1081-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 84% Web and social media mining · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.612022
SWFormer: Sparse Window Transformer for 3D Object Detection in Point Clouds · ECCV (10) 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
point cloud object detection
0.612022
SWFormer: Sparse Window Transformer for 3D Object Detection in Point Clouds · ECCV (10) 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
relational topic model
0.422015
Discriminative Relational Topic Models · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015
Generalized Relational Topic Models with Data Augmentation · IJCAI 2013
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.212013
Generalized Relational Topic Models with Data Augmentation · IJCAI 2013
Data mining › text mining › topic model
relational topic model
0.212013
Generalized Relational Topic Models with Data Augmentation · IJCAI 2013
Data mining › text mining
topic model
0.212013
Generalized Relational Topic Models with Data Augmentation · IJCAI 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.6regularized bayesian inference · 0.4max-margin hinge loss · 0.4collapsed gibbs sampling · 0.4data augmentation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 SWFormer: Sparse Window Transformer for 3D Object Detection in Point Clouds
Mingxing Tan, Weiyue Wang 0002, Chenxi Liu 0001, Fei Xia 0005, Zhaoqi Leng, Dragomir Anguelov
ECCV (10)5
2015 Discriminative Relational Topic Models
abstract
Relational topic models (RTMs) provide a probabilistic generative process to describe both the link structure and document contents for document networks, and they have shown promise on predicting network structures and discovering latent topic representations. However, existing RTMs have limitations in both the restricted model expressiveness and incapability of dealing with imbalanced network data. To expand the scope and improve the inference accuracy of RTMs, this paper presents three extensions: 1) unlike the common link likelihood with a diagonal weight matrix that allows the-same-topic interactions only, we generalize it to use a full weight matrix that captures all pairwise topic interactions and is applicable to asymmetric networks; 2) instead of doing standard Bayesian inference, we perform regularized Bayesian inference (RegBayes) with a regularization parameter to deal with the imbalanced link structure issue in real networks and improve the discriminative ability of learned latent representations; and 3) instead of doing variational approximation with strict mean-field assumptions, we present collapsed Gibbs sampling algorithms for the generalized relational topic models by exploring data augmentation without making restricting assumptions. Under the generic RegBayes framework, we carefully investigate two popular discriminative loss functions, namely, the logistic log-loss and the max-margin hinge loss. Experimental results on several real network datasets demonstrate the significance of these extensions on improving prediction performance.
Ning Chen 0002, Jun Zhu 0001, Fei Xia 0005, Bo Zhang 0010
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2014 Max-margin latent feature relational models for entity-attribute networks
abstract
Link prediction is a fundamental task in statistical analysis of network data. Though much research has concentrated on predicting entity-entity relationships in homogeneous networks, it has attracted increasing attentions to predict relationships in heterogeneous networks, which consist of multiple types of nodes and relational links. Existing work on heterogeneous network link prediction mainly focuses on using input features that are explicitly extracted by humans. This paper presents an approach to automatically learn latent features from partially observed heterogeneous networks, with a particular focus on entity-attribute networks (EANs), and making predictions for unseen pairs. To make the latent features discriminative, we adopt the max-margin idea under the framework of maximum entropy discrimination (MED). Our maximum entropy discrimination joint relational model (MED-JRM) can jointly predict entity-entity relationships as well as the missing attributes of entities in EANs. Experimental results on several real networks demonstrate that our model has improved performance over state-of-the-art homogeneous and heterogeneous network link prediction algorithms.
Fei Xia 0005, Ning Chen 0002, Jun Zhu 0001, Aonan Zhang, Xiaoming Jin
IJCNN1
2013 Generalized Relational Topic Models with Data Augmentation
Ning Chen 0002, Jun Zhu 0001, Fei Xia 0005, Bo Zhang 0010
IJCAI3