Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yongjoo Park

dblp:79/583 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
26ranked-venue papers
7as first author
15since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3786-6214ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 20 · 7 first-author · 10 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
17 papers
Query processing and optimization · 31% Information retrieval · 24% Indexing and storage engines · 20%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers
Storage systems · 38% Distributed systems · 36% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 21%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 87% Vision and language · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Runtime systems and virtual machines · 57% Operating systems · 43%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23%

Topics — the 30 heaviest of 45, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing
2.362023
A Step Toward Deep Online Aggregation · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
SAQE: Practical Privacy-Preserving Approximate Query Processing for Data Federations · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
VerdictDB: Universalizing Approximate Query Processing · SIGMOD Conference 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
QStore: Quantization-Aware Compressed Model Storage · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
filtered vector search
0.912025
SIEVE: Effective Filtered Vector Search with Collection of Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Indexing and storage engines
vector index
0.912025
SIEVE: Effective Filtered Vector Search with Collection of Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Information retrieval › similarity search
vector similarity search
0.912025
SIEVE: Effective Filtered Vector Search with Collection of Indexes · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › database accelerator
FPGA-based query processing
0.912025
UPP: Universal Predicate Pushdown to Smart Storage · ISCA 2025
Storage systems › computational storage
in-storage computing
0.912025
UPP: Universal Predicate Pushdown to Smart Storage · ISCA 2025
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.812024
Kishu: Time-Traveling for Computational Notebooks · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › checkpointing
incremental checkpointing
0.812024
Kishu: Time-Traveling for Computational Notebooks · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Indexing and storage engines
hierarchical index
0.712023
AirIndex: Versatile Index Tuning Through Data and Storage · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Database system architecture and tuning
index tuning
0.712023
AirIndex: Versatile Index Tuning Through Data and Storage · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Indexing and storage engines
learned index
0.712023
AirIndex: Versatile Index Tuning Through Data and Storage · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Indexing and storage engines › storage management
memory management
0.712023
S/C: Speeding up Data Materialization with Bounded Memory · ICDE 2023
Query processing and optimization › aggregation
online aggregation
0.712023
A Step Toward Deep Online Aggregation · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2023
Information retrieval › search engines › web crawling
refresh scheduling
0.712023
S/C: Speeding up Data Materialization with Bounded Memory · ICDE 2023
Query processing and optimization
view maintenance
0.712023
S/C: Speeding up Data Materialization with Bounded Memory · ICDE 2023
Operating systems › fault tolerance
checkpoint and rollback
0.712023
ElasticNotebook: Enabling Live Migration for Computational Notebooks · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023
Information retrieval › indexing
document indexing
0.612022
Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing · ICDE 2022
Information retrieval
search engines
0.612022
Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing · ICDE 2022
Distributed and cloud data management › federated database
federated query processing
0.412020
SAQE: Practical Privacy-Preserving Approximate Query Processing for Data Federations · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Query processing and optimization › secure query processing
privacy-preserving query processing
0.412020
SAQE: Practical Privacy-Preserving Approximate Query Processing for Data Federations · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Query processing and optimization
selectivity estimation
0.412020
QuickSel: Quick Selectivity Learning with Mixture Models · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Query processing and optimization › approximate query processing
error estimation
0.312018
Demonstration of VerdictDB, the Platform-Independent AQP System · SIGMOD Conference 2018
Query processing and optimization
result reuse
0.312017
Database Learning: Toward a Database that Becomes Smarter Every Time · SIGMOD Conference 2017
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
vision-language model reasoning
0.312025
Cache-of-Thought: Master-Apprentice Framework for Cost-Effective Vision Language Model Reasoning · EMNLP 2025
Query processing and optimization › shared computation
shared filter evaluation
0.312025
UPP: Universal Predicate Pushdown to Smart Storage · ISCA 2025
Storage systems
compressed data storage
0.312025
QStore: Quantization-Aware Compressed Model Storage · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Data mining
sampling
0.212016
Visualization-aware sampling for very large databases · ICDE 2016
Visualization and visual analytics › data reduction
sampling for visualization
0.212016
Visualization-aware sampling for very large databases · ICDE 2016
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search
0.212015
Neighbor-Sensitive Hashing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantization · 2.6incremental checkout · 2.3co-variable granularity checkpointing · 2.3hardware-software co-design · 1.7bitwise comparison · 1.7graph-based optimization · 1.3workload-aware index selection · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9human-subject study · 0.9caching · 0.9analytical cost model · 0.9sampling · 0.7replication planning · 0.7dependency analysis · 0.7cost modeling · 0.7statistical index · 0.6asynchronous parallel network requests · 0.6approximate query processing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 MojoFrame: Dataframe Library in Mojo Language
abstract
Mojo is an emerging programming language built on MLIR (Multi-Level Intermediate Representation) and supports JIT (Just-in-Time) compilation. It enables transparent hardware-specific optimizations (e.g., for CPUs and GPUs), while allowing users to express their logic using Python-like user-friendly syntax. Mojo has demonstrated strong performance on tensor operations; however, its capabilities for relational operations (e.g., filtering, join, and group-by aggregation) common in data science workflows, remain unexplored. To date, no dataframe implementation exists in the Mojo ecosystem. In this paper, we introduce the first Mojo-native dataframe library, called MojoFrame, that supports core relational operations and user-defined functions (UDFs). MojoFrame is built on top of Mojo's tensor to achieve fast operations on numeric columns, while utilizing a cardinality-aware approach to effectively integrate non-numeric columns for flexible data representation. To achieve high efficiency, MojoFrame takes significantly different approaches than existing libraries. We show that MojoFrame supports all operations for TPC-H queries and a selection of TPC-DS queries with promising performance, achieving up to 4.60x speedup versus existing dataframe libraries in other programming languages. Nevertheless, there remain optimization opportunities for MojoFrame (and the Mojo language), particularly in in-memory data representation and dictionary operations.
Shengya Huang, Zhaoheng Li, Derek Werner, Yongjoo Park
ICDE4
2025 Enhancing Computational Notebooks with Code+Data Space Versioning
abstract
There is a gap between how people explore data and how Jupyterlike computational notebooks are designed.People explore data nonlinearly, using execution undos, branching, and/or complete reverts, whereas notebooks are designed for sequential exploration.Recent works like ForkIt are still insufficient to support these multiple modes of nonlinear exploration in a unified way.In this work, we address the challenge by introducing twodimensional code+data space versioning for computational notebooks and verifying its effectiveness using our prototype system, Kishuboard, which integrates with Jupyter.By adjusting code and data knobs, users of Kishuboard can intuitively manage the state of computational notebooks in a flexible way, thereby achieving both execution rollbacks and checkouts across complex multi-branch exploration history.Moreover, this two-dimensional versioning mechanism can easily be presented along with a friendly one-dimensional history.Human subject studies indicate that Kishuboard significantly enhances user productivity in various data science tasks.
Hanxi Fang, Supawit Chockchowwat, Hari Sundaram, Yongjoo Park
CHI4
2025 Cache-of-Thought: Master-Apprentice Framework for Cost-Effective Vision Language Model Reasoning
abstract
Mingyuan Wu, Jize Jiang, Haozhen Zheng, Meitang Li, Zhaoheng Li, Beitong Tian, Bo Chen, Yongjoo Park, Minjia Zhang, ChengXiang Zhai, Klara Nahrstedt. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Mingyuan Wu, Jize Jiang, Haozhen Zheng, Meitang Li, Zhaoheng Li, Beitong Tian, Bo Chen 0025, Yongjoo Park, Minjia Zhang, ChengXiang Zhai, Klara Nahrstedt
EMNLP8
2025 UPP: Universal Predicate Pushdown to Smart Storage
abstract
In large-scale analytics, in-storage processing (ISP) can significantly boost query performance by letting ISP engines (e.g., FPGAs) preselect only the relevant data before sending them to databases.This reduces the amount of not only data transfer between storage and host, but also database computation, facilitating faster query processing.However, existing ISP solutions cannot effectively support a wide range of modern analytical queries because they only support simple combinations of frequently used operators (e.g., =, <), particularly on fixed-length columns.As modern databases allow filter predicates to include numerous operators/functions (e.g., dateadd) compatible with diverse data formats (and their complex combinations), it becomes more challenging for existing approaches to accelerate such queries efficiently.To address the limitations, we propose a new ISP approach, called Universal Predicate Pushdown (UPP), that can accelerate modern analytical databases, leveraging hardware/software co-design for a high level of flexibility.Our core insight is that instead of programming for individual filter operators/functions, we should devise a compact instruction set architecture (ISA) tailored explicitly for predicate pushdown.The software (i.e., database) layer recognizes and compiles various general filters (called a universal predicate) to a set of UPP-compliant instructions, which are then processed efficiently by FPGA using bitwise comparisons, leveraging lightweight metadata.In our experiments with a 100 GB TPC-H dataset, UPP running on SmartSSD could speed up Spark's end-to-end query performance by 1.2×-7.9×without changing input data formats.
Ipoom Jeong, Jinghan Huang 0001, Chuxuan Hu, Dohyun Park, Jaeyoung Kang 0004, Nam Sung Kim, Yongjoo Park
ISCA7
2025 Intel ® in-Memory Analytics Accelerator: Performance Characterization and Guidelines
abstract
Improvements in CPU performance have significantly slowed due to the demise of Dennard scaling, making it increasingly challenging to cost-effectively process the exponentially growing volumes of data. As a result, there is a growing trend of offloading frequently used functions to hardware accelerators to enhance application performance while reducing expensive CPU cycle consumption. In line with this trend, Intel introduced the InMemory Analytics Accelerator (IAA) as an on-chip accelerator in its$\mathbf{4}^{\text{th}}$-generation Xeon®Scalable CPUs (Sapphire Rapids). IAA is designed to offload common big data and in-memory analytics functions from CPUs, such as CRC64, expand, extract, scan, and select, in addition to (de)compression. As IAA is integrated with CPUs as an on-chip accelerator, it can directly access the CPU's cache and memory in a cache-coherent manner, offering low latency and power consumption with reduced programming complexity compared to off-chip accelerators. In this paper, we first introduce the hardware and software architectures of IAA, highlighting its latest features. We then evaluate IAA's performance using various microbenchmarks and widely used analytics applications, including Pandas, Citus, and ClickHouse. Finally, based on our findings, we provide guidelines for effectively utilizing and optimizing IAA for analytics applications.
Jaeyoung Kang 0004, Qirong Xia, Ipoom Jeong, Yongjoo Park, Nam Sung Kim
ISPASS4
2025 Chipmink: Efficient Delta Identification for Massive Object Graphs
Supawit Chockchowwat, Sumay Thakurdesai, Zhaoheng Li, Matthew Krafczyk, Yongjoo Park
Proc. VLDB Endow.5
2025 SIEVE: Effective Filtered Vector Search with Collection of Indexes
abstract
Real-world tasks such as recommending videos tagged kids can be reduced to finding similar vectors associated with hard predicates. This task, filtered vector search , is challenging as prior state-of-the-art graph-based (unfiltered) similarity search techniques degenerate when hard constraints are considered: effective graph-based filtered similarity search relies on sufficient connectivity for reaching similar items within a few hops. To consider predicates, recent works propose modifying graph traversal to visit only items that satisfy predicates. However, they fail to offer the just-a-few-hops property for a wide range of predicates: they must restrict predicates significantly or lose efficiency if only few items satisfy predicates. We propose an opposite approach: instead of constraining traversal, we build many indexes each serving different predicate forms. For effective construction, we devise a three-dimensional analytical model capturing relationships among index size, search time, and recall, with which we follow a workload-aware approach to pack as many useful indexes as possible into a collection. At query time, the analytical model is employed yet again to discern the one that offers the fastest search at a given recall. We show superior performance and support on datasets with varying selectivities and forms: our approach achieves up to 8.06× speedup while having as low as 1% build time versus other indexes, with less than 2.15× memory of a standard HNSW graph and modest knowledge of past workloads.
Zhaoheng Li, Silu Huang, Yongjoo Park, Jianjun Chen 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2025 QStore: Quantization-Aware Compressed Model Storage
Raunak Shah, Zhaoheng Li, Yongjoo Park
Proc. VLDB Endow.3
2024 Kishu: Time-Traveling for Computational Notebooks
abstract
Computational notebooks (e.g., Jupyter, Google Colab) are widely used by data scientists. A key feature of notebooks is the interactive computing model of iteratively executing cells (i.e., a set of statements) and observing the result (e.g., model or plot). Unfortunately, existing notebook systems do not offer time-traveling to past states : when the user executes a cell, the notebook session state consisting of user-defined variables can be irreversibly modified —e.g., the user cannot 'un-drop' a dataframe column. This is because, unlike DBMS, existing notebook systems do not keep track of the session state. Existing techniques for checkpointing and restoring session states, such as OS-level memory snapshot or application-level session dump, are insufficient: checkpointing can incur prohibitive storage costs and may fail, while restoration can only be inefficiently performed from scratch by fully loading checkpoint files. In this paper, we introduce a new notebook system, Kishu, that offers time-traveling to and from arbitrary notebook states using an efficient and fault-tolerant incremental checkpoint and checkout mechanism. Kishu creates incremental checkpoints that are small and correctly preserve complex inter-variable dependencies at a novel Co-variable granularity. Then, to return to a previous state, Kishu accurately identifies the state difference between the current and target states to perform incremental checkout at sub-second latency with minimal data loading. Kishu is compatible with 146 object classes from popular data science libraries (e.g., Ray, Spark, PyTorch), and reduces checkpoint size and checkout time by up to 4.55× and 9.02×, respectively, on a variety of notebooks.
Zhaoheng Li, Supawit Chockchowwat, Areet Sheth, Yongjoo Park, Ribhav Sahu
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2023 S/C: Speeding up Data Materialization with Bounded Memory
abstract
With data pipeline tools and the expressiveness of SQL, managing interdependent materialized views (MVs) are becoming increasingly easy. These MVs are updated repeatedly upon new data ingestion (e.g., daily), from which database admins can observe performance metrics (e.g., refresh time of each MV, size on disk) in a consistent way for different types of updates (full vs. incremental) and for different systems (single node, distributed, cloud-hosted). One missed opportunity is that existing data systems treat those MV updates as independent SQL statements without fully exploiting their dependency information and performance metrics. However, if we know that the result of a SQL statement will be consumed immediately after for subsequent operations, those subsequent operations do not have to wait until the early results are fully materialized on storage because the results are already readily available in memory. Of course, this may come at a cost because keeping those results in memory (even temporarily) will reduce the amount of available memory; thus, our decision should be careful.In this paper, we introduce a new system, called S/C, which tackles this problem through efficient creation and update of a set of MVs with acyclic dependencies among them. S/C judiciously uses bounded memory to reduce the end-to-end MV refresh time by short-circuiting expensive reads and writes; S/C’s objective function accurately estimates the time savings from keeping intermediate data in memory for particular periods. Our solution jointly optimizes an MV refresh order, what data to keep in memory, and when to release the data from memory. At a high level, S/C still materializes all data exactly as defined in MV definitions; thus, it does not impact any service-level agreements. In our experiments with TPC-DS datasets (up to 1TB), we show that S/C's optimization can speedup end-to-end runtime by 1.04×–5.08× with (only) 1.6GB memory.
Zhaoheng Li, Xinyu Pi, Yongjoo Park
ICDE3
2023 AirIndex: Versatile Index Tuning Through Data and Storage
abstract
The end-to-end lookup latency of a hierarchical index---such as a B-tree or a learned index---is determined by its structure such as the number of layers, the kinds of branching functions appearing in each layer, the amount of data we must fetch from layers, etc. Our primary observation is that by optimizing those structural parameters (or designs) specifically to a target system's I/O characteristics (e.g., latency, bandwidth), we can offer a faster lookup compared to the ones that are not optimized. Can we develop a systematic method for finding those optimal design parameters? Ideally, the method must have the potential to generate almost any existing index or a novel combination of them for the fastest possible lookup. In this work, we present new data and an I/O-aware index builder (called AirIndex) that can find high-speed hierarchical index designs in a principled way. Specifically, AirIndex minimizes an objective function expressing the end-to-end latency in terms of various designs---the number of layers, types of layers, and more---for given data and a storage profile, using a graph-based optimization method purpose-built to address the computational challenges rising from the inter-dependencies among index layers and the exponentially many candidate parameters in a large search space. Our empirical studies confirm that AirIndex can find optimal index designs, build optimal indexes within the times comparable to existing methods, and deliver up to 4.1x faster lookup than a lightweight B-tree library (LMDB), 3.3x--46.3x faster than state-of-the-art learned indexes (RMI/CDFShop, PGM-index, ALEX/APEX, PLEX), and 2.0 faster than Data Calculator's suggestion on various dataset and storage settings.
Supawit Chockchowwat, Wenjie Liu 0007, Yongjoo Park
Proc. ACM Manag. Data3
2023 A Step Toward Deep Online Aggregation
abstract
For exploratory data analysis, it is often desirable to know what answers you are likely to get before actually obtaining those answers. This can potentially be achieved by designing systems to offer the estimates of a data operation result-say op(data)-earlier in the process based on partial data processing. Those estimates continuously refine as more data is processed and finally converge to the exact answer. Unfortunately, the existing techniques-called Online Aggregation (OLA)-are limited to a single operation; that is, we cannot obtain the estimates for op(op(data)) or op(...(op(data))). If this Deep OLA becomes possible, data analysts will be able to explore data more interactively using complex cascade operations. In this work, we take a step toward Deep OLA with evolving data frames (edf), a novel data model to offer OLA for nested ops-op(...(op(data)))-by representing an evolving structured data (with converging estimates) that is closed under set operations. That is, op(edf) produces yet another edf; thus, we can freely apply successive operations to edf and obtain an OLA output for each op. We evaluate its viability with Wake, an edf-based OLA system, by examining against state-of-the-art OLA and non-OLA systems. In our experiments on TPC-H dataset, Wake produces its first estimates 4.93× faster (median)-with 1.3× median slowdown for exact answers-compared to conventional systems. Besides its generality, Wake is also 1.92× faster (median) than existing OLA systems in producing estimates of under 1% relative errors.
Nikhil Sheoran, Supawit Chockchowwat, Arav Chheda, Suwen Wang, Riya Verma, Yongjoo Park
Proc. ACM Manag. Data6
2023 ElasticNotebook: Enabling Live Migration for Computational Notebooks
abstract
Computational notebooks (e.g., Jupyter, Google Colab) are widely used for interactive data science and machine learning. In those frameworks, users can start a session , then execute cells (i.e., a set of statements) to create variables, train models, visualize results, etc. Unfortunately, existing notebook systems do not offer live migration: when a notebook launches on a new machine, it loses its state , preventing users from continuing their tasks from where they had left off. This is because, unlike DBMS, the sessions directly rely on underlying kernels (e.g., Python/R interpreters) without an additional data management layer. Existing techniques for preserving states, such as copying all variables or OS-level checkpointing, are unreliable (often fail), inefficient, and platform-dependent. Also, re-running code from scratch can be highly time-consuming. In this paper, we introduce a new notebook system, Elastic-Notebook, that offers live migration via checkpointing/restoration using a novel mechanism that is reliable, efficient, and platform-independent. Specifically, by observing all cell executions via transparent, lightweight monitoring, ElasticNotebook can find a reliable and efficient way (i.e., replication plan ) for reconstructing the original session state, considering variable-cell dependencies, observed runtime, variable sizes, etc. To this end, our new graph-based optimization problem finds how to reconstruct all variables (efficiently) from a subset of variables that can be transferred across machines. We show that ElasticNotebook reduces end-to-end migration and restoration times by 85%-98% and 94%-99%, respectively, on a variety (i.e., Kaggle, JWST, and Tutorial) of notebooks with negligible runtime and memory overheads of <2.5% and <10%.
Zhaoheng Li, Pranav Gor, Rahul Prabhu, Yuzhou Mao, Yongjoo Park
Proc. VLDB Endow.6
2022 The Effects of Teaching Modality on Collaborative Learning: A Controlled Study
abstract
This Research Full Paper presents our findings of studying the effects of teaching modality on collaborative learning by comparing data from two sections of a Database Systems course offered simultaneously, with one offered fully face-to-face in a classroom setting while the other is offered online through a flipped-classroom model. Both sections utilized a collaborative learning approach where students work on group activities for part of the class meeting. Since the two sections were almost identical except for the teaching modality, we are provided with a unique opportunity to study the effect of teaching modalities on collaborative learning. As part of this study, we analyze four crucial data sources: 1) student performance data from the grade book 2) student performance data from the online learning management platform 3) an end-of-semester survey given by the instructor and 4) an end-of-semester survey given by the university. We extract insights on the impact of teaching modalities on collaborative learning in order to identify factors that can enhance collaborative learning. We also study the effect of teaching modalities on students’ performance. We visualize our findings to differentiate between the two modalities, and draw on the strengths of each section to establish recommendations for the instructors for course improvement efforts.
Sophia Yang, Yongjoo Park, Abdussalam Alawini
FIE2
2022 Airphant: Cloud-oriented Document Indexing
abstract
Modern data warehouses can scale compute nodes independently of storage. These systems persist their data on cloud storage, which is always available and cost-efficient. Ad-hoc compute nodes then fetch necessary data on-demand from cloud storage. This ability to quickly scale or shrink data systems is highly beneficial if query workloads may change over time. We apply this new architecture to search engines with a focus on optimizing their latencies in cloud environments. However, simply placing existing search engines (e.g., Apache Lucene) on top of cloud storage significantly increases their end-to-end query latencies (i.e., more than 6 seconds on average in one of our studies). This is because their indexes can incur multiple network round-trips due to their hierarchical structure (e.g., skip lists, B-trees, learned indexes). To address this issue, we develop a new statistical index, called IoU Sketch. For lookup, IoU Sketch makes multiple asynchronous network requests in parallel. While IoU Sketch may fetch more bytes than existing indexes, it significantly reduces the index lookup time because parallel requests do not block each other. Based on IoU Sketch, we built an end-to-end search engine called Airphant; we describe how Airphant builds, optimizes, and manages IoU Sketch, and ultimately supports keyword-based querying. In our experiments with four real datasets, Airphant's average end-to-end latencies are between 13 milliseconds and 300 milliseconds, up to 8.97× faster than Apache Lucence and 113.39× faster than Elasticsearch.
Supawit Chockchowwat, Chaitanya Sood, Yongjoo Park
ICDE3
2020 QuickSel: Quick Selectivity Learning with Mixture Models
abstract
Estimating the selectivity of a query is a key step in almost any cost-based query optimizer. Most of today's databases rely on histograms or samples that are periodically refreshed by re-scanning the data as the underlying data changes. Since frequent scans are costly, these statistics are often stale and lead to poor selectivity estimates. As an alternative to scans, query-driven histograms have been proposed, which refine the histograms based on the actual selectivities of the observed queries. Unfortunately, these approaches are either too costly to use in practice---i.e., require an exponential number of buckets---or quickly lose their advantage as they observe more queries. In this paper, we propose a selectivity learning framework, called QuickSel, which falls into the query-driven paradigm but does not use histograms. Instead, it builds an internal model of the underlying data, which can be refined significantly faster (e.g., only 1.9 milliseconds for 300 queries). This fast refinement allows QuickSel to continuously learn from each query and yield increasingly more accurate selectivity estimates over time. Unlike query-driven histograms, QuickSel relies on a mixture model and a new optimization algorithm for training its model. Our extensive experiments on two real-world datasets confirm that, given the same target accuracy, QuickSel is 34.0x--179.4x faster than state-of-the-art query-driven histograms, including ISOMER and STHoles. Further, given the same space budget, QuickSel is 26.8%--91.8% more accurate than periodically-updated histograms and samples, respectively.
Yongjoo Park, Shucheng Zhong, Barzan Mozafari
SIGMOD Conference1
2020 SAQE: Practical Privacy-Preserving Approximate Query Processing for Data Federations
Johes Bater, Yongjoo Park, Xi He 0001, Xiao Wang 0012, Jennie Rogers
Proc. VLDB Endow.2
2019 BlinkML: Efficient Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Probabilistic Guarantees
abstract
The rising volume of datasets has made training machine learning (ML) models a major computational cost in the enterprise. Given the iterative nature of model and parameter tuning, many analysts use a small sample of their entire data during their initial stage of analysis to make quick decisions (e.g., what features or hyperparameters to use) and use the entire dataset only in later stages (i.e., when they have converged to a specific model). This sampling, however, is performed in an ad-hoc fashion. Most practitioners cannot precisely capture the effect of sampling on the quality of their model, and eventually on their decision-making process during the tuning phase. Moreover, without systematic support for sampling operators, many optimizations and reuse opportunities are lost. In this paper, we introduce BlinkML, a system for fast, quality-guaranteed ML training. BlinkML allows users to make error-computation tradeoffs: instead of training a model on their full data (i.e., full model), BlinkML can quickly train an approximate model with quality guarantees using a sample. The quality guarantees ensure that, with high probability, the approximate model makes the same predictions as the full model. BlinkML currently supports any ML model that relies on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which includes Generalized Linear Models (e.g., linear regression, logistic regression, max entropy classifier, Poisson regression) as well as PPCA (Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis). Our experiments show that BlinkML can speed up the training of large-scale ML tasks by 6.26×?629× while guaranteeing the same predictions, with 95% probability, as the full model.
Yongjoo Park, Jingyi Qing, Xiaoyang Shen, Barzan Mozafari
SIGMOD Conference1
2018 Demonstration of VerdictDB, the Platform-Independent AQP System
abstract
We demonstrate VerdictDB, the first platform-independent approximate query processing (AQP) system. Unlike existing AQP systems that are tightly-integrated into a specific database, VerdictDB operates at the driver-level, acting as a middleware between users and off-the-shelf database systems. In other words, VerdictDB requires no modifications to the database internals; it simply relies on rewriting incoming queries such that the standard execution of the rewritten queries under relational semantics yields approximate answers to the original queries. VerdictDB exploits a novel technique for error estimation called variational subsampling, which is amenable to efficient computation via SQL. In this demonstration, we showcase VerdictDB's performance benefits (up to two orders of magnitude) compared to the queries that are issued directly to existing query engines. We also illustrate that the approximate answers returned by VerdictDB are nearly identical to the exact answers. We use Apache Spark SQL and Amazon Redshift as two examples of modern distributed query platforms. We allow the audience to explore VerdictDB using a web-based interface (e.g., Hue or Apache Zeppelin) to issue queries and visualize their answers. VerdictDB is currently open-sourced and available under Apache License (V2).
Yongjoo Park, Idris Hanafi, Jacob Yatvitskiy, Barzan Mozafari
SIGMOD Conference2
2018 VerdictDB: Universalizing Approximate Query Processing
abstract
Despite 25 years of research in academia, approximate query processing (AQP) has had little industrial adoption. One of the major causes of this slow adoption is the reluctance of traditional vendors to make radical changes to their legacy codebases, and the preoccupation of newer vendors (e.g., SQL-on-Hadoop products) with implementing standard features. Additionally, the few AQP engines that are available are each tied to a specific platform and require users to completely abandon their existing databases---an unrealistic expectation given the infancy of the AQP technology. Therefore, we argue that a universal solution is needed: a database-agnostic approximation engine that will widen the reach of this emerging technology across various platforms.
Yongjoo Park, Barzan Mozafari, Joseph Sorenson
SIGMOD Conference1
2017 Active Database Learning
Yongjoo Park
CIDR1
2017 Database Learning: Toward a Database that Becomes Smarter Every Time
abstract
In today's databases, previous query answers rarely benefit answering future queries. For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, we change this paradigm in an approximate query processing (AQP) context. We make the following observation: the answer to each query reveals some degree of knowledge about the answer to another query because their answers stem from the same underlying distribution that has produced the entire dataset. Exploiting and refining this knowledge should allow us to answer queries more analytically, rather than by reading enormous amounts of raw data. Also, processing more queries should continuously enhance our knowledge of the underlying distribution, and hence lead to increasingly faster response times for future queries.
Yongjoo Park, Ahmad Shahab Tajik, Michael J. Cafarella, Barzan Mozafari
SIGMOD Conference1
2016 Visualization-aware sampling for very large databases
abstract
Interactive visualizations are crucial in ad hoc data exploration and analysis. However, with the growing number of massive datasets, generating visualizations in interactive timescales is increasingly challenging. One approach for improving the speed of the visualization tool is via data reduction in order to reduce the computational overhead, but at a potential cost in visualization accuracy. Common data reduction techniques, such as uniform and stratified sampling, do not exploit the fact that the sampled tuples will be transformed into a visualization for human consumption. We propose a visualization-aware sampling (VAS) that guarantees high quality visualizations with a small subset of the entire dataset. We validate our method when applied to scatter and map plots for three common visualization goals: regression, density estimation, and clustering. The key to our sampling method's success is in choosing a set of tuples that minimizes a visualization-inspired loss function. While existing sampling approaches minimize the error of aggregation queries, we focus on a loss function that maximizes the visual fidelity of scatter plots. Our user study confirms that our proposed loss function correlates strongly with user success in using the resulting visualizations. Our experiments show that (i) VAS improves user's success by up to 35% in various visualization tasks, and (ii) VAS can achieve a required visualization quality up to 400× faster.
Yongjoo Park, Michael J. Cafarella, Barzan Mozafari
ICDE1
2015 Neighbor-Sensitive Hashing
abstract
Approximate k NN ( k -nearest neighbor) techniques using binary hash functions are among the most commonly used approaches for overcoming the prohibitive cost of performing exact k NN queries. However, the success of these techniques largely depends on their hash functions' ability to distinguish k NN items; that is, the k NN items retrieved based on data items' hashcodes , should include as many true k NN items as possible. A widely-adopted principle for this process is to ensure that similar items are assigned to the same hashcode so that the items with the hashcodes similar to a query's hashcode are likely to be true neighbors. In this work, we abandon this heavily-utilized principle and pursue the opposite direction for generating more effective hash functions for k NN tasks. That is, we aim to increase the distance between similar items in the hashcode space, instead of reducing it. Our contribution begins by providing theoretical analysis on why this revolutionary and seemingly counter-intuitive approach leads to a more accurate identification of k NN items. Our analysis is followed by a proposal for a hashing algorithm that embeds this novel principle. Our empirical studies confirm that a hashing algorithm based on this counter-intuitive idea significantly improves the efficiency and accuracy of state-of-the-art techniques.
Yongjoo Park, Michael J. Cafarella, Barzan Mozafari
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2013 Brainwash: A Data System for Feature Engineering
Michael R. Anderson, Dolan Antenucci, Victor Bittorf, Matthew Burgess, Michael J. Cafarella, Arun Kumar 0001, Feng Niu, Yongjoo Park, Christopher Ré, Ce Zhang 0001
CIDR8
2001 Comparison of Several Machine Learning Techniques in Pursuit-Evasion Games
Jacky Baltes, Yongjoo Park
RoboCup2