Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brent Edmunds

dblp:80/10733 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › coordinate descent
block coordinate descent
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
non-smooth non-convex optimization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel optimization
asynchronous parallel optimization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
nonconvex matrix factorization
0.212016
The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient · 0.8proximal alternating linearized minimization · 0.8asynchronous parallelization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 The Sound of APALM Clapping: Faster Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization with Stochastic Asynchronous PALM
abstract
We introduce the Stochastic Asynchronous Proximal Alternating Linearized Minimization (SAPALM) method, a block coordinate stochastic proximal-gradient method for solving nonconvex, nonsmooth optimization problems. SAPALM is the first asynchronous parallel optimization method that provably converges on a large class of nonconvex, nonsmooth problems. We prove that SAPALM matches the best known rates of convergence --- among synchronous or asynchronous methods --- on this problem class. We provide upper bounds on the number of workers for which we can expect to see a linear speedup, which match the best bounds known for less complex problems, and show that in practice SAPALM achieves this linear speedup. We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on several matrix factorization problems.
Damek Davis, Brent Edmunds, Madeleine Udell
NIPS2
2011 PedSeg: GPS tracks as priors for overhead image segmentation
abstract
We introduce PedSeg, a system for computing the boundaries of visually distinct geo-spatial objects. Knowing the precise boundaries or even bounding box approximations of geo-spatial objects is important for maintaining existing repositories such as gazetteers as well creating volunteered geographic information sources such as OpenStreetMap. PedSeg uses active contour image segmentation to determine an object's spatial extent from high-resolution overhead imagery. The novel aspect of this work is that the image segmentation is seeded with a GPS track acquired by simply walking around or otherwise traversing the approximate boundary of the target object (thus the prefix Ped). The technique is intended to be completely automated once the GPS track has been loaded into the system. This provides several advantages such as the user not needing to be skilled at image editing. In fact, the user does not even need to access, view, or interact with the imagery. The use of active contour image segmentation compensates for inaccuracies in the user acquired GPS tracks due to GPS error or the physical inaccessibility of the object boundary. We present examples of using PedSeg to compute the boundaries of a number of geo-spatial objects.
Shawn D. Newsam, Brent Edmunds, Andrew Pierce
GIS2