Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Sandler
dblp:80/1930
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 56% Interaction techniques and input · 44% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
electronic voting |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | VoteBox: A Tamper-evident, Verifiable Electronic Voting System · USENIX Security Symposium 2008 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
verifiable voting |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | VoteBox: A Tamper-evident, Verifiable Electronic Voting System · USENIX Security Symposium 2008 |
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
subjective vs objective usability measures |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Electronic voting machines versus traditional methods: improved preference, similar performance · CHI 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cryptographic protocols · 0.1comparative usability study · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Electronic voting machines versus traditional methods: improved preference, similar performanceabstractIn the 2006 U.S. election, it was estimated that over 66 million people would be voting on direct recording electronic (DRE) systems in 34% of the nation's counties [8]. Although these computer-based voting systems have been widely adopted, they have not been empirically proven to be more usable than their predecessors. The series of studies reported here compares usability data from a DRE with those from more traditional voting technologies (paper ballots, punch cards, and lever machines). Results indicate that there were little differences between the DRE and these older methods in efficiency or effectiveness. However, in terms of user satisfaction, the DRE was significantly better than the older methods. Paper ballots also perform well, but participants were much more satisfied with their experiences voting on the DRE. The disconnect between subjective and objective usability has potential policy ramifications. Sarah P. Everett, Kristen K. Greene, Michael D. Byrne, Dan S. Wallach, Kyle Derr, Daniel Sandler, Ted Torous |
CHI | 6 |
| 2008 | VoteBox: A Tamper-evident, Verifiable Electronic Voting System
Daniel Sandler, Kyle Derr, Dan S. Wallach |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |