Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guido Dornhege

dblp:80/306 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Wearable and physiological sensing · 59% Accessibility and assistive technology · 41%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Medical and health informatics · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology
0.122003
Increase Information Transfer Rates in BCI by CSP Extension to Multi-class · NIPS 2003
Combining Features for BCI · NIPS 2002
Wearable and physiological sensing
brain-computer interface
0.122003
Increase Information Transfer Rates in BCI by CSP Extension to Multi-class · NIPS 2003
Combining Features for BCI · NIPS 2002
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface
0.112005
Optimizing spatio-temporal filters for improving Brain-Computer Interfacing · NIPS 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics
0.112005
Optimizing spatio-temporal filters for improving Brain-Computer Interfacing · NIPS 2005
Wearable and physiological sensing › electroencephalography
EEG feature fusion
0.012002
Combining Features for BCI · NIPS 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral filtering · 0.1spatial filtering · 0.1discriminative filter optimization · 0.1simultaneous diagonalization · 0.0common spatial patterns · 0.0single-trial classification · 0.0feature combination · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 From outliers to prototypes: Ordering data
Stefan Harmeling, Guido Dornhege, David M. J. Tax, Frank C. Meinecke, Klaus-Robert Müller
Neurocomputing2
2005 Optimizing spatio-temporal filters for improving Brain-Computer Interfacing
abstract
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems create a novel communication channel from the brain to an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. Therefore they could provide a new communication and control option for paralyzed patients. Modern BCI technology is essentially based on techniques for the clas- sification of single-trial brain signals. Here we present a novel technique that allows the simultaneous optimization of a spatial and a spectral filter enhancing discriminability of multi-channel EEG single-trials. The eval- uation of 60 experiments involving 22 different subjects demonstrates the superiority of the proposed algorithm. Apart from the enhanced clas- sification, the spatial and/or the spectral filter that are determined by the algorithm can also be used for further analysis of the data, e.g., for source localization of the respective brain rhythms.
Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Matthias Krauledat, Florian Losch, Gabriel Curio, Klaus-Robert Müller
NIPS1
2003 Increase Information Transfer Rates in BCI by CSP Extension to Multi-class
abstract
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) are an interesting emerging technology that is driven by the motivation to develop an effective communication in- terface translating human intentions into a control signal for devices like computers or neuroprostheses. If this can be done bypassing the usual hu- man output pathways like peripheral nerves and muscles it can ultimately become a valuable tool for paralyzed patients. Most activity in BCI re- search is devoted to finding suitable features and algorithms to increase information transfer rates (ITRs). The present paper studies the implica- tions of using more classes, e.g., left vs. right hand vs. foot, for operating a BCI. We contribute by (1) a theoretical study showing under some mild assumptions that it is practically not useful to employ more than three or four classes, (2) two extensions of the common spatial pattern (CSP) algorithm, one interestingly based on simultaneous diagonalization, and (3) controlled EEG experiments that underline our theoretical findings and show excellent improved ITRs.
Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, Klaus-Robert Müller
NIPS1
2002 Single Trial Detection of EEG Error Potentials: A Tool for Increasing BCI Transmission Rates
Benjamin Blankertz, Christin Schäfer, Guido Dornhege, Gabriel Curio
ICANN3
2002 Combining Features for BCI
abstract
Recently, interest is growing to develop an effective communication in- terface connecting the human brain to a computer, the ’Brain-Computer Interface’ (BCI). One motivation of BCI research is to provide a new communication channel substituting normal motor output in patients with severe neuromuscular disabilities. In the last decade, various neuro- physiological cortical processes, such as slow potential shifts, movement related potentials (MRPs) or event-related desynchronization (ERD) of spontaneous EEG rhythms, were shown to be suitable for BCI, and, con- sequently, different independent approaches of extracting BCI-relevant EEG-features for single-trial analysis are under investigation. Here, we present and systematically compare several concepts for combining such EEG-features to improve the single-trial classification. Feature combi- nations are evaluated on movement imagination experiments with 3 sub- jects where EEG-features are based on either MRPs or ERD, or both. Those combination methods that incorporate the assumption that the sin- gle EEG-features are physiologically mutually independent outperform the plain method of ’adding’ evidence where the single-feature vectors are simply concatenated. These results strengthen the hypothesis that MRP and ERD reflect at least partially independent aspects of cortical processes and open a new perspective to boost BCI effectiveness.
Guido Dornhege, Benjamin Blankertz, Gabriel Curio, Klaus-Robert Müller
NIPS1