Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gianfranco Visentin

dblp:80/5158 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 93% Robot manipulation · 4% Motion planning and robot control · 2%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
global localization
0.212015
Towards orbital based global rover localization · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.212015
Towards orbital based global rover localization · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual odometry
visual-inertial odometry
0.212015
Towards orbital based global rover localization · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry
0.212015
Towards orbital based global rover localization · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
autonomous grasping
0.011998
Space Robot Autonomy Based on Distance Sensors · ICRA 1998
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.011998
Space Robot Autonomy Based on Distance Sensors · ICRA 1998
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011998
Space Robot Autonomy Based on Distance Sensors · ICRA 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ROI extraction · 0.2DARCES matching · 0.2laser distance sensor · 0.0hierarchical control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Global Localization for Future Space Exploration Rovers
Evangelos Boukas, Athanasios S. Polydoros, Gianfranco Visentin, Lazaros Nalpantidis, Antonios Gasteratos
ICVS3
2015 Towards orbital based global rover localization
abstract
Space exploratory rovers do well in autonomous or composite semi-autonomous exploration of extraterrestrial surfaces, yet their localization relies on the particular spot they had landed, rather than being universal, i.e. based on the absolute coordinate system of the explored planet. The idea underlaying the work presented in this paper is the transition from the relative to absolute localization by inspecting common Regions of Interest (ROIs) on both rover and orbital imagery. In order to achieve that we propose a method comprising an offline and an onboard procedure. Particularly, prior to the mission the orbital images of the intended landing area are examined to extract ROIs and to construct an offline Global Network (GN). The onboard procedure is based on the rover's self localization which is performed via an inertial aided visual odometry (VO). During its roaming the rover extracts ROIs from the ground and forms a Local Network (LN). The last is iteratively matched with the GN by a specifically designed matching procedure based on Data-Aligned Rigidity-Constrained Exhaustive Search (DARCES). The proposed method is tested on real representative data collected during the ESA Seeker activity. The results indicate that the self-localization of a planetary rover in an absolute frame of reference is feasible, provided that the area includes few discriminative ROIs.
Evangelos Boukas, Antonios Gasteratos, Gianfranco Visentin
ICRA3
1998 Space Robot Autonomy Based on Distance Sensors
abstract
Describes work on a large laboratory testbed for space robotics (Columbus Automation and Robotics Laboratory Testbed), able to execute hierarchically organized complex activities, to increase the degree of autonomy of the system. For instance, now the robotic system is able to conclude several activities, like closing a drawer or moving a sample from a location to another, without any intervention of the operator even when the subject to be manipulated is out of its locking place or is far from the expected (nominal) position of several centimetres. A set of laser distance sensors available in the end-effector has been exploited to this purpose, and suitable strategies have been developed to recover the true grasping positions. The work has been developed following a standard control development methodology which has led to the full modular integration of the additional autonomous control capabilities in the basic robot control and programming system.
P. Bizzantino, M. De Bartolomei, GianAntonio Magnani, Gianfranco Visentin
ICRA4