Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William E. Burr

dblp:80/727 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 77% Network performance modeling · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › metropolitan area network
metropolitan area network protocol
0.011994
A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994
Network performance modeling › network simulation
discrete-event simulation
0.011994
A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

discrete-event simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 A comparison of FDDI asynchronous mode and DQDB queue arbitrated mode data transmission for metropolitan area network applications
abstract
The performance of the FDDI token ring and IEEE 802.6 DQDB protocols are compared using discrete event simulation models. A metropolitan area network (MAN) of 100 km and with 50 stations was modeled. A 100 Mbps channel is used for both networks with a traffic model with large (1 kbyte) low priority packets and smaller (100 byte) high priority packets. The delay and fairness characteristics of both networks are analyzed. The simulations show that FDDI has advantages in fairness and maximum capacity, while DQDB offers lower delay at all except very heavy loads and has a stronger priority mechanism.>
William E. Burr, Shukri Wakid, Xiaomei Qian, Dhadesugoor Vaman
IEEE Trans. Commun.1