Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giuseppe Tortora

dblp:80/8366 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-4865-310XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 80% Legged, aerial and field robots · 18% Motion planning and robot control · 2%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
soft robotics
0.412020
Pressure-Driven Manipulator with Variable Stiffness Structure · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
variable stiffness manipulator
0.412020
Pressure-Driven Manipulator with Variable Stiffness Structure · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuation
magnetic actuation
0.222011
A Novel Magnetic Actuation System for Miniature Swimming Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2011
Design of an autonomous swimming miniature robot based on a novel concept of magnetic actuation · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
swimming robot
0.112011
A Novel Magnetic Actuation System for Miniature Swimming Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2011
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
mobile robot locomotion
0.112010
Design of an autonomous swimming miniature robot based on a novel concept of magnetic actuation · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics
0.012010
Design of an autonomous swimming miniature robot based on a novel concept of magnetic actuation · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stiffness control · 0.4pneumatic actuation · 0.4multiphysics dynamic modeling · 0.1magnetic dragging · 0.1prototyping · 0.1analytical modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Pressure-Driven Manipulator with Variable Stiffness Structure
abstract
The high deformability and compliance of soft robots allow safer interaction with the environment. On the other hand, these advantages bring along controllability and predictability challenges which result in loss of force and stiffness output. Such challenges should be addressed in order to improve the overall functional performance and to meet the requirements of real-scenario applications. In this paper, we present a bidirectional in-plane manipulator which consists of two unidirectional fiber-reinforced actuators (FRAs) and a hybrid soft-rigid stiffness control structure (SCS), all of them controlled by air pressure. Both controllability and predictability of the manipulator are enhanced by the hybrid soft-rigid structure. While the FRAs provide positioning and position dependent stiffness, the SCS increases the stiffness of the manipulator without position dependency. The SCS is able to increase the manipulator stiffness by 35%, 30%, and 18%, when one FRA is pressurized at 150 kPa, 75 kPa, and 0 kPa, respectively. Experiments are carried out to present the feasibility of the proposed manipulator.
Canberk Sozer, Linda Paternò, Giuseppe Tortora, Arianna Menciassi
ICRA3
2011 A Novel Magnetic Actuation System for Miniature Swimming Robots
abstract
A novel mechanism for actuating a miniature swimming robot is described, modeled, and experimentally validated. Underwater propulsion is obtained through the interaction of mobile internal permanent magnets that move a number of polymeric flaps arranged around the body of the robot. Due to the flexibility of the proposed swimming mechanism, a different range of performances can be obtained by varying the design features. A simple multiphysics dynamic model was developed in order to predict basic behavior in fluids for different structural parameters of the robot. In order to experimentally verify the proposed mechanism and to validate the model, a prototype of the swimming robot was fabricated. The device is 35 mm in length and 18 mm in width and thickness, and the forward motion is provided by four flaps with an active length of 20 mm. The model was able to correctly predict flap dynamics, thrust, and energy expenditure for magnetic dragging within a spindle-frequency range going from 2 to 5 Hz. Additionally, the model was used to infer robot-thrust variation related to different spindle frequencies and a 25% increase in flap active length. Concerning swimming performance, the proposed technical implementation of the concept was able to achieve 37 mm/s with 4.9% magnetic mechanism efficiency.
Pietro Valdastri, Edoardo Sinibaldi, Sebastiano Caccavaro, Giuseppe Tortora, Arianna Menciassi, Paolo Dario
IEEE Trans. Robotics4
2010 Design of an autonomous swimming miniature robot based on a novel concept of magnetic actuation
abstract
In this work, we propose a new concept for locomotion of a miniature jellyfish-like robot based on the interaction of mobile permanent magnets. The robot is 35 mm in length and 15 mm in width, and it incorporates a rotary actuator, a magnetic rotor, several elastic magnetic tails and a polymeric body embedding a wireless microcontroller and power supply. The novel magnetic mechanism is very versatile for numerous applications and can be tailored and adapted on the basis of different specifications. An analytical model of the magnetic mechanism allows to shape the robot design based on the specific application. The working principle of the robot together with the design, prototyping and testing phases are illustrated in this paper.
Giuseppe Tortora, Sebastiano Caccavaro, Pietro Valdastri, Arianna Menciassi, Paolo Dario
ICRA1