Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jacques J. M. van Dongen

dblp:81/3579 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0002-3650-7087ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112006
Maximum significance clustering of oligonucleotide microarrays · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probe-level statistics · 0.1maximum significance clustering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Maximum significance clustering of oligonucleotide microarrays
abstract
MOTIVATION: Affymetrix high-density oligonucleotide microarrays measure the expression of DNA transcripts using probesets, i.e. multiple probes per transcript. Usually, these multiple measurements are transformed into a single probeset expression level before data analysis proceeds; any information on variability is lost. In this paper we demonstrate how individual probe measurements can be used in a statistic for differential expression. Furthermore, we show how this statistic can serve as a criterion for clustering microarrays. RESULTS: A novel clustering algorithm using this maximum significance criterion is demonstrated to be more efficient with the measured data than competing techniques for dealing with repeated measurements, especially when the sample size is small.
Dick de Ridder, Frank J. T. Staal, Jacques J. M. van Dongen, Marcel J. T. Reinders
Bioinform.3