Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Yael Nemeth

dblp:81/6235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
evaluation		 0.012004
Evaluation of the real and perceived value of automatic and interactive query expansion · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval › query reformulation › query expansion
interactive query expansion		 0.012004
Evaluation of the real and perceived value of automatic and interactive query expansion · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query expansion		 0.012004
Evaluation of the real and perceived value of automatic and interactive query expansion · SIGIR 2004
Information retrieval › evaluation
user study		 0.012004
Evaluation of the real and perceived value of automatic and interactive query expansion · SIGIR 2004
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Evaluation of the real and perceived value of automatic and interactive query expansion
abstract
The paper describes a user study examining methods for improving users queries, specifically interactive and automatic query expansion and advanced search options. The user study includes subjective and objective evaluation of the effect of the above methods and a comparison between the real and perceived effect.
Yael Nemeth, Bracha Shapira, Meirav Taieb-Maimon
 SIGIR1