Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nishadi De Silva
dblp:81/6683
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4802-2375ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
antimicrobial resistance gene detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assemblies · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assemblies · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
prokaryotic genome annotation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assemblies · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics › metagenome-assembled genome
metagenome-assembled genome analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assemblies · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assemblies · Bioinform. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nextflow pipeline · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | mettannotator: a comprehensive and scalable Nextflow annotation pipeline for prokaryotic assembliesabstractSUMMARY: In recent years, there has been a surge in prokaryotic genome assemblies, coming from both isolated organisms and environmental samples. These assemblies often include novel species that are poorly represented in reference databases creating a need for a tool that can annotate both well-described and novel taxa, and can run at scale. Here, we present mettannotator-a comprehensive, scalable Nextflow pipeline for prokaryotic genome annotation that identifies coding and noncoding regions, predicts protein functions, including antimicrobial resistance, and delineates gene clusters. The pipeline summarizes these results in a GFF (General Feature Format) file that can be easily utilized in downstream analysis or visualized using common genome browsers. Here, we show how it works on 200 genomes from 29 prokaryotic phyla, including isolate genomes and known and novel metagenome-assembled genomes, and present metrics on its performance in comparison to other tools. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The pipeline is written in Nextflow and Python and published under an open source Apache 2.0 licence. Instructions and source code can be accessed at https://github.com/EBI-Metagenomics/mettannotator. The pipeline is also available on WorkflowHub: https://workflowhub.eu/workflows/1069. Tatiana A. Gurbich, Martin Beracochea, Nishadi De Silva, Robert D. Finn |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2008 | System Architecture Induces Document Architecture
Peter Henderson 0001, Nishadi De Silva |
SEKE | 2 |
| 2007 | SemCW: Semantic collaborative writing using RSTabstractDuring collaborative writing each author works on a copy of the shared document. These copies are then merged to produce the final document. This asynchronous work is supported by several collaborative writing tools. While these tools are excellent at merging and detecting syntactic conflicts, they are not able to easily recognise semantic inconsistencies. This hinders the coherence of the document because while each individual copy might be well constructed, they may not be after the merge. To address this, we investigate the combination of the Rhetorical Structure Theory with Operational Transformation approach. In this paper, we define a data model, a set of operations to manipulate the RST structures and a set of transformation functions. A validity checker alerts the authors to areas in the text with possible semantic lapses in the merged documents. Charbel Rahhal, Hala Skaf-Molli, Pascal Molli, Nishadi De Silva |
CollaborateCom | 4 |