Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cristiane M. Sato

dblp:81/9886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-1948-2957ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 58% Mathematical optimization · 17% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph sparsification
0.212016
Sparse Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.212016
Sparse Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph sparsification
spectral sparsification
0.212016
Sparse Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2016
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters
arboricity
0.212014
Arboricity and spanning-tree packing in random graphs with an application to load balancing · SODA 2014
Algorithms and data structures
load balancing
0.212014
Arboricity and spanning-tree packing in random graphs with an application to load balancing · SODA 2014
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › probabilistic combinatorics
random graph theory
0.212014
Arboricity and spanning-tree packing in random graphs with an application to load balancing · SODA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rank-one approximation · 0.2pessimistic estimators · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Packing Arborescences in Random Digraphs
Carlos Hoppen, Roberto F. Parente, Cristiane M. Sato
SIAM J. Discret. Math.3
2016 Sparse Sums of Positive Semidefinite Matrices
abstract
Many fast graph algorithms begin by preprocessing the graph to improve its sparsity. A common form of this is spectral sparsification, which involves removing and reweighting the edges of the graph while approximately preserving its spectral properties. This task has a more general linear algebraic formulation in terms of approximating sums of rank-one matrices. This article considers a more general task of approximating sums of symmetric, positive semidefinite matrices of arbitrary rank. We present two deterministic, polynomial time algorithms for solving this problem. The first algorithm applies the pessimistic estimators of Wigderson and Xiao, and the second involves an extension of the method of Batson, Spielman, and Srivastava. These algorithms have several applications, including sparsifiers of hypergraphs, sparse solutions to semidefinite programs, sparsifiers of unique games, and graph sparsifiers with various auxiliary constraints.
Marcel Kenji de Carli Silva, Nicholas J. A. Harvey, Cristiane M. Sato
ACM Trans. Algorithms3
2014 Arboricity and spanning-tree packing in random graphs with an application to load balancing
abstract
We study the arboricity A and the maximum number T of edge-disjoint spanning trees of the classical random graph (n, p). For all p(n) ∊ [0,1], we show that, with high probability T is precisely the minimum between δ and ⌊m/(n – 1)⌋, where δ is the smallest degree of the graph and m denotes the number of edges. Moreover, we explicitly determine a sharp threshold value for p such that: above this threshold, T equals ⌊m/(n – 1)⌋ and A equals ⌈m/(n – 1)⌉; and below this threshold, T equals δ, and we give a two-value concentration result for the arboricity A in that range. Finally, we include a stronger version of these results in the context of the random graph process where the edges are sequentially added one by one. A direct application of our result gives a sharp threshold for the maximum load being at most k in the two-choice load balancing problem, where k → ∞.
Pu Gao, Xavier Pérez-Giménez, Cristiane M. Sato
SODA3