Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

S. Rajasekharan

dblp:82/4049 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 61% Motion planning and robot control · 30% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 9%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
demining robot
0.012003
The current opinion on the use of rohots for landmine detection · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.012003
The current opinion on the use of rohots for landmine detection · ICRA 2003
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012003
Multiple manipulator control from a human motor-control perspective · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › intelligent control
fuzzy control
0.012003
Multiple manipulator control from a human motor-control perspective · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2003
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor fusion
0.012003
The current opinion on the use of rohots for landmine detection · ICRA 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor fusion · 0.1lyapunov stability · 0.0linear matrix inequality · 0.0decomposable models · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 The current opinion on the use of rohots for landmine detection
abstract
Anti-Personal landmines are a significant barrier to economic and social development in a number of countries. Several sensors have been developed but each one will probably have to find, if it exists, a specific area of applicability, determined by technological as well as economical or even social factors, and possibly other sensors to work with using some form of sensor fusion. A significant issue concerns the safety of the deminer. For every 5000 mines removed, one deminer is killed. The design of an accurate sensor may reduce the amount of time needed to determine whether a landmine exists, but does not increase the safety of the deminer. Since the safety issues during the eradication process are of great concern, the use and integration of cheap and simple robots and sensors in humanitarian demining has been raised. This removes the deminer from close contact with mines. This paper is concerned mainly with the work that has been done in the area of robotics and landmine detection, the problems involved, the issues that have been overlooked and the future of robots in the field.
S. Rajasekharan, Chandra Kambhampati
ICRA1
2003 Multiple manipulator control from a human motor-control perspective
abstract
The human motor-control system has a hierarchical and decentralized structure, and building such a control system for a multiple robot system would require a decomposed model. The difficulty in decomposing complex robotic systems is due to interactions between robots, and the paper proposes a control architecture that controls the manipulator joints and interactions separately. A decomposable model for an N - n degrees-of-freedom multimanipulator/object system handling an object is derived. This model is then used to design a Lyapunov-based fuzzy logic controller for the system by solving linear matrix equalities. It is shown that this controller is closed-loop stable and a stable suboptimal controller for the system may be designed using bounds.
Chandra Kambhampati, S. Rajasekharan
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2
2002 A rough set solution to a fuzzy set problem
abstract
When designing a Takagi-Sugeno (TS) fuzzy controller, reducing the number of rules makes it easier to derive a stable Lyapunov based controller using linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). The paper describes an intuitive way of reducing a fuzzy ruleset by eliminating rules that are very similar in terms of parameters and membership functions. It is then suggested that a more formal approach to this intuitive idea may be found in rough set theory.
Charlotte Bean, Chandra Kambhampati, S. Rajasekharan
FUZZ-IEEE3
2001 Modelling multiple robot manipulators handling a common object: a human motor control perspective
abstract
This paper describes the aspects involved in modelling a multi-robotic system from a human motor control perspective. Building a control system for a multi-robot system that works in a similar fashion to the human motor control system would require a decomposable model. Decomposition of a complex robotic system is difficult due to the interactions between the subsystems. The proposed method of separating the interconnections is applied with the aid of fuzzy modelling to derive a fully decomposable model of two manipulator robots handling a common object.
Chandra Kambhampati, S. Rajasekharan
SMC2