Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nina V. Fedoroff

dblp:82/4634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0002-9028-1701ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.122004
A tool-kit for cDNA microarray and promoter analysis · Bioinform. 2003
CLENCH: a program for calculating Cluster ENriCHment using the Gene Ontology · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics
0.012004
CLENCH: a program for calculating Cluster ENriCHment using the Gene Ontology · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
gene ontology analysis
0.012004
CLENCH: a program for calculating Cluster ENriCHment using the Gene Ontology · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray data normalization
0.012003
A tool-kit for cDNA microarray and promoter analysis · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
promoter analysis
0.012003
A tool-kit for cDNA microarray and promoter analysis · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › transcription factor binding site prediction
transcription factor binding site analysis
0.012003
A tool-kit for cDNA microarray and promoter analysis · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

GO annotation retrieval · 0.0data standardization · 0.0EST mapping · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A case study in pathway knowledgebase verification
abstract
BACKGROUND: Biological databases and pathway knowledge-bases are proliferating rapidly. We are developing software tools for computer-aided hypothesis design and evaluation, and we would like our tools to take advantage of the information stored in these repositories. But before we can reliably use a pathway knowledge-base as a data source, we need to proofread it to ensure that it can fully support computer-aided information integration and inference. RESULTS: We design a series of logical tests to detect potential problems we might encounter using a particular knowledge-base, the Reactome database, with a particular computer-aided hypothesis evaluation tool, HyBrow. We develop an explicit formal language from the language implicit in the Reactome data format and specify a logic to evaluate models expressed using this language. We use the formalism of finite model theory in this work. We then use this logic to formulate tests for desirable properties (such as completeness, consistency, and well-formedness) for pathways stored in Reactome. We apply these tests to the publicly available Reactome releases (releases 10 through 14) and compare the results, which highlight Reactome's steady improvement in terms of decreasing inconsistencies. We also investigate and discuss Reactome's potential for supporting computer-aided inference tools. CONCLUSION: The case study described in this work demonstrates that it is possible to use our model theory based approach to identify problems one might encounter using a knowledge-base to support hypothesis evaluation tools. The methodology we use is general and is in no way restricted to the specific knowledge-base employed in this case study. Future application of this methodology will enable us to compare pathway resources with respect to the generic properties such resources will need to possess if they are to support automated reasoning.
Stephen A. Racunas, Nigam H. Shah, Nina V. Fedoroff
BMC Bioinform.3
2004 CLENCH: a program for calculating Cluster ENriCHment using the Gene Ontology
abstract
SUMMARY: Analysis of microarray data most often produces lists of genes with similar expression patterns, which are then subdivided into functional categories for biological interpretation. Such functional categorization is most commonly accomplished using Gene Ontology (GO) categories. Although there are several programs that identify and analyze functional categories for human, mouse and yeast genes, none of them accept Arabidopsis thaliana data. In order to address this need for A.thaliana community, we have developed a program that retrieves GO annotations for A.thaliana genes and performs functional category analysis for lists of genes selected by the user. AVAILABILITY: http://www.personal.psu.edu/nhs109/Clench
Nigam H. Shah, Nina V. Fedoroff
Bioinform.2
2003 A tool-kit for cDNA microarray and promoter analysis
abstract
We describe two sets of programs for expediting routine tasks in analysis of cDNA microarray data and promoter sequences. The first set permits bad data points to be flagged with respect to a number of parameters and performs normalization in three different ways. It allows combining of result files into comprehensive data sets, evaluation of the quality of both technical and biological replicates and row and/or column standardization of data matrices. The second set supports mapping ESTs in the genome, identifying the corresponding genes and recovering their promoters, analyzing promoters for transcription factor binding sites, and visual representation of the results. The programs are designed primarily for Arabidopsis thaliana researchers, but can be adapted readily for other model systems. Availability and Supplementary information: http://www.personal.psu.edu/nhs109/Programs/
Nigam H. Shah, D. C. King, P. N. Shah, Nina V. Fedoroff
Bioinform.4