Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aditya Garg

dblp:82/6786 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 44% Vision and language · 34% Motion planning and robot control · 22%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
advertisement understanding
0.712023
Persuasion Strategies in Advertisements · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › world model
learned dynamics models
0.412020
A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models · ICRA 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.412020
A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models · ICRA 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.412020
A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models · ICRA 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-task attention fusion · 1.3image segmentation · 1.3model-based reinforcement learning · 0.4dynamics learning · 0.4benchmarking · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 FedDNA: Behavioural based approach for byzantine defense in federated learning via model fingerprinting and adaptive thresholding
Aditya Garg, Naman Bansal, Sumit Yadav, Nisha Kandhoul, Sanjay K. Dhurandher, Isaac Woungang
J. Inf. Secur. Appl.1
2023 Persuasion Strategies in Advertisements
abstract
Modeling what makes an advertisement persuasive, i.e., eliciting the desired response from consumer, is critical to the study of propaganda, social psychology, and marketing. Despite its importance, computational modeling of persuasion in computer vision is still in its infancy, primarily due to the lack of benchmark datasets that can provide persuasion-strategy labels associated with ads. Motivated by persuasion literature in social psychology and marketing, we introduce an extensive vocabulary of persuasion strategies and build the first ad image corpus annotated with persuasion strategies. We then formulate the task of persuasion strategy prediction with multi-modal learning, where we design a multi-task attention fusion model that can leverage other ad-understanding tasks to predict persuasion strategies. The dataset also provides image segmentation masks, which labels persuasion strategies in the corresponding ad images on the test split. We publicly release our code and dataset at https://midas-research.github.io/persuasion-advertisements/.
Yaman Singla, Rajat Jha, Arunim Gupta, Milan Aggarwal, Aditya Garg, Tushar Malyan, Ayush Bhardwaj, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Balaji Krishnamurthy, Changyou Chen
AAAI5
2020 A Real-Robot Dataset for Assessing Transferability of Learned Dynamics Models
abstract
In the context of model-based reinforcement learning and control, a large number of methods for learning system dynamics have been proposed in recent years. The purpose of these learned models is to synthesize new control policies. An important open question is how robust current dynamics-learning methods are to shifts in the data distribution due to changes in the control policy. We present a real-robot dataset which allows to systematically investigate this question. This dataset contains trajectories of a 3 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) robot being controlled by a diverse set of policies. For comparison, we also provide a simulated version of the dataset. Finally, we benchmark a few widely-used dynamics-learning methods using the proposed dataset. Our results show that the iid test error of a learned model is not necessarily a good indicator of its accuracy under control policies different from the one which generated the training data. This suggests that it may be important to evaluate dynamics-learning methods in terms of their transfer performance, rather than only their iid error.
Diego Agudelo-España, Andrii Zadaianchuk, Philippe Wenk, Aditya Garg, Joel Akpo, Felix Grimminger, Julian Viereck, Maximilien Naveau, Ludovic Righetti, Georg Martius, Andreas Krause 0001, Bernhard Schölkopf, Stefan Bauer, Manuel Wüthrich
ICRA4
2006 Interface descriptions for enterprise architecture
Aditya Garg, Rick Kazman, Hong-Mei Chen
Sci. Comput. Program.1
2005 BITAM: An engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures
Hong-Mei Chen, Rick Kazman, Aditya Garg
Sci. Comput. Program.3