Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pei-Yun Hsueh

dblp:82/7823 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-0737-4983ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › dialogue analysis
dialogue segmentation
0.112007
Combining Multiple Knowledge Sources for Dialogue Segmentation in Multimedia Archives · ACL 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.112007
Combining Multiple Knowledge Sources for Dialogue Segmentation in Multimedia Archives · ACL 2007
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
multimedia archives
0.012007
Combining Multiple Knowledge Sources for Dialogue Segmentation in Multimedia Archives · ACL 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge source combination · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Who is the expert? Analyzing gaze data to predict expertise level in collaborative applications
abstract
In this paper, we analyze complex gaze tracking data in a collaborative task and apply machine learning models to automatically predict skill-level differences between participants. Specifically, we present findings that address the two primary challenges for this prediction task: (1) extracting meaningful features from the gaze information, and (2) casting the prediction task as a machine learning (ML) problem. The results show that our approach based on profile hidden Markov models are up to 96% accurate and can make the determination as fast as one minute into the collaboration, with only 5% of gaze observations registered. We also provide a qualitative analysis of gaze patterns that reveal the relative expertise level of the paired users in a collaborative learning user study.
Yan Liu 0002, Pei-Yun Hsueh, Jennifer Lai, Mirweis Sangin, Marc-Antoine Nüssli, Pierre Dillenbourg
ICME2
2009 Improving meeting summarization by focusing on user needs: a task-oriented evaluation
abstract
Advances in multimedia technologies have enabled the creation of huge archives of audio-video recordings of meetings, and there is burgeoning interest in developing meeting browsers to help users better leverage these archives. A recent study has shown that extractive summaries provide a more efficient way of navigating meeting content than simply reading through the transcript and using the audio-video record, or navigating via keyword search (Murray, 2007). The extractive summary technique identifies informative dialogue acts to generate general purpose summaries. These summaries can still be lengthy. Recently, we have developed a decision-focused summarization system that presents only 1-2% of the recordings related to decision making. In this paper, we describe a task-based evaluation in which we compare the decision-focused summaries to the general purpose summaries. Our results indicate that the more focused summaries help users perform the decision debriefing task more effectively and improve perceived efficiency. In addition, this study also investigates the effect of automatic summaries and transcription on task effectiveness, report quality, and users' perceptions of task success.
Pei-Yun Hsueh, Johanna D. Moore
IUI1
2008 Audio-based unsupervised segmentation of multiparty dialogue
abstract
In this paper, we explore a novel way to leverage audio information for unsupervised segmentation of multiparty dialogue. Our system which segments directly on patterns derived from audio sources is evaluated with previous work that segments on lexical patterns found in transcripts. We examine the effectiveness of both systems on recovering a two-layer structure of meeting dialogue. We demonstrate that the audio-based system performs significantly better than the word-based system on this task. In particular, it effectively recover segments of off-topic discussion. Results are encouraging as the audio information used in the system can be obtained in near real time and with absence of manual and ASR transcripts. It is particularly desirable when a system has to be operated online, or in unfamiliar domains and languages.
Pei-Yun Hsueh
ICASSP1
2007 Combining Multiple Knowledge Sources for Dialogue Segmentation in Multimedia Archives
Pei-Yun Hsueh, Johanna D. Moore
ACL1
2007 What Decisions Have You Made?: Automatic Decision Detection in Meeting Conversations
Pei-Yun Hsueh, Johanna D. Moore
HLT-NAACL1
2006 Automatic Segmentation of Multiparty Dialogue
Pei-Yun Hsueh, Johanna D. Moore, Steve Renals
EACL1
2006 Automatic Topic Segmentation and Labeling in Multiparty Dialogue
abstract
This study concerns how to segment a scenario-driven multiparty dialogue and how to label these segments automatically. We apply approaches that have been proposed for identifying topic boundaries at a coarser level to the problem of identifying agenda-based topic boundaries in scenario-based meetings. We also develop conditional models to classify segments into topic classes. Experiments in topic segmentation show that a supervised classification approach that combines lexical and conversational features outperforms the unsupervised lexical chain-based approach, achieving 20% and 12% improvement on segmentating top-level and sub-topic segments respectively. Experiments in topic classification suggest that it is possible to automatically categorize segments into appropriate topic classes given only the transcripts. Training with features selected using the Log Likelihood ratio improves the results by 13.3%.
Pei-Yun Hsueh, Johanna D. Moore
SLT1