Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Radim Nedbal

dblp:83/4160 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0001-7727-8092ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics › multimedia forensics
image forensics
0.212013
Blind Verification of Digital Image Originality: A Statistical Approach · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2013
Digital forensics and information hiding
acquisition device identification
0.012013
Blind Verification of Digital Image Originality: A Statistical Approach · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.2JPEG header analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Blind Verification of Digital Image Originality: A Statistical Approach
abstract
Many methods for verifying the integrity of digital images employ various fingerprints associated with acquisition devices. Data on an acquisition device and fingerprints are extracted from an image and confronted with a reference data set that includes all possible fingerprints of the acquisition device. This allows us to draw a conclusion whether the digital image has been modified or not. Thus it is critical to have a sufficiently large, reliable, and true reference data set, otherwise critical miscalculations can arise. Reference data sets are extracted from image data sets that in turn are collected from unknown and nonguaranteed environments (mostly from the Internet). Since often software modifications leave no obvious traces in the image file (e.g., in metadata), it is not easy to recognize original images, from which fingerprints of acquisition devices can be extracted to form true reference data sets. This is the problem addressed in this paper. Given a database consisting of “unguaranteed” images, we introduce a statistical approach for assessing image originality by using the image file's header information (e.g., JPEG compression parameters). First a general framework is introduced. Then the framework is applied to several fingerprint types selected for image integrity verification.
Babak Mahdian, Radim Nedbal, Stanislav Saic
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2008 Algebraic Optimization of Relational Queries with Various Kinds of Preferences
Radim Nedbal
SOFSEM1