Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Konstantine Arkoudas
dblp:83/5068
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
11as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3436-8922ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 25% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 75% Data models and query languages · 20% Query processing and optimization · 6% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Unfreeze with Care: Space-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Semantic Parsing Models · WWW 2022 Training Naturalized Semantic Parsers with Very Little Data · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
encoder pretraining |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systems · KDD 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
few-shot semantic parsing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Training Naturalized Semantic Parsers with Very Little Data · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systems · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unfreeze with Care: Space-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Semantic Parsing Models · WWW 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompt tuning
prefix tuning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unfreeze with Care: Space-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Semantic Parsing Models · WWW 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unfreeze with Care: Space-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Semantic Parsing Models · WWW 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systems · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-modal transfer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Exploring Transfer Learning For End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
multi-task transfer learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Exploring Transfer Learning For End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding · AAAI 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Exploring Transfer Learning For End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding · AAAI 2021 |
Data models and query languages
natural language interface |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › query suggestion
query auto-completion |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval
question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding |
0.3 | 2 | 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systems · KDD 2022 Exploring Transfer Learning For End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding · AAAI 2021 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
enterprise search |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Finding Money in the Haystack: Information Retrieval at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2015 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Finding Money in the Haystack: Information Retrieval at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2015 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
bias-term fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Unfreeze with Care: Space-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Semantic Parsing Models · WWW 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
intent detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systems · KDD 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
slot filling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding Systems · KDD 2022 |
Query processing and optimization
semantic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models
semantic representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2018 |
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
federated search |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Finding Money in the Haystack: Information Retrieval at Bloomberg · SIGIR 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
joint training · 1.1transfer learning · 0.6special token embeddings · 0.6self-training · 0.6prefix-tuning · 0.6paraphrasing · 0.6knowledge distillation · 0.6constrained decoding · 0.6bias-term tuning · 0.6multi-task learning · 0.5logical form · 0.3auto-completion · 0.3crowdsourcing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Low-Resource Compositional Semantic Parsing with Concept PretrainingabstractSubendhu Rongali, Mukund Sridhar, Haidar Khan, Konstantine Arkoudas, Wael Hamza, Andrew McCallum. Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023. Subendhu Rongali, Mukund Sridhar, Haidar Khan, Konstantine Arkoudas, Wael Hamza, Andrew McCallum |
EACL | 4 |
| 2022 | Training Naturalized Semantic Parsers with Very Little DataabstractSemantic parsing is an important NLP problem, particularly for voice assistants such as Alexa and Google Assistant. State-of-the-art (SOTA) semantic parsers are seq2seq architectures based on large language models that have been pretrained on vast amounts of text. To better leverage that pretraining, recent work has explored a reformulation of semantic parsing whereby the output sequences are themselves natural language sentences, but in a controlled fragment of natural language. This approach delivers strong results, particularly for few-shot semantic parsing, which is of key importance in practice and the focus of our paper. We push this line of work forward by introducing an automated methodology that delivers very significant additional improvements by utilizing modest amounts of unannotated data, which is typically easy to obtain. Our method is based on a novel synthesis of four techniques: joint training with auxiliary unsupervised tasks; constrained decoding; self-training; and paraphrasing. We show that this method delivers new SOTA few-shot performance on the Overnight dataset, particularly in very low-resource settings, and very compelling few-shot results on a new semantic parsing dataset. Subendhu Rongali, Konstantine Arkoudas, Melanie Rubino, Wael Hamza |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Alexa Teacher Model: Pretraining and Distilling Multi-Billion-Parameter Encoders for Natural Language Understanding SystemsabstractWe present results from a large-scale experiment on pretraining encoders with non-embedding parameter counts ranging from 700M to 9.3B, their subsequent distillation into smaller models ranging from 17M-170M parameters, and their application to the Natural Language Understanding (NLU) component of a virtual assistant system. Though we train using 70% spoken-form data, our teacher models perform comparably to XLM-R and mT5 when evaluated on the written-form Cross-lingual Natural Language Inference (XNLI) corpus. We perform a second stage of pretraining on our teacher models using in-domain data from our system, improving error rates by 3.86% relative for intent classification and 7.01% relative for slot filling. We find that even a 170M-parameter model distilled from our Stage 2 teacher model has 2.88% better intent classification and 7.69% better slot filling error rates when compared to the 2.3B-parameter teacher trained only on public data (Stage 1), emphasizing the importance of in-domain data for pretraining. When evaluated offline using labeled NLU data, our 17M-parameter Stage 2 distilled model outperforms both XLM-R Base (85M params) and DistillBERT (42M params) by 4.23% to 6.14%, respectively. Finally, we present results from a full virtual assistant experimentation platform, where we find that models trained using our pretraining and distillation pipeline outperform models distilled from 85M-parameter teachers by 3.74%-4.91% on an automatic measurement of full-system user dissatisfaction. Jack FitzGerald, Shankar Ananthakrishnan, Konstantine Arkoudas, Davide Bernardi, Abhishek Bhagia, Claudio Delli Bovi, Jin Cao 0003, Rakesh Chada, Amit Chauhan, Luoxin Chen, Anurag Dwarakanath, Satyam Dwivedi, Turan Gojayev, Karthik Gopalakrishnan 0001, Thomas Gueudré, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Wael Hamza, Jonathan J. Hüser, Kevin Martin Jose, Haidar Khan, Beiye Liu, Jianhua Lu, Alessandro Manzotti, Pradeep Natarajan, Karolina Owczarzak, Gokmen Oz, Enrico Palumbo, Charith Peris, Chandana Satya Prakash, Stephen Rawls, Andy Rosenbaum, Anjali Shenoy, Saleh Soltan, Mukund Sridhar, Lizhen Tan, Fabian Triefenbach, Pan Wei, Shuai Zheng 0004, Gökhan Tür, Premkumar Natarajan |
KDD | 3 |
| 2022 | Compositional Task-Oriented Parsing as Abstractive Question AnsweringabstractWenting Zhao, Konstantine Arkoudas, Weiqi Sun, Claire Cardie. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Konstantine Arkoudas, Claire Cardie |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2022 | Unfreeze with Care: Space-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Semantic Parsing ModelsabstractSemantic parsing is a key NLP task that maps natural language to structured meaning representations. As in many other NLP tasks, SOTA performance in semantic parsing is now attained by fine-tuning a large pretrained language model (PLM). While effective, this approach is inefficient in the presence of multiple downstream tasks, as a new set of values for all parameters of the PLM needs to be stored for each task separately. Recent work has explored methods for adapting PLMs to downstream tasks while keeping most (or all) of their parameters frozen. We examine two such promising techniques, prefix tuning and bias-term tuning, specifically on semantic parsing. We compare them against each other on two different semantic parsing datasets, and we also compare them against full and partial fine-tuning, both in few-shot and conventional data settings. While prefix tuning is shown to do poorly for semantic parsing tasks off the shelf, we modify it by adding special token embeddings, which results in very strong performance without compromising parameter savings. Haidar Khan, Nicolas Guenon des Mesnards, Melanie Rubino, Konstantine Arkoudas |
WWW | 5 |
| 2021 | Exploring Transfer Learning For End-to-End Spoken Language UnderstandingabstractVoice Assistants such as Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant typically use a two-stage Spoken Language Understanding pipeline; first, an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) component to process customer speech and generate text transcriptions, followed by a Natural Language Understanding (NLU) component to map transcriptions to an actionable hypothesis. An end-to-end (E2E) system that goes directly from speech to a hypothesis is a more attractive option. These systems were shown to be smaller, faster, and better optimized. However, they require massive amounts of end-to-end training data and in addition, don't take advantage of the already available ASR and NLU training data. In this work, we propose an E2E system that is designed to jointly train on multiple speech-to-text tasks, such as ASR (speech-transcription) and SLU (speech-hypothesis), and text-to-text tasks, such as NLU (text-hypothesis). We call this the Audio-Text All-Task (AT-AT) Model and we show that it beats the performance of E2E models trained on individual tasks, especially ones trained on limited data. We show this result on an internal music dataset and two public datasets, FluentSpeech and SNIPS Audio, where we achieve state-of-the-art results. Since our model can process both speech and text input sequences and learn to predict a target sequence, it also allows us to do zero-shot E2E SLU by training on only text-hypothesis data (without any speech) from a new domain. We evaluate this ability of our model on the Facebook TOP dataset and set a new benchmark for zeroshot E2E performance. We release the audio data collected for the TOP dataset for future research. Subendhu Rongali, Beiye Liu, Liwei Cai, Konstantine Arkoudas, Chengwei Su, Wael Hamza |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2019 | Semantically Driven Auto-completionabstractThe Bloomberg Terminal has been a leading source of financial data and analytics for over 30 years. Through its thousands of functions, the Terminal allows its users to query and run analytics over a large array of data sources, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data; as well as plot charts, set up event-driven alerts and triggers, create interactive maps, exchange information via email and instant messaging, and so on. To improve user experience, we have been building question answering systems that can understand a wide range of natural language constructs for various domains that are of fundamental interest to our users. Such natural language interfaces, while exceedingly helpful to users, introduce a number of usability challenges of their own. We tackle some of these challenges through auto-completion. A distinguishing mark of our auto-complete systems is that they are based on and guided by corresponding semantic parsing systems. We describe the auto-complete problem as it arises in this setting, the novel algorithms that we use to solve it, and report on the quality of the results and the efficiency of our approach. Konstantine Arkoudas, Mohamed Yahya 0001 |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2018 | Auto-completion for Question Answering Systems at BloombergabstractThe Bloomberg Terminal is the leading source of information and news in the finance industry. Through hundreds of functions that provide access to a vast wealth of structured and semi-structured data, the terminal is able to satisfy a wide range of information needs. Users can find what they need by constructing queries, plotting charts, creating alerts, and so on. Until recently, most queries to the terminal were constructed through dedicated GUIs. For instance, if users wanted to screen for technology companies that met certain criteria, they would specify the criteria by filling out a form via a sequence of interactions with GUI elements such as drop-down lists, checkboxes, radio and toggle buttons, etc. To facilitate information retrieval in the terminal, we are equipping it with the ability to understand and answer queries expressed in natural language. Our QA (question answering) systems map structurally complex questions like the above to a logical meaning representation which can then be translated to an executable query language (such as SQL or SPARQL). At that point we can execute the queries against a suitable back end, obtain the results, and present them to the users. Adding a natural-language interface to a data repository introduces usability challenges of its own, chief amongst them being this: How can the user know what the system can and cannot understand and answer (without needing to undergo extensive training)? We can unpack this question into two separate parts: 1) How can we convey the full range of the system's abilities? 2) How can we convey its limitations? We use auto-complete as a tool to help meet both challenges. Specifically, the first question pertains to the general issue of discoverability: We want at least some of the suggested completions to act as vehicles for discovering data and functionality of which users may have not been previously aware. The second question pertains to expectation management. Naturally, no QA system can attain perfect performance; limiting factors include representational shortcomings and various kinds of incompleteness of the underlying data sources, as well as NLP technology limitations. We want to stop generating completions as a signal indicating that we are not able to understand and/or answer what is being typed. Konstantine Arkoudas, Mohamed Yahya 0001 |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2015 | Finding Money in the Haystack: Information Retrieval at BloombergabstractThe financial markets are a rich domain for search, and it is not simple to serving the entire scope of financial professionals, who make their living on accurate, timely, and deep information. The data sources are many and disparate. This includes domains with rich structured data such as company and security attributes, textual data like research reports, and time sensitive news stories. Not only is the domain complicated, but some of the techniques that work for web search have to be adapted and reconsidered in an enterprise context with fewer eyeballs but just as complicated questions. At Bloomberg, we have been addressing these problems over the past four years in the search and discoverability group, heavily leveraging the insights from the academic and open-source communities to apply to our problems. We'll discuss about our efforts in Natural Language Question & Answer (NLQA), learning to rank, federated search, crowd sourcing, and how this all comes together to make search effective for our users. Jonathan J. Dorando, Konstantine Arkoudas, Parth Vasa, Gary Kazantsev, Gideon Mann |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2014 | Sophisticated Access Control via SMT and Logical FrameworksabstractWe introduce a new methodology for formulating, analyzing, and applying access-control policies. Policies are expressed as formal theories in the SMT (satisfiability-modulo-theories) subset of typed first-order logic, and represented in a programmable logical framework, with each theory extending a core ontology of access control. We reduce both request evaluation and policy analysis to SMT solving, and provide experimental results demonstrating the practicality of these reductions. We also introduce a class of canonical requests and prove that such requests can be evaluated in linear time. In many application domains, access requests are either naturally canonical or can easily be put into canonical form. The resulting policy framework is more expressive than XACML and languages in the Datalog family, without compromising efficiency. Using the computational logic facilities of the framework, a wide range of sophisticated policy analyses (including consistency, coverage, observational equivalence, and change impact) receive succinct formulations whose correctness can be straightforwardly verified. The use of SMT solving allows us to efficiently analyze policies with complicated numeric (integer and real) constraints, a weak point of previous policy analysis systems. Further, by leveraging the programmability of the underlying logical framework, our system provides exceptionally flexible ways of resolving conflicts and composing policies. Specifically, we show that our system subsumes FIA (Fine-grained Integration Algebra), an algebra recently developed for the purpose of integrating complex policies. Konstantine Arkoudas, Ritu Chadha, C. Jason Chiang |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. | 1 |
| 2012 | A model-theoretic approach to data anonymity and inference controlabstractIn secure data management the inference problem occurs when data classified at a high security level becomes inferrible from data classified at lower levels. We present a model-theoretic approach to this problem that captures the epistemic state of the database user as a set of possible worlds or models. Privacy is enforced by requiring the existence of k > 1 models assigning distinct values to sensitive attributes, and implemented via model counting. We provide an algorithm mechanizing this process and show that it is sound and complete for a large class of queries. Konstantine Arkoudas, Akshay Vashist |
CODASPY | 1 |
| 2009 | Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Via 3-Valued Heterogeneous Logic
Konstantine Arkoudas, Selmer Bringsjord, Sangeet S. Khemlani |
KEOD | 1 |
| 2009 | Vivid: A framework for heterogeneous problem solving
Konstantine Arkoudas, Selmer Bringsjord |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2008 | Trusted Theorem Proving: A Case Study in SLD-Resolution
Konstantine Arkoudas, Olin Shivers |
ISoLA | 1 |
| 2008 | Toward Formalizing Common-Sense Psychology: An Analysis of the False-Belief Task
Konstantine Arkoudas, Selmer Bringsjord |
PRICAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Simplifying Proofs in Fitch-Style Natural Deduction Systems
Konstantine Arkoudas |
J. Autom. Reason. | 1 |
| 2004 | Specification, Abduction, and Proof
Konstantine Arkoudas |
ATVA | 1 |
| 2004 | Verifying a File System Implementation
Konstantine Arkoudas, Karen Zee, Viktor Kuncak, Martin C. Rinard |
ICFEM | 1 |
| 2004 | The modal argument for hypercomputing minds
Selmer Bringsjord, Konstantine Arkoudas |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |