Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

P. Van Hecke

dblp:83/5159 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Optical networks · 44% Internet of things and sensor networks · 44% Network optimization and economics · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Optical networks
optical network design
0.112006
Next Generation Optical Scientific Network · INFOCOM 2006
Internet of things and sensor networks › topology control
topology optimization
0.112006
Next Generation Optical Scientific Network · INFOCOM 2006
Network optimization and economics › network design
capacity planning
0.012006
Next Generation Optical Scientific Network · INFOCOM 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Next Generation Optical Scientific Network
abstract
Today, the Belgian research network GIGANET, managed by BELNET, consists of two star-shaped structures, centralized in Brussels, from where data transmission lines depart to national PoPs (point-of-presence), which are located all over the country. Local universities, colleges and other research institutions connect to their nearest PoP. Current capacity is way below predictions for the near future, thus the network needs to be scaled up dramatically. Also, there is a new demand for securely connecting distant institutions, due to several associations between them. We studied the optimal design of the future next-generation network GIGANET2, choosing a new topology, predicting future capacity demands and taking into account real pricing information obtained from telecom companies and optical hardware vendors. The study consisted of involved optimization efforts, and large-scale comparisons of optical hardware and available fiber infrastructure. This work resulted in the design of a physical optical ring topology, together with three network scenarios which are subject to different bandwidth, reliability and cost considerations, closely matching the institutions' requirements. This paper presents the final results of the study.
Pieter Audenaert, Sofie Verbrugge, Leen Depré, Didier Colle, Ilse Lievens, Mario Pickavet, Piet Demeester, W. Derijnck, P. Van Hecke, J. Valcke, J. Torreele
INFOCOM9