Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gordon E. Moore

dblp:83/5340 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Integrated circuit design · 85% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 8% High-performance computing · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
large-scale integration
0.011998
Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits · Proc. IEEE 1998
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices
semiconductor device technology
0.011998
The role of Fairchild in silicon technology in the early days of "Silicon Valley" · Proc. IEEE 1998
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor technology › semiconductor process technology
silicon technology
0.011998
The role of Fairchild in silicon technology in the early days of "Silicon Valley" · Proc. IEEE 1998
High-performance computing
distributed memory systems
0.011998
Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits · Proc. IEEE 1998
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor device fabrication
integrated circuit manufacturing
0.011998
The role of Fairchild in silicon technology in the early days of "Silicon Valley" · Proc. IEEE 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

integration technologies · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 The role of Fairchild in silicon technology in the early days of "Silicon Valley"
abstract
Fairchild Semiconductor was founded in 1957 by a group originating from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory, the first organization attempting to exploit silicon transistor technology in the region at the base of the San Francisco peninsula now often referred to as "Silicon Valley". Fairchild produced the first commercial silicon mesa transistors and invented the "planar" process that formed the basis of practical integrated circuits. Several of the key directions in silicon device technology originated at Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation and its successor organization, the Semiconductor Division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation. This paper describes the author's recollections of some of the related events.
Gordon E. Moore
Proc. IEEE1
1998 Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits
abstract
The future of integrated electronics is the future of electronics itself. The advantages of integration will bring about a proliferation of electronics, pushing this science into many new areas. Integrated circuits will lead to such wonders as home computers—or at least terminals connected to a central computer—automatic controls for automobiles, and personal portable communications equipment. The electronic wristwatch needs only a display to be feasible today. But the biggest potential lies in the production of large systems. In telephone communications, integrated circuits in digital filters will separate channels on multiplex equipment. Integrated circuits will also switch telephone circuits and perform data processing. Computers will be more powerful, and will be organized in completely different ways. For example, memories built of integrated electronics may be distributed throughout the machine instead of being concentrated in a central unit. In addition, the improved reliability made possible by integrated circuits will allow the construction of larger processing units. Machines similar to those in existence today will be built at lower costs and with faster turnaround.
Gordon E. Moore
Proc. IEEE1