Mark D. Burdick

Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

? Tutorial for this page

Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

dblp:83/6657 · DBLP profile ↗

← Back

2ranked-venue papers

0as first author

0since 2021 · last 2000

—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing 2 papers		Human-AI interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence 1 paper		Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

Topic	Weight	Papers	Last	Evidence papers
Human-AI interaction › reliance on AI automation bias	0.1	2	2000	Accountability and automation bias · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2000 Does automation bias decision-making? · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1999
Human-AI interaction human-automation collaboration	0.0	1	2000	Accountability and automation bias · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2000

Year	Publication	Venue	Position
2000	Accountability and automation bias Linda J. Skitka, Kathleen L. Mosier, Mark D. Burdick	Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.	3
1999	Does automation bias decision-making? Linda J. Skitka, Kathleen L. Mosier, Mark D. Burdick	Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.	3