Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eugene P. van Someren

dblp:84/2566 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
gene regulatory network
0.122006
Least absolute regression network analysis of the murine osteoblast differentiation network · Bioinform. 2006
Linear Modeling of Genetic Networks from Experimental Data · ISMB 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
network inference
0.112006
Least absolute regression network analysis of the murine osteoblast differentiation network · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference › gene regulatory network inference
reverse engineering
0.112006
Least absolute regression network analysis of the murine osteoblast differentiation network · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simultaneous shrinking · 0.1linear model · 0.1least absolute regression · 0.1linear modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Developing computational model-based diagnostics to analyse clinical chemistry data
abstract
This article provides methodological and technical considerations to researchers starting to develop computational model-based diagnostics using clinical chemistry data. These models are of increasing importance, since novel metabolomics and proteomics measuring technologies are able to produce large amounts of data that are difficult to interpret at first sight, but have high diagnostic potential. Computational models aid interpretation and make the data accessible for clinical diagnosis. We discuss the issues that a modeller has to take into account during the design, construction and evaluation phases of model development. We use the example of Particle Profiler development, a model-based diagnostic tool for lipoprotein disorders, as a case study, to illustrate our considerations. The case study also offers techniques for efficient model formulation, model calculation, workflow structuring and quality control.
Daniël B. van Schalkwijk, Kees van Bochove, Ben van Ommen, Andreas P. Freidig, Eugene P. van Someren, Jan van der Greef, Albert A. de Graaf
Briefings Bioinform.5
2010 Delineation of amplification, hybridization and location effects in microarray data yields better-quality normalization
abstract
BACKGROUND: Oligonucleotide arrays have become one of the most widely used high-throughput tools in biology. Due to their sensitivity to experimental conditions, normalization is a crucial step when comparing measurements from these arrays. Normalization is, however, far from a solved problem. Frequently, we encounter datasets with significant technical effects that currently available methods are not able to correct. RESULTS: We show that by a careful decomposition of probe specific amplification, hybridization and array location effects, a normalization can be performed that allows for a much improved analysis of these data. Identification of the technical sources of variation between arrays has allowed us to build statistical models that are used to estimate how the signal of individual probes is affected, based on their properties. This enables a model-based normalization that is probe-specific, in contrast with the signal intensity distribution normalization performed by many current methods. Next to this, we propose a novel way of handling background correction, enabling the use of background information to weight probes during summarization. Testing of the proposed method shows a much improved detection of differentially expressed genes over earlier proposed methods, even when tested on (experimentally tightly controlled and replicated) spike-in datasets. CONCLUSIONS: When a limited number of arrays are available, or when arrays are run in different batches, technical effects have a large influence on the measured expression of genes. We show that a detailed modelling and correction of these technical effects allows for an improved analysis in these situations.
Marc Hulsman, Anouk Mentink, Eugene P. van Someren, Koen J. Dechering, Jan de Boer, Marcel J. T. Reinders
BMC Bioinform.3
2006 Least absolute regression network analysis of the murine osteoblast differentiation network
abstract
Abstract Motivation: We propose a reverse engineering scheme to discover genetic regulation from genome-wide transcription data that monitors the dynamic transcriptional response after a change in cellular environment. The interaction network is estimated by solving a linear model using simultaneous shrinking of the least absolute weights and the prediction error. Results: The proposed scheme has been applied to the murine C2C12 cell-line stimulated to undergo osteoblast differentiation. Results show that our method discovers genetic interactions that display significant enrichment of co-citation in literature. More detailed study showed that the inferred network exhibits properties and hypotheses that are consistent with current biological knowledge. Availability: Software is freely available for academic use as a Matlab package called GENLAB: Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Additional data, results and figures can be found at
Eugene P. van Someren, B. L. T. Vaes, W. T. Steegenga, Anneke M. Sijbers, Koen J. Dechering, Marcel J. T. Reinders
Bioinform.1
2003 Multi-criterion optimization for genetic network modeling
Eugene P. van Someren, Lodewyk F. A. Wessels, Eric Backer, Marcel J. T. Reinders
Signal Process.1
2000 Linear Modeling of Genetic Networks from Experimental Data
Eugene P. van Someren, Lodewyk F. A. Wessels, Marcel J. T. Reinders
ISMB1
1999 Information processing for intelligent molecular diagnosis
Lodewyk F. A. Wessels, Eugene P. van Someren, Marcel J. T. Reinders
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2