Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexia Nielsen

dblp:84/4289 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Accessibility and assistive technology · 30% Usability and user experience research · 30% Human-AI interaction · 30%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
auditory interface
0.112009
Bringing design considerations to the mobile phone and driving debate · CHI 2009
Usability and user experience research › safety-critical interaction
driver distraction
0.112009
Bringing design considerations to the mobile phone and driving debate · CHI 2009
Human-AI interaction › virtual agents
embodied agents
0.112009
Evaluating the effects of behavioral realism in embodied agents · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2009
Health and well-being technologies
driving safety
0.012009
Bringing design considerations to the mobile phone and driving debate · CHI 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

driving simulation · 0.1between-participants experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Bringing design considerations to the mobile phone and driving debate
abstract
Though legislation is increasingly discouraging drivers from holding on to their mobile phones while talking, hands-free devices do not improve driver safety. We offer two design alternatives to improve driver safety in the contexts of voice-based user interfaces and mobile phone conversations in cars' side tones (auditory feedback used in landline phones) and location of speakers. In a 2 (side tone: present vs. not) x 2 (location of speakers: headphones vs. dashboard) between-participants experiment (N=48), we investigated the impact of these features upon driver experience and performance on a simulated mobile phone conversation while driving. Participants became more verbally engaged in the conversation when side tones were present, but also experienced more cognitive load. Participants drove more safely when voices were projected from the dashboard rather than from headphones. Implications for driver user interface design are discussed.
Leila Takayama, Jo Ann G. Sison, Brian Lathrop, Nicholas Wolfe, Abe Chiang, Alexia Nielsen, Clifford Nass
CHI6
2009 Evaluating the effects of behavioral realism in embodied agents
Victoria Groom, Clifford Nass, Tina Chen, Alexia Nielsen, James K. Scarborough, Erica Robles
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.4