Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wael Ashmawi

dblp:84/4901 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 50% Content delivery and video streaming · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service
differentiated services
0.012001
On the impact of policing and rate guarantees in DiffServ networks: a video streaming application perspective · SIGCOMM 2001
Internet architecture and protocols › quality of service › differentiated services
expedited forwarding
0.012001
On the impact of policing and rate guarantees in DiffServ networks: a video streaming application perspective · SIGCOMM 2001
Content delivery and video streaming
quality of experience
0.012001
On the impact of policing and rate guarantees in DiffServ networks: a video streaming application perspective · SIGCOMM 2001
Content delivery and video streaming › quality of experience
video streaming quality
0.012001
On the impact of policing and rate guarantees in DiffServ networks: a video streaming application perspective · SIGCOMM 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

testbed measurement · 0.0objective video quality measurement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 On the impact of policing and rate guarantees in DiffServ networks: a video streaming application perspective
abstract
Over the past few years, there have been a number of proposals aimed at introducing different levels of service in the Internet. One of the more recent proposals is the Differentiated Services (Diff-Serv) architecture, and in this paper we explore how the policing actions and associated rate guarantees provided by the Expedited Forwarding (EF) translate into perceived benefits for applications that are the presumed users of such enhancements. Specifically, we focus on video streaming applications that arguably have relatively strong service quality requirements, and which should, therefore, stand to benefit from the availability of some form of enhanced service. Our goal is to gain a better understanding of the relation that exists between application level quality measures and the selection of the network level parameters that govern the delivery of the guarantees that an EF based service would provide. Our investigation, which is experimental in nature, relies on a number of standard streaming video servers and clients that have been modified and instrumented to allow quantification of the perceived quality of the received video stream. Quality assessments are performed using a Video Quality Measurement tool based on the ANSI objective quality standard. Measurements were made over both a local Diff-Serv testbed and across the QBone, a QoS enabled segment of the Internet2 infrastructure. The paper reports and analyzes the results of those measurements.
Wael Ashmawi, Roch Guérin, Stephen Wolf, Margaret H. Pinson
SIGCOMM1