Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Deverett
dblp:84/9760
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Reinforcement learning · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Interval timing in deep reinforcement learning agents · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.4feedforward neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Interval timing in deep reinforcement learning agentsabstractThe measurement of time is central to intelligent behavior. We know that both animals and artificial agents can successfully use temporal dependencies to select actions. In artificial agents, little work has directly addressed (1) which architectural components are necessary for successful development of this ability, (2) how this timing ability comes to be represented in the units and actions of the agent, and (3) whether the resulting behavior of the system converges on solutions similar to those of biology. Here we studied interval timing abilities in deep reinforcement learning agents trained end-to-end on an interval reproduction paradigm inspired by experimental literature on mechanisms of timing. We characterize the strategies developed by recurrent and feedforward agents, which both succeed at temporal reproduction using distinct mechanisms, some of which bear specific and intriguing similarities to biological systems. These findings advance our understanding of how agents come to represent time, and they highlight the value of experimentally inspired approaches to characterizing agent abilities. Ben Deverett, Ryan Faulkner 0001, Meire Fortunato, Greg Wayne, Joel Z. Leibo |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2012 | Learning Deterministic Causal Networks from Observational Data
Ben Deverett, Charles Kemp |
CogSci | 1 |