Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xavi Gratal

dblp:84/9967 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot manipulation · 61% 3D vision · 30% Motion planning and robot control · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape reconstruction
0.112011
Mind the gap - robotic grasping under incomplete observation · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.112011
Mind the gap - robotic grasping under incomplete observation · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping › grasp planning
grasp planning under uncertainty
0.112011
Mind the gap - robotic grasping under incomplete observation · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
manipulation planning
0.012011
Mind the gap - robotic grasping under incomplete observation · ICRA 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symmetry-based shape completion · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 What's in the container? Classifying object contents from vision and touch
abstract
Robots operating in household environments need to interact with food containers of different types. Whether a container is filled with milk, juice, yogurt or coffee may affect the way robots grasp and manipulate the container. In this paper, we concentrate on the problem of identifying what kind of content is in a container based on tactile and/or visual feedback in combination with grasping. In particular, we investigate the benefits of using unimodal (visual or tactile) or bimodal (visual-tactile) sensory data for this purpose. We direct our study toward cardboard containers with liquid or solid content or being empty. The motivation for using grasping rather than shaking is that we want to investigate the content prior to applying manipulation actions to a container. Our results show that we achieve comparable classification rates with unimodal data and that the visual and tactile data are complimentary.
Püren Güler, Yasemin Bekiroglu, Xavi Gratal, Karl Pauwels, Danica Kragic
IROS3
2011 Mind the gap - robotic grasping under incomplete observation
abstract
We consider the problem of grasp and manipulation planning when the state of the world is only partially observable. Specifically, we address the task of picking up unknown objects from a table top. The proposed approach to object shape prediction aims at closing the knowledge gaps in the robot's understanding of the world. A completed state estimate of the environment can then be provided to a simulator in which stable grasps and collision-free movements are planned. The proposed approach is based on the observation that many objects commonly in use in a service robotic scenario possess symmetries. We search for the optimal parameters of these symmetries given visibility constraints. Once found, the point cloud is completed and a surface mesh reconstructed. Quantitative experiments show that the predictions are valid approximations of the real object shape. By demonstrating the approach on two very different robotic platforms its generality is emphasized.
Jeannette Bohg, Matthew Johnson-Roberson, Beatriz León, Javier Felip, Xavi Gratal, Niklas Bergström, Danica Kragic, Antonio Morales
ICRA5