Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rong Du 0001
dblp:85/2037-1
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
10since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5478-896XORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
7 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 93% Security and privacy of machine learning · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 91% Data stream processing · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
5.2 | 7 | 2025 | Top-k Discovery Under Local Differential Privacy: An Adaptive Sampling Approach · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 Privacy for Free: Leveraging Local Differential Privacy Perturbed Data from Multiple Services · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 PrivRM: A Framework for Range Mean Estimation under Local Differential Privacy · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Data mining › pattern mining › itemset mining
frequent itemset mining |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Top-k Discovery Under Local Differential Privacy: An Adaptive Sampling Approach · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 Multi-Class Item Mining Under Local Differential Privacy · ICDE 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Privacy for Free: Leveraging Local Differential Privacy Perturbed Data from Multiple Services · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 Dual Utilization of Perturbation for Stream Data Publication Under Local Differential Privacy · ICDE 2025 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Top-k Discovery Under Local Differential Privacy: An Adaptive Sampling Approach · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › local differential privacy
mean estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PrivRM: A Framework for Range Mean Estimation under Local Differential Privacy · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy accounting
privacy budget allocation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dual Utilization of Perturbation for Stream Data Publication Under Local Differential Privacy · ICDE 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › continual release
streaming data publication |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dual Utilization of Perturbation for Stream Data Publication Under Local Differential Privacy · ICDE 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interactive Trimming Against Evasive Online Data Manipulation Attacks: A Game-Theoretic Approach · ICDE 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing › multiple-choice hashing
cuckoo hashing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multi-copy Cuckoo Hashing · ICDE 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
hash tables |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multi-copy Cuckoo Hashing · ICDE 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Top-k Discovery Under Local Differential Privacy: An Adaptive Sampling Approach · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
multi-armed bandit |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Top-k Discovery Under Local Differential Privacy: An Adaptive Sampling Approach · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-armed bandit · 4.1adaptive sampling · 2.6validity perturbation · 1.7iterative perturbation parameterization · 1.7correlated perturbation · 1.7calibration · 1.7randomized response · 0.9maximum likelihood estimation · 0.9local differential privacy · 0.9adaptive adjustment · 0.9thompson sampling · 0.8game theory · 0.8euler-lagrange equations · 0.8stash strategy · 0.4multi-copy relocation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dual Utilization of Perturbation for Stream Data Publication Under Local Differential PrivacyabstractStream data from real-time distributed systems such as IoT, tele-health, and crowdsourcing has become an important data source. However, the collection and analysis of usergenerated stream data raise privacy concerns due to the potential exposure of sensitive information. To address these concerns, local differential privacy (LDP) has emerged as a promising standard. Nevertheless, applying LDP to stream data presents significant challenges, as stream data often involves a large or even infinite number of values. Allocating a given privacy budget across these data points would introduce overwhelming LDP noise to the original stream data. Beyond existing approaches that merely use perturbed values for estimating statistics, our design leverages them for both perturbation and estimation. This dual utilization arises from a key observation: each user knows their own ground truth and perturbed values, enabling a precise computation of the deviation error caused by perturbation. By incorporating this deviation into the perturbation process of subsequent values, the previous noise can be calibrated. Following this insight, we introduce the Iterative Perturbation Parameterization (IPP) method, which utilizes current perturbed results to calibrate the subsequent perturbation process. To enhance the robustness of calibration and reduce sensitivity, two algorithms, namely Accumulated Perturbation Parameterization (APP) and Clipped Accumulated Perturbation Parameterization (CAPP) are further developed. We prove that these three algorithms satisfy$w$-event differential privacy while significantly improving utility. Experimental results demonstrate that our techniques outperform state-of-the-art LDP stream publishing solutions in terms of utility, while retaining the same privacy guarantee. Rong Du 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Yaxin Xiao, Liantong Yu, Haibo Hu 0001 |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-Class Item Mining Under Local Differential PrivacyabstractItem mining, a fundamental task for collecting statistical data from users, has raised increasing privacy concerns. To address these concerns, local differential privacy (LDP) was proposed as a privacy-preserving technique. Existing LDP item mining mechanisms primarily concentrate on global statistics, i.e., those from the entire dataset. Nevertheless, they fall short of usertailored tasks such as personalized recommendations, whereas classwise statistics can improve task accuracy with fine-grained information. Meanwhile, the introduction of class labels brings new challenges. Label perturbation may result in invalid items for aggregation. To this end, we propose frameworks for multi-class item mining, along with two mechanisms: validity perturbation to reduce the impact of invalid data, and correlated perturbation to preserve the relationship between labels and items. We also apply these optimized methods to two multi-class item mining queries: frequency estimation and top-$k$item mining. Through theoretical analysis and extensive experiments, we verify the effectiveness and superiority of these methods. Yulian Mao, Qingqing Ye 0001, Rong Du 0001, Qi Wang 0012, Kai Huang 0011, Haibo Hu 0001 |
ICDE | 3 |
| 2025 | Secure bi-attribute index: Batch membership tests over the non-sensitive attribute
Qingqing Ye 0001, Rong Du 0001, Haibo Hu 0001 |
Comput. Secur. | 3 |
| 2025 | PrivRM: A Framework for Range Mean Estimation under Local Differential PrivacyabstractThe increasing collection and analysis of personal data driven by digital technologies has raised concerns about individual privacy. Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a promising solution to provide rigorous privacy guarantee for users, without relying on a trusted data collector. In the context of LDP, range mean estimation over numerical values is an important yet challenging problem. Simply applying existing work may introduce overly large noise sensitivity, since all of them focus on statistical tasks (e.g., mean or distribution) across the entire domain. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for Private Range Mean ( PrivRM ) estimation under LDP. Two implementations of the framework, namely PrivRM I and PrivRM * , are developed, which are adaptable to all existing numerical value perturbation mechanisms. As an optimization of the framework, we also propose a distribution-aware Adaptive Adjustment (AA) strategy to dynamically confine the perturbation space for skewed data distributions. Extensive experimental results show that under the same privacy guarantee and query range, our framework PrivRM significantly improve over existing solutions. Liantong Yu, Qingqing Ye 0001, Rong Du 0001 |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 3 |
| 2025 | Privacy for Free: Leveraging Local Differential Privacy Perturbed Data from Multiple ServicesabstractLocal Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a widely adopted privacy-preserving technique in modern data analytics, enabling users to share statistical insights while maintaining robust privacy guarantees. However, current LDP applications assume a single service gathering perturbed information from users. In reality, multiple services may be interested in collecting users' data, which poses privacy burdens to users as more such services emerge. To address this issue, this paper proposes a framework for collecting and aggregating data based on perturbed information from multiple services, regardless of their estimated statistics (e.g., mean or distribution) and perturbation mechanisms. Then for mean estimation, we introduce the Unbiased Averaging (UA) method and its optimized version, User-level Weighted Averaging (UWA). The former utilizes biased perturbed data, while the latter assigns weights to different perturbed results based on perturbation information, thereby achieving minimal variance. For distribution estimation, we propose the User-level Likelihood Estimation (ULE), which treats all perturbed results from a user as a whole for maximum likelihood estimation. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework and constituting methods significantly improve the accuracy of both mean and distribution estimation. Rong Du 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Haibo Hu 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2025 | Top-k Discovery Under Local Differential Privacy: An Adaptive Sampling ApproachabstractLocal differential privacy (LDP) is a promising privacy model for data collection that protects sensitive information of individuals. However, applying LDP to top-$k$estimation in set-valued data (e.g., identifying most frequent$k$items) may yield poor results for small and sparse datasets due to high sensitivity and heavy perturbation. To address this, we propose an adaptive approach that frames the problem as a multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem, in which the decision-maker selects actions based on information collected from previous rounds to maximize the total reward over time. Inspired by this, we present two adaptive sampling schemes based on MAB:ARBSfor identifying top-$k$items andARBSFfor both top-$k$item discovery and frequency estimation on these items. Furthermore, to address the potential long delay of multi-round collection, we propose an optimization technique to reduce the time complexity. Both theoretical and empirical results show that our adaptive sampling schemes significantly outperform existing alternatives. Rong Du 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Haibo Hu 0001, Kai Huang 0011 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 1 |
| 2025 | Collecting Multi-type and Correlation-Constrained Streaming Sensor Data with Local Differential PrivacyabstractLocal differential privacy (LDP) is a promising privacy model for distributed data collection. It has been widely deployed in real-world systems (e.g., Chrome, iOS, macOS). In LDP-based mechanisms, an aggregator collects private values perturbed by each user and then analyses these values to estimate their statistics, such as frequency and mean. Most existing works focus on simple scalar value types, such as boolean and categorical values. However, with the emergence of smart sensors and Internet of Things, high-dimensional data are gaining increasing popularity. In many cases where more than one type of sensor data are collected simultaneously, correlations exist between various attributes of such data, e.g., temperature and luminance. To ensure LDP for high-dimensional data, existing solutions either partition the privacy budget ε among these correlated attributes or adopt sampling, both of which dilute the density of useful information and thus result in poor data utility. In this paper, we propose a relaxed LDP model, namely, univariate dominance local differential privacy (UDLDP), for high-dimensional data. We quantify the correlations between attributes and present a correlation-bounded perturbation (CBP) mechanism that optimizes the partitioning of privacy budget on each correlated attribute. Furthermore, we extend CBP to support sampling, which is a common bandwidth reduction technique in sensor networks and Internet of Things. We derive the best allocation strategy of sampling probabilities among attributes in terms of data utility, which leads to the correlation-bounded perturbation mechanism with sampling (CBPS). Finally, we discuss how to collect and leverage the correlation from real-time data stream with a by-round algorithm to enhance the utility. The performance of the proposed mechanisms is evaluated and compared with state-of-the-art LDP mechanisms on real-world and synthetic datasets. Qingqing Ye 0001, Rong Du 0001, Haibo Hu 0001 |
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks | 3 |
| 2024 | Interactive Trimming Against Evasive Online Data Manipulation Attacks: A Game-Theoretic ApproachabstractWith the exponential growth of data and its crucial impact on our lives and decision-making, the integrity of data has become a significant concern. Malicious data poisoning attacks, where false values are injected into the data, can disrupt machine learning processes and lead to severe consequences. To mitigate these attacks, distance-based defenses, such as trimming, have been proposed, but they can be easily evaded by white-box attackers. The evasiveness and effectiveness of poisoning attack strategies are two sides of the same coin, making game theory a promising approach. However, existing game-theoretical models often overlook the complexities of online data poisoning attacks, where strategies must adapt to the dynamic process of data collection. In this paper, we present an interactive game-theoretical model to defend online data manipulation attacks using the trimming strategy. Our model accommodates a complete strategy space, making it applicable to strong evasive and colluding adversaries. Leveraging the principle of least action and the Euler-Lagrange equation from theoretical physics, we derive an analytical model for the game-theoretic process. To demonstrate its practical usage, we present a case study in a privacy-preserving data collection system under local differential privacy where a non-deterministic utility function is adopted. Two strategies are devised from this analytical model, namely, Tit-for-tat and Elastic. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets, which showcase the effectiveness and accuracy of these two strategies. Qingqing Ye 0001, Rong Du 0001, Haibo Hu 0001 |
ICDE | 3 |
| 2023 | Differential Aggregation against General Colluding AttackersabstractLocal Differential Privacy (LDP) is now widely adopted in large-scale systems to collect and analyze sensitive data while preserving users’ privacy. However, almost all LDP protocols rely on a semi-trust model where users are curious-but-honest, which rarely holds in real-world scenarios. Recent works [6], [11], [62] show poor estimation accuracy of many LDP protocols under malicious threat models. Although a few works have proposed some countermeasures to address these attacks, they all require prior knowledge of either the attacking pattern or the poison value distribution, which is impractical as they can be easily evaded by the attackers.In this paper, we adopt a general opportunistic-and-colluding threat model and propose a multi-group Differential Aggregation Protocol (DAP) to improve the accuracy of mean estimation under LDP. Different from all existing works that detect poison values on individual basis, DAP mitigates the overall impact of poison values on the estimated mean. It relies on a new probing mechanism EMF (i.e., Expectation-Maximization Filter) to estimate features of the attackers. In addition to EMF, DAP also consists of two EMF post-processing procedures (EMF* and CEMF*), and a group-wise mean aggregation scheme to optimize the final estimated mean to achieve the smallest variance. Extensive experimental results on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the superior performance of DAP over state-of-the-art solutions. Rong Du 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Haibo Hu 0001, Jin Li 0002, Chengfang Fang, Jie Shi 0005 |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2021 | Collecting High-Dimensional and Correlation-Constrained Data with Local Differential PrivacyabstractLocal differential privacy (LDP) is a promising privacy model for distributed data collection. It has been widely deployed in real-world systems (e.g. Chrome, iOS, macOS). In LDP-based mechanisms, an aggregator collects private values perturbed by each user and then analyses these values to estimate their statistics, such as frequency and mean. Most existing works focus on simple scalar value types, such as boolean and categorical values. However, with the emergence of smart sensors and internet of things, high-dimensional data are gaining increasing popularity. In many cases, correlations exist between various attributes of such data, e.g. temperature and luminance. To ensure LDP for high-dimensional data, existing solutions either partition the privacy budget ϵ among these correlated attributes or adopt sampling, both of which dilute the density of useful information and thus result in poor data utility.In this paper, we propose a relaxed LDP model, namely, univariate dominance local differential privacy (UDLDP), for high-dimensional data. We quantify the correlations between attributes and present a correlation-bounded perturbation (CBP) mechanism that optimizes the partitioning of privacy budget on each correlated attribute. Furthermore, we extend CBP to support sampling, which is a common bandwidth reduction technique in sensor networks and Internet of Things. We derive the best allocation strategy of sampling probabilities among attributes in terms of data utility, which leads to the correlation-bounded perturbation mechanism with sampling (CBPS). The performance of both mechanisms is evaluated and compared with state-of-the-art LDP mechanisms on real-world and synthetic datasets. Rong Du 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Haibo Hu 0001 |
SECON | 1 |
| 2020 | Cloud Password Shield: A Secure Cloud-based Firewall against DDoS on Authentication ServersabstractPassword-based authentication is essential to any online service. It is normally powered by a database of user credentials, for example a RADIUS server. However, even with various indexing techniques (e.g., B+-tree), password-based authentication can still be resource-consuming on large-scale systems (e.g., Internet and IoT), and is thus vulnerable to distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.In this paper, we propose a cloud-based firewall that uses Bloom filters to pre-screen and reject suspicious requests with wrong password before they reach the authentication server. The main challenge is the security of the firewall because it can be operated by a third party, so the Bloom filters might be accessed by adversaries to assist their brute-force password guessing.To ensure security, we start with the assumption of trusted cloud server and design a key-based semantic secure Bloom filter (KSSBF) for the best efficiency. We then design a generically secure Bloom filter (GSBF) for non-trusted cloud servers, which is key-independent and with strictly provable security. Through theoretical and empirical analysis, we show both of them can mitigate malicious requests without compromising the security of passwords. Man Ho Au, Rong Du 0001, Haibo Hu 0001, Dagang Li 0001 |
ICDCS | 3 |
| 2019 | Multi-copy Cuckoo HashingabstractCuckoo hashing is widely used for its worst-case constant lookup performance even at very high load. However at high load, collision resolution will involve lots of probes on item relocation and may still fail in the end. To address the problem, we propose an efficient Cuckoo hashing scheme called Multi-copy Cuckoo or McCuckoo. Different from the blind kick-outs of standard Cuckoo hashing during a collision, we can foresee which way to successfully kick items by using multiple copies. Furthermore, with the knowledge of how many copies each item has in the table, we can identify impossible buckets and skip them during a lookup. In order to avoid expensive rehashing during insertion failures, McCuckoo also supports more efficient stash strategy that minimizes stash checking. McCuckoo uses simple logic and simple data structure, so it is suitable for both software and hardware implementation on platforms where intensive access to the slow and bandwidth limited off-chip external memory is the main bottleneck. Dagang Li 0001, Rong Du 0001, Tong Yang 0003, Bin Cui 0001 |
ICDE | 2 |