Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James V. Miller

dblp:85/5570 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
0000-0003-1877-7881ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 14 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 10Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Image and video processing · 93% Geometric modeling and processing · 7%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 77% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.112007
Locally-Constrained Region-Based Methods for DW-MRI Segmentation · ICCV 2007
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112007
Locally-Constrained Region-Based Methods for DW-MRI Segmentation · ICCV 2007
Image and video processing › image segmentation
region-based segmentation
0.112007
Locally-Constrained Region-Based Methods for DW-MRI Segmentation · ICCV 2007
Image and video processing
edge detection
0.012004
Bias in the Localization of Curved Edges · ECCV (2) 2004
Image and video processing › image segmentation › 3d image segmentation
range image segmentation
0.011997
Prediction Intervals for Surface Growing Range Segmentation · CVPR 1997
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric estimation › geometric model fitting
surface fitting
0.011996
MUSE: Robust Surface Fitting using Unbiased Scale Estimates · CVPR 1996
Geometric modeling and processing
deformable models
0.011991
Geometrically deformed models: a method for extracting closed geometric models form volume data · SIGGRAPH 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal path propagation · 0.1locally-constrained region-based approach · 0.1uncertainty estimation · 0.0multivariate regression · 0.0unbiased scale estimator · 0.0robust statistics · 0.0MUSE · 0.0relaxation · 0.0geometrically deformed models · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Sheet-Like White Matter Fiber Tracts: Representation, Clustering, and Quantitative Analysis
Mahnaz Maddah, James V. Miller, Edith V. Sullivan, Adolf Pfefferbaum, Torsten Rohlfing
MICCAI (2)2
2009 Nonparametric Intensity Priors for Level Set Segmentation of Low Contrast Structures
Sokratis Makrogiannis, Rahul Bhotika, James V. Miller, John Skinner, Melissa Vass
MICCAI (1)3
2007 Locally-Constrained Region-Based Methods for DW-MRI Segmentation
abstract
In this paper, we describe a method for segmenting fiber bundles from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images using a locally-constrained region based approach. From a pre-computed optimal path, the algorithm propagates outward capturing only those voxels which are locally connected to the fiber bundle. Rather than attempting to find large numbers of open curves or single fibers, which individually have questionable meaning, this method segments the full fiber bundle region. The strengths of this approach include its ease-of-use, computational speed, and applicability to a wide range of fiber bundles. In this work, we show results for segmenting the cingulum bundle. Finally, we explain how this approach and extensions thereto overcome a major problem that typical region-based flows experience when attempting to segment neural fiber bundles.
John Melonakos, Marc Niethammer, Vandana Mohan, Marek Kubicki, James V. Miller, Allen R. Tannenbaum
ICCV5
2007 Atlas stratification
Daniel J. Blezek, James V. Miller
Medical Image Anal.2
2006 Part-Based Local Shape Models for Colon Polyp Detection
Rahul Bhotika, Paulo R. S. Mendonça, Saad A. Sirohey, Wesley D. Turner, Ying-Lin Lee, Julie M. McCoy, Rebecca E. B. Brown, James V. Miller
MICCAI (2)8
2006 Atlas Stratification
Daniel J. Blezek, James V. Miller
MICCAI (1)2
2006 Objective PET Lesion Segmentation Using a Spherical Mean Shift Algorithm
Thomas B. Sebastian, Ravindra M. Manjeshwar, Timothy J. Akhurst, James V. Miller
MICCAI (2)4
2006 A Method for Registering Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images
Xiaodong Tao, James V. Miller
MICCAI (2)2
2006 An Analysis of Early Studies Released by the Lung Imaging Database Consortium (LIDC)
Wesley D. Turner, Timothy P. Kelliher, James C. Ross, James V. Miller
MICCAI (2)4
2005 Model-Based Analysis of Local Shape for Lesion Detection in CT Scans
Paulo R. S. Mendonça, Rahul Bhotika, Saad A. Sirohey, Wesley D. Turner, James V. Miller, Ricardo S. Avila
MICCAI5
2005 Quantification of Emphysema Severity by Histogram Analysis of CT Scans
Paulo R. S. Mendonça, Dirk Ryan Padfield, James C. Ross, James V. Miller, Sandeep Dutta, Sardar Mal Gautham
MICCAI4
2004 Bias in the Localization of Curved Edges
Paulo R. S. Mendonça, Dirk Ryan Padfield, James V. Miller, Matthew W. Turek
ECCV (2)3
1997 Prediction Intervals for Surface Growing Range Segmentation
abstract
The surface growing framework presented by P. Besl and R. Jain (1988) has served as the basis for many range segmentation techniques. It has been augmented with alternative fitting techniques, model selection criteria, and solid modelling components. All of these approaches, however require global thresholds and large isolated seed regions. Range scenes typically do not satisfy the global threshold assumption since it requires data noise characteristics to be constant throughout the scene. Furthermore, as scene complexity increases, the number of surfaces, discontinuities, and outliers increase, hindering the identification of large seed regions. We present statistical criteria based on multivariate regression to replace the traditional decision criteria used in surface growing. We use local estimates and their uncertainties to construct criteria which capture the uncertainty in extrapolating estimated fits. We restrict surface expansion to very localized extrapolations, increasing the sensitivity to discontinuities and allowing regions to refine their estimates and uncertainties. Our approach uses a small number of parameters which are either statistical thresholds or cardinality measures, i.e. we do not use thresholds defined by specific range distances or orientation angles.
James V. Miller, Charles V. Stewart
CVPR1
1996 MUSE: Robust Surface Fitting using Unbiased Scale Estimates
abstract
Despite many successful applications of robust statistics, they have yet to be completely adapted to many computer vision problems. Range reconstruction, particularly in unstructured environments, requires a robust estimator that not only tolerates a large outlier percentage but also tolerates several discontinuities, extracting multiple surfaces in an image region. Observing that random outliers and/or points from across discontinuities increase a hypothesized fit's scale estimate (standard deviation of the noise), our new operator; called MUSE (Minimum Unbiased Scale Estimator), evaluates a hypothesized fit over potential inlier sets via an objective function of unbiased scale estimates. MUSE extracts the single best fit from the data by minimizing its objective function over a set of hypothesized fits and can sequentially extract multiple surfaces from an image region. We show MUSE to be effective on synthetic data modelling small scale discontinuities and in preliminary experiments on complicated range data.
James V. Miller, Charles V. Stewart
CVPR1
1991 Geometrically deformed models: a method for extracting closed geometric models form volume data
abstract
We propose a new approach to the problem of generating a simple topologically-closed geometric model from a point-sampled volume data set. We call such a model a Geometrically Deformed Model or GDM. A GDM is created by placing a 'seed' model in the volume data set. The model is then deformed by a relaxation process that minimizes a set of constraints that provides a measure of how well the model fits the features in the data. Constraints are associated with each vertex in the model that control local deformation, interaction between the model and the data set, and the shape and topology of the model. Once generated, a GDM can be used for visualization, shape recognition, geometric measurements, or subjected to a series of geometric operations. This technique is of special importance because of the advent of nondestructive sensing equipment (CT, MRI) that generates point samples of true three-dimensional objects.
James V. Miller, David E. Breen, William E. Lorensen, Robert M. O'Bara, Michael J. Wozny
SIGGRAPH1
1990 Extracting Geometric Models Through Constraint Minimization
abstract
The authors propose a methodology that will extract a topologically closed geometric model from a two-dimensional image. This is accomplished by starting with a simple model that is already topologically closed and deforming the model, based on a set of constraints, so that the model grows (shrinks) to fit the feature within the image while maintaining its closed and locally simple nature. The initial model is a non-self-intersecting polygon that is either embedded in the feature or surrounds the feature. There is a cost function associated with every vertex that quantifies its deformation, the properties of simple polygons, and the relationship between noise and feature. The constraints embody local properties of simple polygons and the nature of the relationship between noise and the features in the image.>
James V. Miller, David E. Breen, Michael J. Wozny
IEEE Visualization1