Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ahmad Al Hanbali

dblp:85/5878 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 75% Physical-layer communications · 25%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking
mobile ad hoc networks
0.112006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006
Wireless networking
mobility models
0.112006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006
Wireless networking › mobility models
random waypoint model
0.112006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006
Physical-layer communications
relaying
0.112006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models › buffer analysis
buffer utilization
0.012006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
heavy-traffic analysis
0.012006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.012006
Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks · INFOCOM 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic geometry · 0.1queueing theory · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Interval Availability Analysis of a Two-echelon, Multi-item System
Ahmad Al Hanbali, Matthieu van der Heijden
ICORES1
2011 The integration of spectral analyses of Landsat ETM+ with the DEM data for mapping mangrove forests
abstract
This study aims to develop an efficient method to extract mangrove forests at a regional scale using remote sensing data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technique. A regional mangrove forests mapping method was developed based on the spectral characteristics and the topographic existence condition of mangrove forests. Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus (ETM+) and digital elevation model (DEM) were used to enhance the discrimination between mangrove forests and other different kinds of forests and vegetations to achieve the purpose of this study in the southern part of Japan. The maximum likelihood supervised classification technique was applied to map mangrove forests. The resultant mangrove forests map were further validated by using aerial photographs, topographic maps and other local vegetation maps. This study revealed that mangrove forests in the study area could be accurately mapped from integration of spectral data derived from Landsat ETM+ together with topographic information.
Bayan Alsaaideh, Ahmad Al Hanbali, Ryutaro Tateishi, Hoan Nguyen Thanh
IGARSS2
2008 Performance of ad hoc networks with two-hop relay routing and limited packet lifetime (extended version)
Ahmad Al Hanbali, Philippe Nain, Eitan Altman
Perform. Evaluation1
2007 Simple Models for the Performance Evaluation of a Class of Two-Hop Relay Protocols
Ahmad Al Hanbali, Arzad Alam Kherani, Philippe Nain
Networking1
2007 Impact of mobility on the performance of relaying in ad hoc networks - Extended version
Ahmad Al Hanbali, Arzad Alam Kherani, Robin Groenevelt, Philippe Nain, Eitan Altman
Comput. Networks1
2007 Delay and resource analysis in MANETs in presence of throwboxes
Mouhamad Ibrahim, Ahmad Al Hanbali, Philippe Nain
Perform. Evaluation2
2006 Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks
abstract
We consider a mobile ad hoc network consisting of three types of nodes: source, destination, and relay nodes. All the nodes are moving over a bounded region with possibly different mobility patterns. We introduce and study the notion of relay throughput, i.e. the maximum rate at which a node can relay data from the source to the destination. Our findings include the results that the relay throughput depends on the node mobility pattern only via its (stationary) node position distribution and that a node mobility pattern that results in a uniform steady-state distribution for all nodes achieves the lowest relay throughput. Random Waypoint and Random Direction mobility models in both one and in two dimensions are studied and approximate simple expressions for the relay throughput are provided. Finally, the behavior of the relay buffer occupancy is examined for the one-dimensional Random Walk, and an explicit form of its mean value is provided in the heavy-traffic case.
Ahmad Al Hanbali, Arzad Alam Kherani, Robin Groenevelt, Philippe Nain, Eitan Altman
INFOCOM1
2006 Performance of Ad Hoc Networks with Two-Hop Relay Routing and Limited Packet Lifetime
abstract
Considered is a mobile ad hoc network consisting of three types of nodes (source, destination and relay nodes) and using the two-hop relay routing protocol. Packets at relay nodes are assumed to have a limited lifetime in the network. All nodes are moving inside a bounded region according to some random mobility model. Both closed-form expressions, and asymptotic results are provided for the packet delivery delay and the energy needed to transmit a packet from the source to its destination. Our model is validated through simulations for two mobility models (random waypoint and random direction mobility models), numerical results for the two-hop relay protocols are reported, and the performance of the two-hop routing and of the epidemic routing protocols are compared.
Ahmad Al Hanbali, Philippe Nain, Eitan Altman
IWQoS1