Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael J. Gerdes
dblp:86/1136
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 67% Audio and music processing · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Environmental and earth informatics · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Autofluorescence Removal by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011 |
Audio and music processing
nonnegative matrix factorization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Autofluorescence Removal by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011 |
Image and video processing › hyperspectral image analysis
spectral unmixing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Autofluorescence Removal by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis › microscopy image analysis
fluorescence microscopy |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Autofluorescence Removal by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011 |
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
spectral unmixing |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Autofluorescence Removal by Non-Negative Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonnegative matrix factorization · 0.1non-negative matrix factorization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Autofluorescence Removal by Non-Negative Matrix FactorizationabstractThis paper describes a new, physically interpretable, fully automatic algorithm for removal of tissue autofluorescence (AF) from fluorescence microscopy images, by non-negative matrix factorization. Measurement of signal intensities from the concentration of certain fluorescent reporter molecules at each location within a sample of biological tissue is confounded by fluorescence produced by the tissue itself (autofluorescence). Spectral mixing models use mixing coefficients to specify how much fluorescence from each source is present and unmixing algorithms separate the two fluorescent sources. Current spectral unmixing methods for AF removal often require a priori knowledge of mixing coefficients. Those which do not, such as principal component analysis, generate negative mixing coefficients that are not physically meaningful. Non-negative matrix factorization constrains mixing coefficients to be non-negative, and has been used for spectral unmixing, but not AF removal. This paper describes a novel non-negative matrix factorization algorithm which separates fluorescent images into true signal and AF components utilizing an estimate of the dark current. We also present a test-bed, based on fluorescent beads, to compare the performance of different AF removal algorithms. Our algorithm out-performed previous state of the art on validation images. Franco Woolfe, Michael J. Gerdes, Musodiq O. Bello, Xiaodong Tao, Ali Can |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 2 |
| 2010 | Quantification of Subcellular Molecules in Tissue MicroarrayabstractQuantifying expression levels of proteins with sub cellular resolution is critical to many applications ranging from biomarker discovery to treatment planning. In this paper, we present a fully automated method and a new metric that quantifies the expression of target proteins in immunohisto-chemically stained tissue microarray (TMA) samples. The proposed metric is superior to existing intensity or ratio-based methods. We compared performance with the majority decision of a group of 19 observers scoring estrogen receptor (ER) status, achieving a detection rate of 96% with 90% specificity. The presented methods will accelerate the processes of biomarker discovery and transitioning of biomarkers from research bench to clinical utility. Ali Can, Musodiq O. Bello, Michael J. Gerdes |
ICPR | 3 |